Introduction: The destruction and conservation of cultural property

Destruction and Conservation of Cultural Property

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-21

  Layton, Robert ^a   Thomas, Julian ^b  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069556447     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203165096-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Axelrod, R. 1990. The Evolution of Co-operation. Harmondsworth: Penguin (first published 1984 New York: Basic Books).
2. Barth, F. 1959. Segmentary opposition and the theory of games. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 89: 5-21.
3. Barth, F. 1966. Models of Social Organization. London: Royal Anthropological Institute.
4. Bauman, Z. 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Bender, B. 1998. Stonehenge: Making Space. London: Berg.
6. Benjamin, W. 1992. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In W. Benjamin, Illuminations, pp. 211-44. London: Fontana.
7. Berman, M. 1982. All That is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. London: Verso.
8. Carroll, J. 1993. Humanism: The Wreck of Western Culture. London: Fontana.
9. Clifford, J. 1988. Identity in Mashpee. In J. Clifford, The Predicament of Culture, pp. 277-346.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Denich, B. 1994. Dismembering Yugoslavia: nationalist ideologies and the symbolic revival of genocide. American Ethnologist 21: 367-90.
11. Evans, R.J. 1997. In Defence of History. London: Granta.
12. Finney, P. 1998. Ethics, historical relativism and Holocaust denial. Rethinking History 2: 359-70.
13. Gray, J. 1995. Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age. London: Routledge.
14. Grover, B.R. and Grover, A. [1998] The Rama Temple at Awadh (Ayodhya) and the historical records of its destruction based on the testimony of the Muslim scholars and Western sources. Paper presented at Bra�?.
15. Guldescu, S. 1964. History of Medieval Croatia. The Hague: Mouton.
16. Habib, I. 1998. Unreason and archaeology: the ‘painted grey ware’ and beyond. In K.M. Shrimali (ed.) Reason and Archaeology, pp. 17-27. Delhi: Association for the Study of History and Archaeology, Department of History, University of Delhi.
17. Hall, M. 1998. Blackbirds and black butterflies. Unpublished ms.
18. Hammel, E.A. 1997. Ethnicity and politics: Yugoslav lessons for home. Anthropology Today 13 (3): 5-14.
19. Heidegger, M. 1971. The origin of the work of art. In M. Heidegger, Poetry, Language, Thought, pp. 15-88. New York: Harper & Row.
20. Hubert, J. 1988. The disposition of the dead. World Archaeological Bulletin 2: 12-39.
21. Jones, S. 1996. The Archaeology of Ethnicity. London: Routledge.
22. Keay, J. 2000. India: A History. London: HarperCollins.
23. Kellner, H. 1997. ‘Never again’ isnow. In K. Jenkins(ed.) The Postmodern History Reader, pp. 397-412. London: Routledge.
24. Kitchen, W. 1998. From Croatia to Cape Town: the future of the World Archaelogy Congress. Antiquity 72.
25. Lal, B.B. 1976-7. Indian archaeology -a review. Archaeological Survey of India, 52-53.
26. Lal, B.B. 1981. The two Indian epics vis-à-vis archaeology. Antiquity 55: 27-34.
27. Lipstadt, D. 1994. Denying the Holocaust: The Assault on Truth and Memory. New York: Plume.
28. Lyotard, J.F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
29. McCullagh, C.B. 1998. The Truth of History. London: Routledge.
30. Mandal, D. 1993. Ayodhya: Archaeology after Destruction. London: Sangam/Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
31. Mouffe, C. 1996. Deconstruction, pragmatism and the politics of democracy. In C. Mouffe (ed.) Deconstruction and Pragmatism, pp. 1-12. London: Routledge.
32. Olsen, B. 1991. Metropolises and satellites in archaeology: on power and asymmetry in global archaeological discourse. In R.W. Preucel (ed.) Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, pp. 211-24. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
33. Ramachandran, K.S. n.d. Ram Janmabhoomi and the Marxist historians, parts1-3. Delhi: Historians’ Forum.
34. Rao, N. 1994. Letter to the editor, Economic and Political Weekly, 20 December 1994.
35. Rao, N. 1995. Ethics, archaeology and World Archaeological Congress. Economic and Political Weekly, 15 July 1995, 1725-8.
36. Ratnagar, S. 1993. Introduction. In D. Mandal (ed.) Ayodhya: Archaeology after Destruction, pp. 1-15. London: Sangam/Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
37. Sharma, Y.D., Srivastava, K.M., Gupta, S.P., Nautiyal, K.P., Grover, B.R., Agrawal, D.S., Mukherji, S. and Malayya, S. [1992]. Ramajanma Bhumi: Ayodhya. New Archaeological Discoveries. New Delhi: Historians’ Forum.
38. Sharma, R.S., Athar Ali, M., Jha, D.N. and Bhan, S. 1994. A historian’s report to the nation. In Selected Writings on Communalism, pp. 48-65. New Delhi: People’s Publishing House.
39. Strathern, M. 1996. Cutting the network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2: 517-35.
40. Tanner, M. 1997. Croatia: a Nation Forged in War. New Haven: Yale University Press.
41. White, H. 1997. Historical emplotment and the problem of truth. In K. Jenkins (ed.) The Postmodern History Reader, pp. 392-6. London: Routledge.
42. Yoffee, N. and Sherratt, A. 1993. Introduction: the sources of archaeological theory. In N. Yoffee and A. Sherratt (eds) Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?, pp. 1-10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.