Musical knowledge: What can artificial intelligence bring to the musician?

Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 29-46

  Wiggins, Geraint A ^a   Smaill, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070603253     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203059746-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Aho, A., Hopcroft, J., and Ullman, J., Data Structures and Algorithms. Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachussetts, (1983).
2. Bel, B. and Kippen, J., Bol processorgrammars. In Laske, O., Balaban, M., and Ebcioglu, K., editors, Understanding Music with AI -Perspectives on Music Cognition, pages 366-401. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (1992).
3. Boulez, P., Penser la musique aujourd’hui. Gonthier, Mayence, (1963).
4. Buxton, W., Dannenburg, R., and Vercoe, B., The computeras accompanist. In Proceedings of the Conference -Computer Human Interaction, pages 41-43. ACM/SIGCHI, (1986).
5. Camurri, A., Frixione, M., Innocenti, C, and Zacearia, R., A model of representation and communication of music and multimedia knowledge. In Neumann, B., editor, Tenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 164-8, Vienna. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England, (1992).
6. Conklin, D. and Witten, I. H., Prediction and entropy of music. Technical Report 91/457/41, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, (1991).
7. Cope, D., Computers and Musical Style. Oxford University Press, (1991).
8. Dannenberg, R. and Mont-Reynaud, B., Following animprovisation in real time. In Proceedings of the ICMC, pages 241-248, (1987).
9. Desain, P., A (de)composable theory of rhythm perception. Music Perception, 9(4), 439-454, (1992).
10. Desain, P., A connectionist and a traditional AI quantizer, symbolic versus sub-symbolic models of rhythm perception. Contemporary Music Review, 9, 239-254, (1993).
11. Donini, R, Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., and W., N., Tractable conceptlanguages. In Proceedings of IJCAI-91, volume 1, (1991).
12. Harris, M., Smaill, A., and Wiggins, G., Representing musicsymbolically. In IX Colloquio di Informatica Musicale, Genoa, Italy. Also available from Edinburgh as DAI Research Paper No. 562, (1991).
13. Hertz, J., Krogh, A., and Palmer, R. G., Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Redwood City, CA., (1991).
14. Holland, S. and Elsom-Cook, M., Architecture ofa knowledge-based music tutor. In Elsom-Cook, M., editor, Guided Discovery Tutoring, London. Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. (1990).
15. Jackendoff, R., Consciousness and the computational mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (1987).
16. Jones, J. A., Scarborough, D. L., and Miller, B. O., Gtsim -a computer simulation of music perception. In Colloque International -Musique et Assistance Informatique, Marseille. From the proceedings of the Marseille conference. (1990).
17. Leman, M., Symbolic andsubsymbolic information processing in models of musical communication and cognition. Interface, 18, 141-60, (1988).
18. Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R., A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (1983).
19. Machover, T., Hyperinstruments: A progress report 1987-1991. Media lab document, MIT, Cambridge, MA. (1992).
20. Minsky, M., Music, mind and meaning. Computer Music Journal, 5(3), 28-44, (1981).
21. Rothstein, J., MIDI: a comprehensive introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (1992).
22. Rowe, R., Interactive Music Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (1993).
23. Russell, S. and Norvig, P., Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall International, London. (1995).
24. Sloboda, J., The Musical Mind. Oxford Science Press, Oxford. (1985).
25. Smaill, A., Wiggins, G., and Harris, M., Hierarchical musicrepresentation for analysis and composition. Computers and the Humanities, 27, 7-17. Also available from Edinburgh as DAI Research Paper No. 511, (1993a).
26. Smaill, A., Wiggins, G., and Miranda, E., Music representation-between the musician and the computer. In Smith, M., Wiggins, G., and Smaill, A., editors, Music Education: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective. Springer Verlag, London. Also available as DAI Research Paper 668. (1993b).
27. Smith, M., Smaill, A., and Wiggins, G., editors, Music Education: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective, London. Springer Verlag. Workshops in Computing series, (1994).
28. Wiggins, G., Miranda, E., Smaill, A., and Harris, M., A framework for the evaluation of music representation systems. Computer Music Journal, 17(3), 31-42. Also available from Edinburgh as DAI Research Paper No. 658, (1993).