Towards an ‘appropriate metrology’ of human action in archaeology

Time, Process and Structured Transformation in Archaeology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 426-448

  Wobst, H Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069808690     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315887708-26     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Binford, L.R. 1964. A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity 29, 424-41.
2. Binford, L.R. 1965. Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process. American Antiquity 31, 203-10.
3. Binford, L.R. 1967. Smudge pits and hide smoking: the use of analogy in archaeological reasoning. American Antiquity 32, 1-12.
4. Binford, L.R. 1968. Archaeological perspectives. In New Perspectives in Archaeology, S.R. Binford and L.R. Binford (eds), 5-32. Chicago: Aldine.
5. Binford, L.R. 1972. Contemporary model building: paradigms and the current state of palaeolithic research. In Models in Archaeology, D.L. Clarke (ed.), 109-66. London: Methuen.
6. Binford, L.R. 1977. General introduction. In For Theory Building in Archaeology, L.R. Binford (ed.), 1-10. New York: Academic Press.
7. Binford, L.R. and S.R. Binford 1966. A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian of Levallois facies. American Anthropologist 68, 238-95.
8. Binford, S.R., and L.R. Binford 1969. Stone tools and human behaviour. Scientific American 220, 70-84.
9. Binford, L.R., S.R. Binford, R. Whallon and M.A. Hardin (eds) 1970. Archaeology at Hatchery West (Memoir 24). Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.
10. Binford, L.R. and J.A. Sabloff 1982. Paradigms, systematics and archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research 38, 137-53.
11. Briggs, C.L. 1986. Learning How To Ask: a socio-linguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cowgill, G.L. 1968. Computer analysis of archaeological data from Teotihuacan, Mexico. In New Perspectives in Archaeology, S.R. Binford and L.R. Binford (eds), 143-50. Chicago: Aldine.
13. Douglas, M.1966. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14. Douglas, M.1970. Natural Symbols. London: Barrie and Rockliff.
15. Flannery, K.V. (ed.) 1976. The Early Mesoamerican Village. New York: Academic Press.
16. Freeman, L.G. 1964 Mousterian Developments in Cantabrian Spain. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.
17. Freeman, L.G. 1966 The nature of Mousterian facies in Cantabrian Spain. American Anthropologist 68, 230-237.
18. Freeman, L. G. 1973. The analysis of some occupation floor distributions from earlier and middle Paleolithic sites in Spain. Paper presented at the IXth International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Chicago, USA.
19. Fritz, J.M. and F.T. Plog 1970. The nature of archaeological explanation. American Antiquity 35, 405-12.
20. Gelfand, A.E. 1971. Rapid seriation methods with archaeological applications. In Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, F.R. Hodson, D.G. Kendall and P. Tautu (eds), 186-201. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
21. Giddens, A. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.
22. Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan Press.
23. Gumerman, G.J. (ed.) 1971. The Distribution of Prehistoric Population Aggregates. Prescott, Ariz.: Prescott College Anthropological Reports 1.
24. Hempel, C.G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.
25. Hempel, C.G. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
26. Hill, J.N. 1965. Broken K Pueblo: a prehistoric society in eastern Arizona. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.
27. Hill, J.N. 1968. Broken K Pueblo: patterns of form and function. In New Perspectives in Archaeology, S.R. Binford and L.R. Binford (eds), 103-42. Chicago: Aldine.
28. Hill, J.N. 1970. Broken K Pueblo: prehistoric social organization in the American Southwest. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
29. Hodder, I. 1982a. Symbols in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hodder, I. (ed.) 1982b. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Hodder, I. 1982c. Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, I. Hodder (ed.), 1-16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Hodder, I. 1985. Post-processual archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8, 1-26
33. Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Hodder, I. (ed.) 1987a. Archaeology as Long-term History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Hodder, I. (ed.) 1987b. The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. LeBlanc, S.A. 1973. Two points of logic concerning data, hypotheses, general laws, and systems. In Research and Theory in Current Archaeology, C. R. Redman (ed.), 199-214. New York: John Wiley.
38. Longacre, W.A. 1963. Archaeology as anthropology: a case study. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology. University of Chicago.
39. Longacre, W.A. 1970. Archaeology as Anthropology: a case study. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
40. Miller, D. 1984. Modernism and suburbia as material ideology. In Ideology, Power and Prehistory, D. Miller and C. Tilley (eds), 37-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Miller, D. and C. Tilley (eds) 1984. Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Montet-White, A. 1973. he Malpas rockshelter. Lawrence: University of Kansas (Publications in Anthropology No. 4).
43. Moore, H.L. 1982. The interpretation of spatial patterning in settlement residues. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, I. Hodder (ed.), 74-79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Moore, H.L. 1986. Space, Text and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Moore, J.A. and A.S. Keene (eds) 1983. Archaeological Hammers and Theories. New York: Academic Press.
46. Neustupny, E. 1973. Factors determining the variability of the Corded Ware culture. In The Explanation of Culture Change, A.C. Renfrew (ed.), 725-30. London: Duckworth.
47. Parker Pearson, M. 1982. Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnoarchaeological study. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, I. Hodder (ed.), 99-113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Plog, F.T. 1969. An approach to the study of prehistoric change. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.
49. Plog, F.T. 1974. The Study of Prehistoric Change. New York: Academic Press.
50. Pollnac, R. and A.J. Ammerman 1973. A multivariate analysis of late palaeolithic assemblages in Italy. In The Explanation of Culture Change, A.C. Renfrew (ed.), 161-65. London: Duckworth.
51. Ragir, S. 1967. A review of techniques for archaeological sampling. In A Guide to Field Methods in Archaeology, R.F. Heizer and J.A. Graham (eds), pp 181-98. Palo Alto: National Press.
52. Redman, C.L. and P.J. Watson 1970. Systematic intensive surface collection. American Antiquity 35, 279-91.
53. Rowlett, R.M. and R.B. Pollnac 1971. Multivariate analysis of Marnian La Tene cultural groups. In Mathematics- in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, F.R. Hodson, D.G. Kendall and P. Tautu (eds), 46-58. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
54. Shanks, M. and C. Tilley 1987a. Re-constructing Archaeology. Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Shanks, M. and C. Tilley 1987b. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
56. Shennan, S. 1988. Quantifying Archaeology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
57. Speth, J.D. and G.A. Johnson 1976. Problems in the use of correlation for the investigation of tool kits and activity areas. In Cultural Change and Continuity. Essays in honour of James Bennett Griffin, C. E. Cleland (ed.), 35-57. New York: Academic Press.
58. Sterud, E. 1967. Seriation techniques in archaeology. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.
59. Thomas, D.H. Jr. 1971. Prehistoric subsistence-settlement patterns of the Reese River valley, central Nevada. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis.
60. Tilley, C. 1984. Social formation, social structures and social change. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, I. Hodder (ed.), 26-38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Watson, P.J., S.A. LeBlanc and C.L. Redman 1971. Explanation in Archaeology. An explicitly scientific approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
62. Whallon, R. 1963. A statistical analysis of some Aurignacian I assemblages from southwestern France. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.
63. Wobst, H.M. 1971. Boundary conditions for paleolithic cultural systems: a simulation approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
64. Wobst, H.M. 1978. The archaeo-ethnology of hunter-gatherers, or the tyranny of the ethnographic record in archaeology. American Antiquity 43, 303-9.
65. Wobst, H.M. and A.S. Keene 1983. Archaeological explanation as political economy. In The Socio-politics of Archaeology, J. M. Gero, D. M. Lacy, and M. L. Blakey (eds), 79-88. Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts (Anthropological Research Report no. 23).
66. Wylie, A. 1989. The interpretative dilemma. In Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology, V. Pinsky and A. Wylie (eds), 18-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Zubrow, E. 1971. A south-western test of an anthropological model of population dynamics. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.