Implementing and Sustaining Strategies Instruction: Authentic and Effective Professional Development or "Business as Usual"?

Academic Strategy Instruction: A Special Issue of Exceptionality

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 3-23

  Boudah, Daniel J ^a   Blair, Ellen ^b   Mitchell, Vickie J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b Bryan Independent School District   (United States)

^c Region IV Educational Service Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070009364     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315046198-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Berdie, D. R., Anderson, J. F., & Niebuhr, M. A. (1986). Questionnaires: Design and use. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
2. Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research (4th ed.). New York; Longman.
3. Boudah, D. J., Lenz, B. K., Bulgren, J. A., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2000, January/February). Don’t water down! Enhance content learning through the unit organizer routine. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(3), 48-56.
4. Boudah, D. J., Logan, K. R., & Greenwood, C. R. (2001). The research to practice projects: Lessons learned about changing teacher practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 290-303.
5. Boudah, D. J., & Mitchell, V. J. (1998). The real thing. Journal of Staff Development, 19(2), 43-47.
6. Bradley, D. F., & West, J. F. (1994). Staff training for the inclusion of students with disabilities: Visions from school-based educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 117-128.
7. Bulgren, J. A., & Lenz, B. K. (1996). Strategic instruction in the content areas. In D. D. Deshler, E. S. Ellis, & B. K. Lenz (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed., pp. 409-473). Denver, CO: Love.
8. Bulgren, J. A., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1988). Effectiveness of a concept teaching routine in enhancing the performance of LD students in secondary-level mainstream classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 3-17.
9. Bulgren, J. A., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1994). The effects of a recall enhancement routine on the test performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9(1), 2-11.
10. Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In J. L. Graden, J. E. Curtis, & M. J. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 391-441). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
11. Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Alley, G. R., Warner, M. M., & Clark, F. L. (1982). Learning disabilities in adolescent and young adult populations: Research implications. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1-12.
12. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 126-137.
13. Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Fullan, M. G., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What's worth fighting for in your school? New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15, 5-12.
16. Hunsaker, L., & Johnston, M. (1992). Teacher under construction: A collaborative case study of teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 350-372.
17. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
18. Kaestle, C. (1993). The awful reputation of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 23-31.
19. Lenz, B. K.., Bulgren, J. A., Sehumaker, J. B., Dcshler, D. D., & Boudah, D. J. (1994). The content enhancement series: The unit organizer routine. Lawrence, K.S: Edge Enterprises.
20. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Loucks-Horsley, S., Harding, C. K., Arbuckle, M. A., Murray, L. B., Dubea, C., & Williams, M. K., (1987). Continuing to learn: A guidebook for teacher development. Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands.
22. Mcrriam, S. B. (1986). The research to practice dilemma. Columbus, OH: National Center Publications, National Center for Research in Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED278801)
23. Mcyerson, M. J. (1993). Exploring reading instructional decisions through a reflective activity: A first step in the change process. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 4, 153-168.
24. National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching. (2000). Revisioning professional development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
25. Sehumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1984). Setting demand variables: A major factor in program planning for LD adolescents. Topics in Language Disorders, 4, 224-4.
26. Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1995). Meaningful professional development in accommodating students with disabilities: Lessons learned. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 344-353.
27. Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 4024-35). New York: Macmillan.
28. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities: Twentieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs.