The friendly phone

Wired Up: Young People and the Electronic Media

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 134-151

  Gillard, Patricia ^a   Wale, Karen ^a   Bow, Amanda ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069802574     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203984970-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. BRYCE, J. W. (1987) ‘Family time and television use’, in T. R. LINDLOF (ed.) Natural Audiences: Qualitative Research of Media Uses and Effects, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2. BRYCE, J. W. and LEICHTER, H. J. (1983) ‘The family and television. Forms of mediation,’ Journal of Family Issues, 4:309-28.
3. DENZIN, N. (1992) Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
4. GILLARD, P. (1992) ‘A new theory of parental control of children’s television viewing’, in B. TICEHURST (ed.) Communication Australia: A Search for Meaning in Changing Times, Sydney: Griffin Publications.
5. GILLARD, P., Bow, A. and WALE, K. (1994) A Major Line to the Outside World From the House: Defining the Significance of Telecommunications in Social Contexts, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne: Telecommunications Needs Research Group.
6. GILLARD, P., Bow, A. and WALE, K. (1995) Privacy and Control: Social Indicators of Interest in Future Telecommunications, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne: Telecommunications Needs Research Group.
7. GILLARD, P., Bow, A. and WALE, K. (1996) Ladies and Gentlemen, Boys and Girls: Gender and Telecommunications Services, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne: Telecommunications Needs Research Group.
8. JACKA, E. (1994) ‘Researching audiences: A dialogue between cultural studies and social science’, Media Information Australia, 73:45-51.
9. LARSON, R. (1995) ‘Secrets in the bedroom: Adolescents’ private use of media’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24:535-48.
10. LIVINGSTONE, S. (1992) ‘The meaning of domestic technologies: A personal construct analysis of familial gender relations’, in R. SILVERSTONE and E. HIRSCH (eds) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, London: Routledge.
11. LOFLAND, J. (1995) ‘Analytic ethnography. Features, failings and futures’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24:30-67.
12. MILLER, G. (1994) ‘Toward ethnographies of institutional discourse. Proposal and suggestions’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23:280-306.
13. MOYAL, A. (1989) ‘The feminine culture of the telephone. People, patterns and policy’, Prometheus, 7:5-31.
14. MURRAY, G. (1994) How’s the World Been Treating You? Telecommunications Cultures and the Autonomous Call, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne: Telecommunications Needs Research Group.
15. PALMER, P. (1986) Girls and Television, Sydney: New South Wales Ministry of Education.
16. PALMER, P. (1988) ‘The social nature of children’s television viewing’, in P. DRUMMOND and R. PATERSON (eds) Television and Its Audience: International Research Perspectives, London: British Film Institute.
17. ROLLINS, A. (1996) ‘Teens ring up costs on cellular phones’, The Sunday Age, 16 June: 8.
18. SILVERSTONE, R., HIRSCH, E. and MORLEY, D. (1992) ‘Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household’ in R. SILVERSTONE and E. HIRSCH (eds) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, London: Routledge.
19. SINGH, S., Bow, A. and WALE, K. (1997) Centre for International Research on Communication and Information Technologies (CIRCIT) Research Report, Melbourne: CIRCIT.
20. SKELTON, F. (1989) ‘Teenagers and the telephone’, Australian Journal of Communication, 15:21-24.
21. VORDERER, P. and GROEBEN, N. (1992) ‘Audience research: What the humanistic and the social science approaches could learn from each other’, Poetics, 21:361-76.