Predictors of Student Withdrawal from a Self-Paced Degree Program

Journal of Public Affairs Education

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 233-243

  Carnevale, David G ^a   Mareschal, Patrice M ^b   Rudin, Joel P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ROWAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85067660084     PISSN: 15236803     EISSN: 23289643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2000.12023481     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aldrich, J. H., and F. D., Nelson. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Baron, R.A., and J. H., Neuman. 1998. “Workplace Aggression-The Iceberg Beneath the Tip of Workplace Violence: Evidence of its Forms, Frequency, and Targets. Public Administration Quarterly 21: 446–464.
3. Bobic, M., E., Davis, and R., Cunningham. 1999. “The Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 19(2): 18–31.
4. Brothen, T., 1996. Comparison of Non-Performers and High Performers in a Computer-Assisted Mastery Learning Course for Developmental Students. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education 13: 69–74.
5. Carson, K.D., P.P., Carson, C. W., Roe, B.J., Birkenmeier, and J. S., Phillips. 1999. “Four Commitment Profiles and Their Relationships to Empowerment, Service Recovery, and Work Attitudes. Public Personnel Management 28: 1–13.
6. Cohen, S.,W., Eimicke, M., Kamlet, and R., Pearson. 1998. The Information Resource Management Program: A Case Study in Distance Education. Journal of Public Affairs Education 4(3): 179–192.
7. Connick, G. P, 1997. “Issues and Trends to Take Us into the Twenty-first Century. In T. E., Cyrs, ed., Teaching and Leaning at a Distance: What It Takes to Effectively Design, Deliver, and Evaluate Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Cyrs, T. E., 1997. “Competence in Teaching at a Distance. In T. E., Cyrs, ed., Teaching and Leaning at a Distance: What It Takes to Effectively Design, Deliver, and Evaluate Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Duxbury, L., C., Higgins, and C., Lee. 1994. “Work-Family Conflicts Comparison by Gender, Family Type, and Perceived Control.” Journal of Family Issues 15: 449–466.
10. Ehrlich, E., 1989. “The Mommy Track: Juggling Kids and Careers in Corporate America Takes A Controversial Turn.” Business Week 4096: 126–134.
11. Friedman, D. E., 1988. “Why the Glass Ceiling?” Across the Board. July-August: 33–37.
12. Glaser, M A., and W B., Hildreth. 1999. “Service Delivery Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay Taxes: Citizen Recognition of Local Government Performance” Public Productivity and Management Review 23: 48–67.
13. Grabmeier J., 1995. “The Burden Women Bear: Why They Suffer More Distress Than Men.” USA Today 124(2602): 72–75.
14. Hochschild, A., with Anne, Machung. 1990. The Second Shift. New York: Avon Books.
15. Hochschild, A., 1997. The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
16. Jones, T., and E., Schieman. 1995. “Learner Involvement: A Review of the Elements of More Effective Distance Education. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication 24(2): 97–104.
17. Kelly, R.M., 1991. The Gendered Economy-Work, Careers, and Success. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage Publications
18. Kim, J. O., and Mueller, C. W., 1978. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Lange, J. E., and R.J., Fundis. 1994. “Characteristics of Successful Learning Center Students.” Hillsboro, MO: Jefferson College.
20. Lemire, L., T., Saba, and Y., Gagnon. 1999. “Managing Career Plateauing in the Quebec Public Sector. Public Personnel Management 28: 375–391.
21. Mackin, J., 1995. “Women, Stress, and Midlife.” Human Ecology Forum 23(4): 20–23.
22. Palmer, I., 1998. “Arts Managers and Managerialism: A Cross-Sector Analysis of CEOs' Orientations and Skills.” Public Productivity and Management Review 21: 433–452.
23. Reeves, T. C., 1993. “Pseudoscience in Instructional Technology: The Case of Learner Control Research.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.