Lotus Notes and collaboration: Le plus ccedil/a change

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue , 1996, Pages 61-71

  Vandenbosch, B ^a   Ginzberg, M J ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSURANCE;

COLLABORATIVE WORK; DEGREE OF COLLABORATION; INSURANCE COMPANIES;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 85067648783     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.1996.493177     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. B'mard. C. I. 1938. The Functions of the Executive, Cambridge, MA: Hxvvard University Press.
2. Bjom-Andersen. N. , K. Eason &, D. Rohey. 1986. Managing Computer Impact: An International Study of Management and Organizations, Norwood. NJ: Ablex Puhlishing Corporation.
3. Davis. F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user accept, mce of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 3 19-339.
4. Delone, W. & E. McLean. 1992. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3 (1): 60-95.
5. Dennis. A. R. , J. F. Nun;unaker, Jr. &, D. R. Vogel, 1990. A Comparison of Laborrttory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (3). 107-135.
6. Ginzberg, M. J. 1981. Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Impleinenuttion Process. MIS Quarterly 5 (2): 47-59.
7. Grohowski. R. , C. McGoff, D. Vogel, B. Mrutz & J. Nunamker. 1990. Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors. MIS Quarterly 14 (4): 368-383.
8. Hiltz. S. R. lk M. Turoff. 1993. The Network Nation: Human Communciation via Computer. Canbridge, MA: The MIT Press.
9. Hiltz, S. R. & M. Turoff. 1985. Structuring Computer-mediated Conununication Systems to Avoid Information Overload. Communications of the ACM, 28(7): 680-689.
10. Holtharn, C. 1994. Groupware: Its Past and Future. Ln P. Lloyed (ed. ) Groupware in the 21st Century, Westport. CT: Praeger, 3-14.
11. Ives, B. . M. Olson, & J. Baroudi. 1983. The ineasurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM 26 (10): 1103-1201.
12. Joh'ansen, R. 1988. Groupware. New York, NY: The Free Press.
13. Keen, P. G. 1981. MIS Research Reference disciplines and a cuinulative tradition. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, 9-18.
14. Kiely, T. 1093. Learning to Share. CIO 6 (IS): 38-44.
15. Kraemer. K. & J. King. 1988. Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making. ACM Computing Surveys, 20 (2): 115-146.
16. Lawrence. P. R. &, D. Dyer. 1983. Renewing American Industry, New York: The Free Press.
17. Lucas. H. C. , Jr. , M. J. Ginzberg &, R. L. Schultz. 1990. Information Systems Implementation: Testing a Structural Model, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
18. McLeod. P. L. 8r J. K. Liker. 1992. Electronic Meeting Systems: Evidence from a Low Structure Environment. Information Systems Research 3 (3): 195-223.
19. Mason, R. M. & H. A. Nelson. 1993. Strategic System Implementation: Some Empirical Observations, CMOST Working Paper #93-01, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Westem Reserve University
20. Moch, M. . J. Feather & D. Fitzbiggons. 1983. Conceptualizing and Measuring the relational structure in organizations. In S. Seashore, E. Lawler 111. P. Mirvis & C. C"unann (ed. ) Assessing Organizational Change: A guide to Methods, Measures, and Practices. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
21. Mrirciniak. R. 1992. Effectiveness mecsures for software development interests: Design and validations. American Association of Cost Engineers Transactions 2: 1. 6. 1-1. 6. 9.
22. Nun:un:Lker. J. F. , A. R. Dennis, J. S. Valacich, D. R. Vogel & J. F. George. 199 1. Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work. Communications of the ACM 34 (7): 40-61.
23. Orlikowski W 1992, Leaning from NOTES: Organizational Issues in Groupware hnplemenration, Proceedings of the ACM Copnference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. October 3 I-November 4, Toronto. Canada, 362-369
24. Pickering, W. 1994. Cnn Suites fill groupware needs'! Datamation 40 (1): 27-28.
25. Reed. R. 1991. Bimodality in diversification: An efficiency 'and effectiveness rationale. Managerial & Decision Economics 12 (1): 57-66.
26. Schlack, M. 1991. IS puts Notes to the test. Datamation 37 (15): 34-26.
27. Srinivasm. A. 1985. Altemative measures of systems effectiveness: Associations , and implications. MIS Quarterly 9 (3): 243-253.
28. Steers. R. M. 1975. Problems in the measurement of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 546-558.
29. Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Tyre, M. & W. Orlikowski. 1994. Windows of Oppportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations. ( Irganization Science, S(1): 98-118.
31. Vandenbosch. B. 1993. Executive support systems impact viewed from a le'ming perspective. Unpublished Doctoral Dissemtion, University of Westem Ontario.
32. Van de Ven. A. . A. Delbecq & R. Koenig. 1976. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 41: 322-338.
33. Venkatrcmcm, N. & V. Ratnanujm. 1987. Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of Management 13 (1): 109-122.
34. Willi4ms, L. J. & S. E. Anderson. 1991. Job satisfaction 'and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management 17 (3): 601-617p.
35. Weisband. S. , S. Schneider & T. Connolly. 1995. Computer-Mediated Communication and Social Information: Staus Salience , and Status Differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (4): 1124-1151.