Partisanship Reconsidered

The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Holmberg, Sören ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Empirical measurement; Funnel of causality; Location of party identification; Partisanship; Party identification; Theoretical definition; Unmoved mover

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066726676     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0029     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. ABRAMOWITZ, A., and SAUNDERS, K. 2004. Rational hearts and minds: social identity, ideology, and party identification in the American electorate. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 2004.
2. BÄCK, H., and TEORELL, J. 2005. Party attachemnt and political participation: a panel study of citizen attitudes and behavior in Russia. Paper presented at a Studying Political Action meeting at Karlstad University, June 2005.
3. BELKNAP, G., and CAMPBELL, A. 1952. Political party identification and attitudes toward foreign policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15: 601-23.
4. BERGLUND, F. 2004. Partiidentifikasjon og politisk endring: En studie av langsiktige tillknytninger blant norske velgere 1965-1997. Oslo: Thesis/Unipax.
5. BERGLUND, F., HOLMBERG, S., SCHMITT, H., and THOMASSEN, J. 2005. Party identification and party choice. Pp. 106-24 in The European Voter, ed. J. Thomassen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. BORRE, O., and Goul Andersen, J. 1997. Voting and Political Attitudes in Denmark. Aarhus University Press.
7. BRADER, T., and TUCKER, J. 2001a. Pathways to partisanship in new democracies: evidence from Russia. Paper presented at an AAASS meeting in Washington, DC, November 2001.
8. BRADER, T., and TUCKER, J. 2001b. The Emergence of Mass Partisanship in Russia, 1993-1996. American Journal of Political Science, 45 (1): 69-83.
9. BREWER, M., and SILVER, M. 2000. Group distinctiveness, social identity and collective mobilization. Pp. 153-71 in Self, Identity and Social Movement, ed. S. Stryker, T. Owens, and R. White. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
10. BUDGE, I., CREWE, I., and FARLIE, D. 1976. Party Identification and Beyond. London: John Wiley & Sons.
11. CAMPBELL, A., and VALEN, H. 1961. Party identification in Norway and the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25: 245-68.
12. CAMPBELL, A., CONVERSE, P., MILLER, W., and STOKES, D. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
13. DALTON, R. 1984. Cognitive mobilization and partisan dealignment in advanced industrial societies. Journal of Politics, 46: 264-84.
14. DALTON, R. and WATTENBERG, M. 2000. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. DALTON, R. and WELDON, S. 2005. Partisanship and party system institutionalization. Paper presented at National Democratic Institute, Washington, DC, August 2005.
16. DOWNS, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
17. DREYER, E. 1973. Change and stability in party identification. American Journal of Political Science, 35: 712-22.
18. ERIKSON, R., MACKUEN, M., and STIMSON, J. 2001. Macropartisanship: the permanent memory of partisanship evaluation. Pp. 364-70 in Controversies in Voting Behavior, ed. R. Niemi and H. Weisberg. Washington DC: CQ Press.
19. FINKEL, S., and Opp, K-D. 1991. Party identification and participation in collective political action. Journal of Politics, 53: 339-71.
20. FIORINA, M. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American Presidential Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
21. GILLJAM, M. 2003. Kommentarer till Frode Berglunds avhandling. Göteborg: Department of Political Science.
22. GOLDBERG, A. 1969. Social determination and rationality as a basis of party identification. American Political Science Review, 63: 5-25.
23. GREEN, D., PALMQUIST, B., and SCHICKLER, E. 2001. Partisan stability: evidence from aggregate data. Pp. 356-63 in Controversies in Voting Behavior, ed. R. Niemi and H. Weisberg. Washington DC: CQ Press.
24. GREEN, D., PALMQUIST, B., and SCHICKLER, E. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
25. GREENE, S. 2004. Social Identity Theory and Party Identification. Social Science Quarterly, 85: 136-53.
26. GREENSTEIN, F. 1965. Children and Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
27. HAGOPIAN, F. 1998. Democracy and political representation in Latin America in the 1990s: pause, reorganization, or decline? In Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America, ed. F. Agüero and J. Stark. Coral Gabels: North/South Center Press, University of Miami.
28. Hetherington, Mark. 2001. Resurgent mass partisanship: the role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95 (3): 619-32.
29. HOLMBERG, S. 1994. Party identification compared across the Atlantic. Pp. 93-121 in Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren E. Miller, ed. K. Jennings and T. Mann. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
30. HOLMBERG, S. and OSCARSSON, H. 2004. Väljare: Svenskt väljarbeteende under 50 år. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
31. JACKSON, J. 1975. Issues, party choice, and presidential votes. American Journal of Political Science, 19: 161-85.
32. JENNINGS, K., and NIEMI, R. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and their Parents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33. KEY, V. O. 1955. A Theory of Critical Elections. Journal of Politics, 17: 3-18.
34. LeDuc, L. 1981. The dynamic properties of party identification: a four-nation comparison. European Journal of Political Research, 9: 257-68.
35. LISTHAUG, O. 1989. Citizens, Parties and Norwegian Electoral Politics 1957-1986: An Empirical Study. Trondheim: Tapir.
36. MACKUEN, M., ERIKSON, R., and STIMSON, J. 1989. Macropartisanship. American Political Science Review, 83: 1125-42.
37. MARKUS, G., and CONVERSE, P. 1979. A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73: 1055-70.
38. MEFFERT, M., NORPOTH, H., and RUHIL, A. 2001. Realignment and macropartisanship. American Political Science Review, 95: 953-62.
39. MILLER, A., and KLOBUCAR, T. 2000. The development of party identification in post-Soviet societies. American Journal of Political Science, 44: 667-86.
40. MILLER, W. 1991. Party identification, realignment, and party voting: back to the basics. American Political Science Review, 85: 557-68.
41. MILLER, W. 1992. Generational change and party identification. Political Behavior, 14: 333-53.
42. MILLER, W. and SHANKS, M. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
43. NIEMI, R., and WEISBERG, H. eds. 2001. Controversies in Voting Behavior. Washington DC: CQ Press.
44. PAGE, B., and JONES, C. 1979. Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote. American Political Science Review, 83: 1071-89.
45. PETROCIK, J. R. 1974. An analysis of intransitivities in the index of party identification. Political Methodology, 1: 38-48.
46. RAHN, W. 1993. The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37: 472-96.
47. ROBERTSON, D. 1976. Surrogates for party identification in the rational choice framework. Pp. 365-81 in Party Identification and Beyond, ed. I. Budge, I. Crewe, and B. Farlie. London: John Wiley & Sons.
48. ROSENHOF, T. 2003. Realignment: The Theory that Changed the Way We Think about American Politics. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.
49. SANCHEZ, F. 2003. Dealignment in Costa Rica: a case study of electoral change. St Anthony's College, University of Oxford.
50. Särlvik, B. 1970. Electoral Behavior in the Swedish Multiparty System. Göteborg: Department of Political Science.
51. SCHMITT, H. forthcoming. Multiple party identifications. In The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, ed. H. Klingemann.
52. SCHMITT, H. and HOLMBERG, S. 1995. Political parties in decline? Pp. 95-134 in Citizens and the State, ed. H.-D. Klingemann and D. Fuchs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. SHIVELY, P. 1979. The development of party identification among adults: explanation of functional model. American Political Science Review, 73: 1039-54.
54. SHIVELY, P. 1980. The nature of party identification: a review of recent developments. In The Electorate Reconsidered, ed. J. Pierce and J. Sullivan. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
55. SNIDERMAN, P., BRODY, R., and TETLOCK, P. 1991. Reasoning and Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. TAJFEL, H. 1978. Social categorization, social identity, and social comparisons. Pp. 61-76 in Differentiation between Social Groups, ed. H. Tajfel. London: Academic Press.
57. THOMASSEN, J. 1976. Party identification as a cross-national concept: its meaning in the Netherlands. Pp. 63-79 in Party Identification and Beyond, ed. I.Budge, I. Crewe, and D. Farlie. London: John Wiley & Sons.
58. VISSER, M. 1992. The role of group indentifications in dutch politics. Paper presented at the ECPR Workshop in Limerick 1992.
59. WATTENBERG, M. 1998. The Decline of American Political Parties 1952-1988. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
60. WEISBERG, H. 1980. A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior, 2: 33-60.
61. WHITE, S., ROSE, R., and McAllister, I. 1997. How Russia Votes. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.