Modeling Dyadic Data with Binary Latent Factors

NIPS 2006: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 977-984

  Meeds, Edward ^a   Neal, Radford ^a   Ghahramani, Zoubin ^b   Roweis, Sam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATRIX FACTORIZATION;

BAYESIAN PROBABILISTIC MODELS; BICLUSTERING; BINARY MATRIX; CLUSTERING MODEL; LATENT FACTOR; LATENT VARIABLE; MATRIX; MATRIX DECOMPOSITION; MATRIX FACTORIZATIONS; NON-PARAMETRIC BAYESIAN;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

EID: 85069300650     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. P. Dayan and R. S. Zemel. Competition and multiple cause models. Neural Computation, 7(3), 1995.
2. P. Foldiak. Forming sparse representations by local anti-Hebbian learning. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 1990.
3. Z. Ghahramani. Factorial learning and the EM algorithm. In NIPS, volume 7. MIT Press, 1995.
4. T. R. Golub, D. K. Slonim, P. Tamayo, C. Huard, M. Gaasenbeek, J. P. Mesirov, H. Coller, M. L. Loh, J. R. Downing, M. A. Caligiuri, C. D. Bloomfield, and E. S. Lander. Molecular classification of cancer: Class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science, 286(5439), 1999.
5. T. Griffiths and Z. Ghahramani. Infinite latent feature models and the Indian buffet process. In NIPS, volume 18. MIT Press, 2005.
6. J. A. Hartigan. Direct clustering of a data matrix. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 1972.
7. G. Hinton and R. S. Zemel. Autoencoders, minimum description length, and Helmholtz free energy. In NIPS, volume 6. Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.
8. S. Jain and R. M. Neal. Splitting and merging for a nonconjugate Dirichlet process mixture model. To appear in Bayesian Analysis.
9. C. Kemp, J. B. Tenebaum, T. L. Griffiths, T. Yamada, and N. Ueda. Learning systems of concepts with an infinite relational model. Proceedings of the Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2006.
10. L. Lazzeroni and A. Owen. Plaid models for gene expression data. Statistica Sinica, 12, 2002.
11. J. Pitman. Combinatorial stochastic processes. Lecture Notes for St. Flour Course, 2002.
12. E. Saund. A multiple cause mixture model for unsupervised learning. Neural Computation, 7(1), 1994.
13. R. Tibshirani, T. Hastie, M. Eisen, D. Ross, D. Botstein, and P. Brown. Clustering methods for the analysis of DNA microarray data. Technical report, Stanford University, 1999. Department of Statistics.