High technology employment, wages and university r&d spillovers: evidence from us cities

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 57-78

  Acs, Zoltan J ^a   Fitzroy, Felix R ^b   Smith, Ian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^b Department of Economics   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clusters; Employment; Externalities; High technology; R D spillovers

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068293193     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438599900000004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D.B., and Feldman, F., 1994. R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size. Review of Ecorzonzics arzd Statistics., 76: 336-340.
2. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., and Feldman, F., 1992. Real Effect of Academic Research: Comment. American Economic Review., 82 (1): 363-367.
3. Acs, Z. J., 1996. “ American High Technology Clusters. ”. In Evolutionary Economics and the New Internrrtional Political Economy, Edited by: de la Mote, J., and Paquet, G., 183-219. London: Pinter.
4. Almeida, P., and Kogut, B., 1994. “ Technology and Geography: The Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Patent Holders ”. In Department of Management, Wharton School: University of Pennsylvania.
5. Anselin, L., Varga A., A., and Acs Z, J., 1997. Local Geographical Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Innovations. Journul of Urhan Economics, 42: 422-448.
6. Audretsch, D.B., and Feldman, M. P., 1996. Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. Anlerican Econornic Review, 86 (3): 630-640.
7. Audretsch, D. B., and Stephan, P.E., 1996. Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology. American Economic Review, 86 (3): 641-652.
8. Audretsch, D. B., and Vivarelli, M., 1996. Small Firms and R&D Spillovers: Evidence from Italy. Small Business Economics, 8 (3): 249-258.
9. Bania, N., Eberts, R., and Fogany, M., The Role of Technical Capital in Regional Growth, presented at the Western Economic Association Meetings.
10. Bania, N., Eberts, R., and Fogarty, M., 1993. Universities and the Start-Up of New Companies: Can We Generalize from Route 128 and Silicon Valley?. Review of Economics anrl Stcrtistics, 75: 761-766.
11. Beeson, P., and Montgomery, E., 1993. The Effects of Colleges and Universities on Local Labor Markets. Review of Economics and Statisrics, 75: 753-761.
12. 1994. Why Are We So Afraid of Growth?. Cover Story, May 16th: 62-72.
13. Edwards, K. L., and Gordon, T. J., 1984. “ Characterization of Innovations Introduced in the US Market in 1982, The Futures Group. Report prepared for the U.S. ”. In Small Business Administration, The Futures Group Washington, D.C.
14. Feldman, Maryann. 1994. The Geography of Innovation, Boston: Kluwer.
15. 1992. Growth in Cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100 (6): 1126-1152.
16. Heckman, J.J., 1979. Sample Solution Bias as Specification Error. Ecorzometricn, 47: 153-162.
17. Henderson, J.V., 1994. Where does an Industry Locate?. Journal of Urban Economics, 35: 83-104.
18. Henderson, V., A. Kuncoro and M. Turner (1992) Industrial Development in Cities, NBER Working paper No. 4178.
19. Jaffe, A.B., 1989. Real Effects of Academic Research. Alnericcm Economic Review, 79 (5): 957-970.
20. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R., 1993. Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics,: 577-598.
21. Jacobs, J., 1969. The Econotny of Cities., New York: Vintage.
22. Krugman, P., 1991. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99 (3): 483-499.
23. Levin, R.C., and et, al., 1987. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 783-820.
24. Link, A. N., and Rees, J., 1990. Firm Size, University Based Research, and the Returns to R&D. Small Business Economics, 2 (1): 25-31.
25. Lumme, A. et al. (1993) New Technology Based Companies in Cambridge in an International Perspective, Working Paper No. 35, Small Busmess Research Center, University of Cambridge.
26. Lund, L., 1986. “ Locating Corporate R&D Facilities ”. In Conference Board Report No. 892, Conference Board New York
27. Mansfiled, E., 1995. Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics and Financing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77: 55-65.
28. Nelson, R. R., 1986. Institutions Supporting Technical Advance in Industry. American Econontrc Review, Papers and Proceedings, 76 (2): 186-189.
29. Parker, D. D., and Zilberman, D., 1993. University Technology Transfers: Impacts on Local and U.S. Economies. Contemporary Policy Issues, Xl (2): 87-99.
30. Romer, P. M., 1990. Endogenous Technical Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98: S72-102.
31. Shachar, A., and Felsenstein, D., 1992. Urban Economic Development and High Technology Industry. Urban Studies. 29 (6): 839-855.
32. Storey, D. J., and S. Theter, B., 1998. Public Policy measures to support new Technology-based firms in The European Union. Research Policy, 26: 1037-1057.
33. Varga, A., 1998. “ University Resenrclz and Regional Innovation: A Special Econometric Analysis of Academic !wowledge transfer ”. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Westhead, P., and J. Storey, D., 1995. Links Between Higher Education Institutions and High Technology Firms. Omega. International Journal of Management Science, 23 (4): 345-360.