Applications of a Counterflow Drag Reduction technique in high speed systems

19th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages

  Josyula, Eswar ^a   Pinney, Mark ^a   Blake, William B ^a  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; AUTOMOBILE BODIES; CLOCK AND DATA RECOVERY CIRCUITS (CDR CIRCUITS); DRAG REDUCTION; FUELS; HYPERSONIC VEHICLES; ROCKETS; UPPER ATMOSPHERE; VEHICLE PERFORMANCE;

EXPLORATORY STUDIES; FUEL FRACTION; HIGH SPEED SYSTEMS; INTERNAL VOLUME; PERFORMANCE GAIN; PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS; REDUCTION TECHNIQUES; SPACE OPERATIONS VEHICLES;

AERODYNAMIC DRAG;

EID: 85067322242     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-2437     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Finley, P., The flow of a jet from a body opposing supersonic free stream, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1966, pp. 337-370.
2. Bogdonoff, S., Preliminary investigations of spiked bodies at Hypersonic speeds, Journal of Aeronautical Science, Vol. 26, 1959, pp. 65-74.
3. Ganiev, Y. C, Gordeev, V., Kraslinikov, A., Lagutin, V., Otmenikov, V., and Panasenko, A., Theoretical and experimental study of the possibility of reducing aerodynamic drag by employing plasma injection, AIAA Paper 99-0603, January 1999.
4. Cain, T. and Boyd, D., Electrodynamics and the effect of an electric discharge on cone/cylinder drag at Mach 5, AIAA Paper 99-0602, January 1999.
5. Shang, J., Hayes, J., and Wurtzler, K., Jet-spike bifurcation in high-speed flows, AIAA Paper 2000-2325, June 2000.
6. Hutt, G., Forward facing spike effects on bodies of different cross section in supersonic flow, Aeronautical Journal, June/July 1989, pp. 337-370.
7. Welsh, Jr., W., Aerodynamic spike experiments on a sphere in supersonic flow, Tech. Rep. SAMSO-TR-69-163, Aerospace Corp., El Segundo California Lab Operations, El Segundo, CA, 1969.
8. Reding, J., Guenther, R., and Richter, B., Unsteady aerodynamic considerations in the design of a drag-reduction spike, Journal of Spacecrafts and Rockets, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1977, pp. 54-60.
9. Mehta, R., Fluid dynamics of self-sustained oscillatory flow over spiked blunt-body at Mach 6.80, AIAA Paper 2000-2225, June 2000.
10. Toro, P., Nagamatsu, H., Minucci, M., and Myrabo, L., Experimental pressure investigation of a Directed Energy Spike inlet at Mach 10, AIAA Paper 99-2843, June 1999.
11. Seabass, R. and Argrow, B., Sonic boom minimization revisited, AIAA Paper 98-2956, June 1998.
12. Tam, T., Ruffin, S., Gage, P., Bogdanoff, D., Yates, L., and Morgenstern, J., Sonic boom testing of artificially blunted leading edge (ABLE) concepts in the NASA Ames Aeroballistic Range, AIAA Paper 2000-1011, January 2000
13. Moore, F., Hymer, T., and Mclnville, R., An improved version of the naval surface warfare center aeroprediction code (AP93), Journal of Spacecrafts and Rockets, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1994, pp. 783-791.
14. Blake, W., Missile Datcom User's Manual - 1997 Fortran 90 Revision, Tech. Rep. AFRL-VA-WP-TR-1998-3007, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1998.
15. Romeo, D. and Sterrett, J., Exploratory investigation of the effect of a forward facing jet on the bow shock of a blunt body in a Mach number 6 free stream, Tech. Rep. NASA TN D-1605, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 1963.
16. Josyula, E., Computational simulation improvements of supersonic high-angle-of-attack missile flows, Journal of Spacecrafts and Rockets, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1999, pp. 59-66.
17. DeJarnette, F.R., Ford, C., and Young, D., Calculation of Pressures on Bodies at Low Angles of Attack in supersonic Flow, Journal of Spacecrafts and Rockets, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1980, pp. 529-536.
18. Finck, R., USAF (United States Air Force) Stability and Control DATCOM (Data Compendium), Tech. Rep. AFWAL-TR-83-3048 McDonnell Aircraft Company, St. Louis, MO, 1978.
19. Van Driest, E., Turbulent Boundary Layers in Compressible Fluids, Journal of Aeronautical Science, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1951, pp. 145-160.
20. Moore, F.G, Wilcox, F. and Hymer, T., Base Drag Prediction on Missile Configurations, Journal of Spacecrafts and Rockets, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1994, pp. 759-765.
21. Packard, J. and Miller, M., Assessment of Engineering-Level Codes for Missile Aerodynamic Design and Analysis, AIAA Paper 2000-4590, August 2000.
22. Strang, W., Tomaro, R, and Grismer, M., The defining methods of Cobalteo AIAA Paper 99-0786, January 1999.
23. Tomaro, R., Witzeman, F., and Strang, W., A solution on the F-18C for store separation simulation using Cobalteo, AIAA Paper 99-0122, January 1999.
24. Godunov, S., A difference scheme for numerical computation of discontinuous solution of hydrodynamic equations, Sbornik Mathematics, Vol. 17, 1959, pp. 271-306.
25. Tomaro, R., Strang, W., and Sankar, L., An implicit algorithm for solving time dependent flows on unstructured grids, AIAA Paper 97-0333, January 1997.
26. Sturek, W., Birch, T., Lauzon, M., Housh, C, Manter, J., Josyula, E., and Soni, B., The Application of CFD to the Prediction of Missile Body Vortcies, AIAA Paper 97-0637, 1997.
27. Spalart, P. and Alunaras, S., A one dimensional turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, AIAA Paper 92-0439, January 1992.