Accountability for program performance: A key to effective performance monitoring and reporting

Monitoring Performance in the Public Sector: Future Directions from International Experience

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 157-174

  Mayne, John ^a  

^a Off of the Auditor Gen of Canada   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070595734     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Auditor General of Canada. 1992. Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons. Minister of Supply and Services
2. Aucoin, P. 1990. "Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums." Governance 3, no. 2: 115-37
3. Aucoin, P. 1990. "Comment: Assessing Managerial Reforms." Governance 3, no. 2: 197-204
4. B. C. School Superintendents' Association. 1992. Developing Indicators and Standards: Choosing Appropriate Measures and Targets of Education Performance
5. Barzelay, M. 1992. Breaking Through Bureaucracy: A New Vision for Managing Government. Berkeley: University of California Press
6. Carter, N. and P. Greer. 1993. "Evaluating Agencies: The Next Steps and Performance Indicators." Public Administration 71, Autumn: 407-16
7. The Economist. 1993. "The State of the State." 14 August: 57
8. Efficiency Unit. 1991. Making the Most of Next Steps: The Management of Ministers Departments and their Executive Agencies. London: HMSO
9. Eriksen, B. 1987. Three Norwegian Initiatives in the Eighties. Paper prepared for International Institute of Administrative Sciences
10. Funnell, S. 1993. Effective Reporting in Program Performance Statements. Australian Department of Finance
11. Government of Canada. 1990. Public Service 2000-The Renewal of the Public Service of Canada. Supply and Services Canada
12. Governmental Accounting Standards Board. 1992. Preliminary Views on Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting. Governmental Accounting Standards Series
13. Holmes, M. 1992. "Public Sector Management Reform: Convergence or Divergence?" Governance 5, no. 4: 472-83
14. Management Advisory Board and Management Improvement Advisory Committee. 1993. Performance Information and the Management Cycle. Australian Government Publishing Service
15. OECD. 1992. Accountability: A Background Paper
16. OECD. 1994. Performance Management in Government: Performance Measurement and Results-Oriented Management. Occasional Paper No.3
17. Office of the Comptroller General. 1991. Line Managers and Assessing Service to the Public
18. Raaum, R. B. 1992. "Measuring and Reporting Performance in Government." Government Accountants Journal, Fall: 19-25
19. Task Force on Management Improvement. 1992. The Australian Public Service Reformed-An Evaluation of a Decade of Public Sector Reform. Australian Government Publishing Service
20. Taylor, J. C. 1992. "Public Accountability Requirements." Australian Journal of Public Administration 51, no. 4: 455-60
21. Treasury and Civil Service Committee. 1991. The new system of departmental reports (5th Report, session 1990-91). London: HMSO
22. Treasury Board of Canada. 1987. Guide to the Preparation of Part III of the Estimates. Supply and Services Canada
23. Treasury Board of Canada. 1994. Treasury Board Manual: Review, Internal Audit and Evaluation
24. Treasury Board of Canada. 1995. Service Standards: A Guide to the Initiative