Constraints on young people's use of the theatre: An empirical analysis using the ‘how much? Project’ at Sheffield theatres

International Journal of Cultural Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 369-396

  Taylor, Peter ^a   Owen, Elizabeth ^b   Withnall, Sophie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c West Yorkshire Arts Marketing   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068167105     PISSN: 10286632     EISSN: 14772833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10286630009358151     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ACE. 21 September 1998. Bringing New Art to New People, 21 September, ACE. Press Release
2. ACE. 10 February 1999. Arias For All!: Opera companies reach out to new people as part of the Arts Council's New Audiences Programme., 10 February, ACE. Press Release
3. Arts Business. 11 May 1998. Culture Secretary details £5m ‘New Audiences’ programme 11 May.
4. Arts Business. 1999. Scheme is no secret, 30 August
5. Blamires, C., 1995. Pricing Research Manual., Arts Council of England.
6. BMRB. 1998. Target Group Index and Cultural Activities in GB., Ominibus Survey, British Market Research Bureau.
7. Centre for Leisure Research. 1993. The impact of variations in charges on usage levels at local authority sports facilities: four case studies., Scottish Sports Council Research report 35 Edited by: Best, J., Scottish Sports Council.
8. Coalter, F., 1993. Sports participation: price or priorities?. Leisure Studies, 12(3): 171–182.
9. Christopher, M., Payne, A., and Ballantyne, D., 1991. Relationship Marketing: bringing quality, customer service and marketing together., Butterworth Heinemann.
10. Connexions. 1990. Young People and Theatre Going., Arts Council of Great Britain.
11. Define. 1998. Youth Research., MAX.
12. Diggle, K., 1984. Guide to Arts Marketing: The Principles and Practice of Marketing as they apply to the arts., Rhinegold Publishing Ltd.
13. Evans, G., 1999. The economics of the national performing arts—exploiting consumer surplus and willingness‐to‐pay: a case of cultural policy failure?. Leisure Studies, 18(2): 97–118.
14. Gratton, C., and Taylor, P. D., 1995. From economic theory to leisure practice via empirics: the case of demand and price. Leisure Studies, 14(4): 245–262.
15. Harland, J., Kinder, K., and Hartley, K., 1995. Arts in Their View: A study of youth participation in the arts., National Foundation for Education Research.
16. Hill, E., O'Sullivan, C., and O'Sullivan, T., 1995. Creative Arts Marketing., Butterworth‐Heinemann.
17. Kirchberg, V., 1998. Entrance fees as a subjective barrier to visiting museums. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22(1): 1–13.
18. Kolb, B. M., 1997. Pricing as the key to attracting students to the performing arts. Journal of Cultural Economics, 21(2): 139–146.
19. Millward Brown International. 1991. Pricing the Arts Report., Arts Council of Great Britain.
20. Matarasso, F., 1997. Use or Ornament? The Social Impact of Participation in the Arts., Comedia.
21. Museums and Galleries Commission. 1999. To Charge or not to charge?, MGC.
22. Newman, D., 1986. Subscibe Now!: Building Arts Audiences Through Dynamic Subscription Promotion., Theatre Communications Group.
23. Northern Arts Marketing Co Ltd. 1993. An analysis of perceived and actual barriers to theatre‐going as experienced by C1 and C2 potential attenders., Northern Arts.
24. Owen, E., An Investigation of Students’ Perceptions of the Subsidised Arts in Sheffield. Customer Relationship Management, 1(4)285–290.
25. ONS. 1998. Family Expenditure Survey 1997–98., HMSO.
26. Pieda. 1996. People Taking Part: Access Case Studies, Department of National Heritage.
27. Research Surveys of Great Britain. 1994. Youth Audience Research Report., ACE.