Instructional design theory, research, and models

Instructional Design: International Perspectives: Theory, Research, and Models

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-16

  Tennyson, Robert D ^a   Schott, Franz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070016529     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. Aebli, H. (1985). Zwölf Grundformen des Lehrern. Eine Allgemeine Didaktik auf psychologischer Grundlage [Twelve basic forms of teaching. A general didactic on psychological basis] (3rd ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Klett
2. Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267-272
3. Becker, W. C., Engelmann, S., & Thomas, D. K. (1971). Teaching: A course of applied psychology. Chicago: SRA
4. Briggs, L.J. (1980). Thirty years of instructional design: One man's experience. Educational Technology, 20(2), 45-50
5. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton
6. Case, R. (1978). A developmentally based theory and technology of instruction. Review of Educational Research, 48, 439-469
7. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: Heath
8. Finn, J. D. (1957). Automation and education: General aspects. AV Communications Review, 5, 343-360
9. Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. New York: Van Nostrand
10. Frank, H., & Meder, B. S. (1971). Einführung in die kybernetische Pädagogik [Introduction in cybernetic pedagogy]. München, Germany: Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag
11. Gagné, R. M. (1962). The acquisition of knowledge. Psychological Review, 69, 355-365
12. Gagné, R. M. (1984). Learning outcomes and their effects: Useful categories of human performance. American Psychologist, 39, 377-385
13. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
14. Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L.J. (1974). Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
15. Gagné, R. M., & Dick, W. (1983). Instructional psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 261-295
16. Glaser, R. (1978). Introduction: Toward a psychology of instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 7-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
17. Glaser, R. (1990). The reemergence of learning theory within instructional research. American Psychologist, 45, 29-39
18. Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1989). Motivating the notion of generic design within information processing theory: The design problem space. A1 Magazine, 10, 19-36
19. Gropper, G. L. (1983). A behavioral approach to instructional prescription. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 279-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
20. Hannafin, M.J. (1995). Open-ended learning environments: Foundations, assumptions, and implications for automated design. In R. D. Tennyson & A. E. Barron (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Computer-based development and delivery tools (pp. 101-130). Berlin: Springer
21. Jonassen, D. H., Hannum, W. H., & Tessmer, M. (1989). Handbook of task analysis procedures. New York: Praeger
22. Klauer, K.J. (1969). Die Programmierte Instruktion auf dem Weg zu einer Technologie des Lehrens [Programmed instruction on the way to a technology of teaching]. In M. Irle (Ed.), Bericht über den 26. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie [Report No. 26, Congress of the German Psychological Association] (pp. 67-72). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe
23. Klauer, K.J. (1974). Methodik der Lehrzieldefinition und Lehrstoffanalyse [Methodology of defining educational goals and analyzing subject matter to be taught]. Düsseldorf, Germany: Schwann
24. Klauer, K J., Fricke, R., Herbig, M., Rupprecht, H., Sc Schott, F. (1972). Lehrziebrientierte Test [Educational goal-referenced tests]. Düsseldorf, Germany: Schwann
25. König, E., Sc Riedel, H. (1973). Systemtheoretische Didaktik [System-theoretic didactic]. Basel, Switzerland: Beltz
26. Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7-20
27. Kunz, G. C, Drewniak, U., & Schott, F. (1990). Analysis of self-regulation in learning from instructional text by means of computer-assisted video reconstruction (CaV). Poetics, 19, 191-220
28. L'Allier, J. J., & Tennyson, R. D. (1980). Principles of instructional design applied to an introductory course on educational computing. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 7, 26-32
29. Landa, L. N. (1969). Algorithmisierung im Unterricht [Algorithmization of instruction]. Berlin: Volk und Wissen
30. Landa, L. N. (1976). Instructional regulation and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology
31. Latzina, M., & Schott, F. (1995). Psychological processes of planning in instructional design teams: Some implications for automating instructional design. In R. D. Tennyson Sc A. E. Barron (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Computer-based development and delivery tools (pp. 131-148). Berlin: Springer
32. Lay, W. A. (1903). Experimenteik Didaktik. Ihre Grundlegung mit besonderer Rücksicht auf Muskelsinn, Wille und Tat [Experimental didactic. Its foundation with special considerations of senses of muscles, volition, and action]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Nemnich
33. Mager, R. F. (1962). Preparing objectives for programmed instruction. San Francisco: Fearon
34. McKeachie, W. (1974). The decline and fall of the laws of learning. Educational Researcher, 3, 7-11
35. Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 279-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
36. Merrill, M. D., Tennyson, R. D., & Posey, L. (1992). Concept teaching: An instructional design guide (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology
37. Meumann, E. (1914). Vorlesung zur Einführung in die experimentelle Pädagogik und ihre psychologischen Grundlagen. (3 Bände) [Lectures to an introduction in experimental padagogic and its psychological basis (3 volumes)]. Berlin: Engelmann
38. Moore, J. W. (1969). Instructional design: After behavioral objectives what? Educational Technology, 9(9), 45-48
39. Pirolli, P. (1992). Knowledge and processes in design: Final report (Office of Naval Research Report No. N00014-88-KO233). Berkeley: University of California
40. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 279-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
41. Reigeluth, C. M., & Darwazeh, A. N. (1982). The elaboration theory's procedures for designing instruction: A conceptual approach. Journal of Instructional Development, 5, 22-32
42. Scandura, J. M., & Scandura, A. B. (1980). Structural learning and concrete operations: An approach to Piagetian conservation. New York: Praeger
43. Schneider, G., & Schott, F. (1993, April). Linking knowledge and action through education in aesthetics: The rise of the German educational system at the end of the 18th century and its relevance for the present discussion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta
44. Schott, F. (1975). Lehrstoffanalyse-Ein Beschreibungssystem zur Analyse von Inhalt und Verhalten bei Lehrzielen [Analysis of subject to be taught-A descriptive system for analyzing content and behavior of educational goals]. Düsseldorf, Germany: Schwann
45. Schott, F. (1992a). The contributions of cognitive science and educational technology to the advancement of instructional design theory. Discussion of the Special Issue 'Educational technology: Four decades of research and theory' Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 55-57
46. Schott, F. (1992b). The useful representation of instructional objectives: A task analysis of task analysis. In S. Dijkstra, H. P. M. Krammer, & J. J. G. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Instructional models in computer-based learning environments (pp. 43-60). New York: Springer
47. Schott, F., & Latzina, M. (1992, April). PLANA, a method of generic task analysis for improving mental modeling and the transfer of learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco
48. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86-97
49. Tennyson, R. D. (1972). A review of experimental methodology in instructional task sequencing. AV Communications Review, 20, 147-159
50. Tennyson, R. D. (1990). Integrated instructional design theory: Advancements from cognitive science and instructional technology. Educational Technology, 30(8), 14-21
51. Tennyson, R. D. (1994). Automating instructional design, development, and delivery. Berlin: Springer
52. Tennyson, R. D., & Breuer, K. (1991). Complex-dynamic simulations to improve higher-order thinking strategies. Journal of Structural Learning, 11, 311-326
53. Tennyson, R. D., & Christensen, D. L. (1988). MAIS: An intelligent learning system. In D. H Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 247-274). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
54. Tennyson, R. D., & Cocchiarella, M. J. (1986). An empirically based instructional design theory for concept teacing. Review of Educational Research, 36, 40-71
55. Tennyson, R. D., Elmore, R. L., & Snyder, L. (1992). Advancements in instructional design theory: Contextual module analysis and integrated instructional strategies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 34-49
56. Tennyson, R. D., & Merrill, M. D. (1971). Hierarchial models in the development of a theory in instruction: A comparison of Bloom, Gagné, and Merrill. Educational Technology, 11(9), 27-30
57. Tennyson, R. D., & Park, O. (1980). The teaching of concepts: A review of instructional design research literature. Review of Educational Research, 50, 55-70
58. Tennyson, R. D., & Rasch, M. (1988). Linking cognitive learning theory to instructional prescriptions. Instructional Science, 17, 369-385
59. Thorndike, E. (1913). The psychology of learning: Educational psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Teachers College Press
60. Thorndike, E. (1924). Mental disciplines in high school studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, 1-22, 83-98
61. von Cube, F. (1968). Kybernetische Grundlagen des Lernens und Lehrens [Cybernetic foundations of learning and teaching]. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett
62. Wagenschein, M. (1959). Zum Begriff des Exemplarischen Lehrens [On the concept of teaching by example]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz