Content Validity

Encyclopedia of Social Measurement

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 495-498

  McGartland Rubio, Doris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069290699     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00397-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (9)

1. Anastasi A., Urbina S. Psychological Testing 1997, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 7th Ed.
2. Davis L. Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts. Appl. Nurs. Res. 1992, 5:194-197.
3. Grant J.S., Davis L.L. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res. Nurs. Health 1997, 20:269-274.
4. Hubley A.M., Zumbo B.D. A dialectic on validity: Where we have been and where we are going. J. Gen. Psychol. 1996, 123:207-215.
5. Lynn M. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs. Res. 1986, 35:382-385.
6. Messick S. Validity. Educational Measurement 1989, 13-103. Macmillan, New York. 3rd Ed. R.L. Linn (Ed.).
7. Nunnally J.C., Bernstein I.H. Psychometric Theory 1994, McGraw-Hill, New York. 3rd Ed.
8. Rubio D.M., Berg-Weger M., Tebb S.S., Lee E.S., Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. J. Soc. Work Res. 2003, 27:94-104.
9. Shepard L.A. Evaluating test validity. Rev. Res. Educ. 1994, 19:405-450.