On different facets of mathematical thinking

The Nature of Mathematical Thinking

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 253-284

  Dreyfus, Tommy ^a   Eisenberg, Theodore ^b  

^a HOLON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069996985     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Albers, D. J. (1982). Paul Halmos: Maverick mathologist. College Mathematics Journal, 13, 226-242
2. Albers, D. J., & Reid, C. (1988). An interview with Mary Ellen Rudin. College Mathematics Journal, 19, 115-137
3. Bell, E. T. (1937). Men of mathematics. New York: Simon & Schuster
4. Bondesan, M. G., & Ferrari, P. L. (1991). The active comparison of strategies in problem-solving: An exploratory study. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Coriference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. I, pp. 168-175). Genova, Italy: U Press
5. Chevallard, Y. (1985). The didactic trampositionfrom the scientific knowledge to the knowledge being taught. Grenoble, France: La pensee sauvage
6. Courant, R., & Robbins, H. (1941). What is mathematics? London: Oxford University Press
7. Davidson, N. (1986). Cooperative learning in mathematics. London: Addison-Wesley
8. Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston: Birkhiiuser
9. Dreyfus, T. (1987). Approximation of area under a curve: A conceptual approach. Mathematics Teacher, 80(7), 538-543
10. Dreyfus, T. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25-41). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
11. Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1990). Symmetry in mathematics learning. Zentralblattfiir Didaktik der Mathematik, 22(2), 53-59
12. Educational Testing Service. (1988). Report on the Advanced Placement Examinations. Princeton, NJ: Author
13. Eisenberg, T., & Dreyfus, T. (1994). On understanding how students learn to visualize function transformations. Research on Collegiate Mathematics Education, I, 45-68
14. Everybody Counts. (1989). A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
15. Eves, H. (1964). An introduction to the history of mathematics (rev. ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
16. Feynman, R. (1989). Surely you're joking Mr. Feynman. New York: Bantam
17. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38
18. Gillman, L. (1994). Can students solve math problems? Focus, the Newsletter of the MAA, 14(3), 12-13
19. Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
20. Halmos, P. (1968). Mathematics as a creative art. American Scientist, 56, 375-389
21. Hardy, G. H. (1940). A mathematician's apology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
22. Harel, G., & Kaput, J. (1991). The role of conceptual entities and their symbols in building advanced mathematical concepts. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 82-94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
23. Harris, C. (1971). On proofs of the irrationality offf. Mathematics Teacher, 64(1), 19-21
24. Hershkowitz, R., Friedlander, A., & Dreyfus, T. (1991). Loci and visual thinking. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Coriference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. II, pp. 181-188). Genova, Italy: U Press
25. Jackson, A. (1988). Research mathematicians in mathematics education: The national scene. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 35(8), 1123-1131
26. Krauthammer, C. (1990, Feb. 5). Education: Doing bad and feeling good. Time Magazine, p. 78
27. Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking mathematically. London: Addison-Wesley
28. Moritz, R. E. (1914). Memorabilia mathematica. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America
29. Orton, A. (1992). Learning mathematics: Issues, theory and cla5sroom practice. London: Cassell
30. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
31. Polya, G. (1965). Mathematical discovery (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley
32. Polya, G., & Szego, G. (1972). Problem5 and theorems in analysis (Translation and expansion of Aufgaben und Lehrsiitze aus der Analysis, published 1924). New York: Springer
33. Presmeg, N. (I 986). Visualization in high-school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6, 42-46
34. Schoenfeld, A., Smith, J., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, 55-177). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
35. Schwarz, B., & Dreyfus, T. (1995). New actions on old objects: A new ontological perspective on functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(3), 259-291
36. Schwarz, B., Dreyfus, T., & Bruckheimer, M. (1990). A model of the function concept in a three-fold representation. Computers and Education, /4(3), 249-262
37. Selden, A., Selden, J., & Mason, A. (1994). Even good calculus students can't solve nonroutine problems. In J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research issues in undergraduate mathematics learning (MAA Notes Series Vol. 33, pp. 19-26). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America
38. Tall, D., & Thomas, M. (1991). Encouraging versatile thinking in algebra using the computer. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(2), 125-147
39. Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, /2(2), 151-169
40. Thompson, P. W. (1990). A theoretical model of quantity based reasoning in arithmetic and algebra (Tech. Rep. No. 101). Normal: Illinois State University
41. Treisman, U. (1992). New approaches to the mathematical education of minorities in the United States. In C. Gaulin, B. R. Hodgson, D. H. Wheeler, & J. C. Egsgard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Mathematical Education (p. 376). Quebec, Canada: Les presses de l'universite Laval
42. Usiskin, Z. (1990). If everybody counts, why do so few survive? University of Chicago School Mathematics Project Newsletter, 6, 5-11
43. Van der Waerden, B. L. (1927). Beweis einer Baudetschen Vermutung. Nieuw Archie[ voor Wiskunde, 15, 212-216
44. Vander Waerden, B. L. (1954). Einfa/1 und Uberlegung: Drei kleine Beitriige zur Psychologie des mathematischen Denkens. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser
45. Zimmermann, W., & Cunningham, S. (Eds.). (1991). Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics (MAA Notes Series, Vol. 19). Providence, RI: Mathematical Association of America