Computer Generated Architectural Images: a comparative study

Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 552-556

  Bassanino, May Nahab ^a   Brown, Andre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

factors; image type; medium; presentation technique; SD scales; subject

Indexed keywords

EID: 85067703194     PISSN: 26841843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Bassanino M N (1999). The Perception of Computer generated Architectural Images. PhD Thesis. The University of Liverpool. United Kingdom.
2. Brown A G P and Horton F (1992). Computer Aids for Design Development. In: Penz F (ed.) Computers in Architecture. Longman group UK Limited. United Kingdom.
3. Brown A G P and Nahab M (1996). Human Interpretation of Computer Generated Architectural Images. In: Asanawicz and Jakimowicz (ed.) CAD and Creativity. University of Bialystok, Poland.
4. Canter D (1969). An Intergroup Comparison of Connotative Dimensions in Architecture. Environment and Behaviour . 1(1), pp 37-48.
5. Hershberger R (1969). A study of meaning and architecture. PhD Thesis. University of Pennsylvania. USA.
6. Nahab M (1998). Our Response to Architectural Images. Winterschool, Sheffield University, January, 1998.
7. Osgood C E, Suci G J and Tannenbaum P H (1975). The Measurement of Meaning. (9th ed.), University of Illinois Press, USA.
8. Tweed C (1999). Learning to See Architecturally. In Paton R and Neilson I (Eds.) Visual Representations and Interpretations. Springer, Great Britain.
9. Van Bakergem W D and Obata G (1991). Free Hand Plotting-Is it Live or Is it Digital?. In: Schmitt, G.N. (Ed.), Proc. CAAD Futures 91, Zurich 1991.