The new public management in international perspective: An analysis of impacts and effects

New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 274-292

  Pollitt, Christopher ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070295636     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203996362-23     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Boston, J. (1995) ‘Lessons from the Antipodes’. In O’Toole, B. and Jordan, G. (eds) Next Steps: improving management on government? Aldershot, Dartmouth, pp. 161-177.
2. Boyne, G. (1998) ‘Bureaucratic theory meets reality: public choice and service contracting in US local government’, Public Administration Review, 58: 6, pp. 474-484.
3. Brunsson, N. (1989) The Organisation Of Hypocrisy: talk, decisions and actions in organisations, Chichester, John Wiley.
4. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (1997) Next Steps: agencies in government: review, 1996, Cm 3579, London, The Stationery Office.
5. Chancellor of the Exchequer (1998) Modern Public Services for Britain: investing in reform, Cm 4011, London, The Stationery Office.
6. Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997) The Managerial State, London, Sage.
7. Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S. and McLaughlin, E. (eds) (2000) New Managerialism, New Welfare?, London, Sage.
8. Department of Health (2000) Departmental Report: the government’s expenditure plans, 2000-2001, Cm 4603, London, The Stationery Office.
9. Derlien, H-U (1998) From Administrative Reform to Administrative Modernization, Bamberg, Verwaltungswissenschaftliche Beitrage.
10. East, P. (1997) Opening Address to the Public Service senior Managers’ Conference, Wellington, NZ, 9 October.
11. Employment Service (1994) Employment Service: an evaluation of the effects of agency status 1990-1993, London, Employment Department Group.
12. Escott, K. and Whitfield, D. (1995) The Gender Impact of CCT in Local Government, Manchester, Equal Opportunities Commission.
13. Flynn, N. and Strehl, F. (eds) (1996) Public Sector Management in Europe, London, Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
14. General Accounting Office (1997) Performance Budgeting: past initiatives offer insights for GPRA implementation, GAO/AIMD-97-46, Washington, DC, GAO, 27 March.
15. General Accounting Office (1998) The Results Act: observations on the Department of State’s Fiscal Year 1999 Annual Performance Plan, GAO/NSIAD-98-210R, Washington DC, GAO.
16. Gore, A. (1996) The Best-kept Secrets in Government: a report to President Bill Clinton, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, National Performance Review.
17. Gore, A. (1997) Businesslike Government: lessons learned from America’s best companies, Washington, DC, National Performance Review.
18. Guyomarch, A. (1999) '“Public service�?, “public management�? and the “modernization�? of French public administration’, Public Administration, 77: 1, pp. 171-193
19. Hencke, D. (1998) ‘Jobcentres fiddled the figures’, The Guardian, 8 January, p. 2.
20. HM Treasury (1992) Executive Agencies: a guide to setting targets and measuring performance, London, HMSO.
21. Holkeri, K. and Summa, H. (1996) Contemporary Developments in Performance Management: evaluation of public management reforms in Finland: from ad hoc studies to a programmatic approach, paper presented to PUMA/OECD, 4-5 November, Paris.
22. Hood, C. (1996) ‘Exploring variations in public management reform of the 1980s’. In Bekke, H., Perry, J. and Toonen, T. (eds) Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, pp. 268-317.
23. Hood, C. (1998) The Art of the State: culture, rhetoric and public management, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
24. Ingraham, P., Thompson, J.R. and Sanders, P. (eds) (1998) Transforming Government: lessons from the reinvention laboratories, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
25. Jorgensen, T. (1999) ‘The public sector in an in-between time: searching for new public values’. Public Administration, 77: 3, pp. 565-584.
26. Kettl, D. (1994) Re-inventing Government? Appraising the National Performance Review, Washington DC, Brookings Institution Press.
27. Kettl, D. (2000) The Global Public Management Revolution: a report on the transformation of governance, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press.
28. Kickert, W. (ed.) (1997) Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
29. Kirkpatrick, I. (1999) ‘The worst of both worlds? Public services without markets or bureaucracy’. Public Money and Management 19: 41, pp. 9-14.
30. Konig, K. (1996) On the Critique of New Public Management, Speyer, Speyer Forschungsberichte, p. 155.
31. Lane, J-E. (ed.) (1997) Public Sector Reform: rationale, trends, problems, London, Sage.
32. Ministry of Finance (1997) Public Management Reforms: five country studies, Helsinki, Ministry of Finance.
33. Murray, R. (1998) Productivity as a Tool for Evaluation of Public Management Reform, paper presented to the European Evaluation Society Conference, Rome, 29-31 October.
34. Naschold, F. (1995) The Modernization of the Public Sector in Europe, Helsinki, Ministry of Labour.
35. Naschold, F. and von Otter, C. (1996) Public Sector Transformation: rethinking markets and hierarchies in government, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company.
36. National Audit Office (1998) Benefits Agency: performance measurement, HC9S2, London, The Stationery Office.
37. Next Steps Team (1998) Towards Best Practice: an evaluation of the first two years of the Public Sector benchmarking project, 1996-98, London, Efficiency and Effectiveness Group, The Cabinet Office.
38. OECD (1995) Governance in Transition: public management reforms in OECD countries, Paris, PUMA/OECD.
39. Olsen, J. and Peters, B. (eds) (1996) Lessons from Experience: experiential learning in administrative reforms in eight democracies, Oslo, Scandinavian University Press.
40. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
41. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation, London, Sage.
42. Peters, G. (1995) ‘Bureaucracy in a divided regime: the United States’. In Pierre, J. (ed.) Bureaucracy and the Modern State: an introduction to comparative public administration, Aldershot, Edward Elgar, pp. 18-38.
43. Peters, G. (1997) ‘A North American perspective on administrative modernisation in Europe’. In Kickert, W. (ed.) Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar. pp. 255-270.
44. Peters, G. and Savoie, D. (eds) (1998) Taking Stock: assessing public sector reforms, Montreal, Canadian Centre for Management Development/McGill-Queen’s University Press.
45. Pierre, J. (ed.) (1995) Bureaucracy in the Modern State: an introduction to comparative public administration, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
46. Pierson, P. (2000) ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review 94: 2, pp. 251-267.
47. Pollitt, C. (1993) Managerialism and the Public Services, Oxford, Blackwell.
48. Pollitt, C. (1995) ‘Justification by works or by faith? Evaluating the New Public Management’, Evaluation, 1: 2, pp. 133-154.
49. Pollitt, C. (1998) ‘Evaluation and the New Public Management: an international perspective’, Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 9: 1/2, pp. 7-15.
50. Pollitt, C. (2000) ‘How do we know how good public services are?'. In Peters, G. and Savoie, D. (eds) Revitalising the Public Service, Montreal and Kingston, Canadian Centre for Management Development and McGill/Queens University Press.
51. Pollitt, C. (2001) ‘Clarifying convergence: striking similarities and durable differences in management reform’, Public Management Review, 3: 4, pp. 1-22.
52. Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2000) Public Management Reform: a comparative analysis, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
53. Pollitt, C. and Summa, H. (1997) ‘Trajectories of reform: management change in four countries’, Public Money and Management, 17: 1, pp. 7-18.
54. Pollitt, C., Birchall, J. and Putman, K. (1998) Decentralising Public Service Management, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
55. Pollitt, C., Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H. and Waerness, M. (1999) Performance or Compliance? Performance audit and public management in five countries, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
56. Premfors, R. (1998) ‘Reshaping the democratic state: Swedish experiences in a comparative perspective’, Public Administration, 76: 1, pp. 141-159.
57. Prime Minister and Minister for the Cabinet Office (1999) Modernising Government, Cm 4310, London, The Stationery Office.
58. Rouban, L. (1995) ‘The civil service culture and administrative reform’. In Peters, B. and Savoie, D. (eds) Governance in a Changing Environment, Montreal and Kingston, Canadian Centre for Management Development and McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 23-54.
59. Savoie, D. (1994) Thatcher, Reagan, Mulroney: in search of a new bureaucracy, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
60. Schick, A. (1996) The Spirit of Reform: managing the New Zealand state sector in a time of change, Wellington, NZ, State Services Commission.
61. Siimes, S-A. (1999) ‘Personnel management also in the forefront’, Public Management in Finland, pp. 4-7.
62. Steering Group (1991) Review of State Sector Reforms, Auckland, State Services Commission.
63. Talbot, C. (1994) Re-inventing Public Management: a survey of public sector managers’ reactions to change, Corby, UK, Institute of Management.
64. Talbot, C. (1996) Ministers and Agencies: responsibility and performance, London, CIPFA.
65. Talbot, C. (1997) Public Performance: towards a public service excellence model, Discussion Paper No.1, Llantilio Crosseny, UK, Public Futures.
66. Task Force on Management Improvement (1992) The Australian Public Service Reformed: an evaluation of a decade of management reform, Canberra, Management Advisory Board, AGPS.
67. Trosa, S. (1995) Moderniser l’administration: comment font les autres? Paris, Les Editions d’Organisation.