High-throughput field-phenotyping tools for plant breeding and precision agriculture

Agronomy

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2019, Pages

  Chawade, Aakash ^a   Van Ham, Joost ^b   Blomquist, Hanna ^c   Bagge, Oscar ^c   Alexandersson, Erik ^a   Ortiz, Rodomiro ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c IBM   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Decision support systems; Field phenotyping; Precision agriculture; Precision breeding

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066450619     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy9050258     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Hunter, M.C.; Smith, R.G.; Schipanski, M.E.; Atwood, L.W.; Mortensen, D.A. Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating Targets for Sustainable Intensification. Bioscience 2017, 67, 386-391. [CrossRef]
2. Altieri, M.A.; Nicholls, C.I. The adaptation and mitigation potential of traditional agriculture in a changing climate. Clim. Chang. 2013, 140, 33-45. [CrossRef]
3. Chawade, A.; Armoniene, R.; Berg, G.; Brazauskas, G.; Frostgard, G.; Geleta, M.; Gorash, A.; Henriksson, T.; Himanen, K.; Ingver, A.; et al. A transnational and holistic breeding approach is needed for sustainable wheat production in the Baltic Sea region. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 164, 442-451. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Collard, B.C.Y.; Mackill, D.J. Marker-assisted selection: An approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Boil. Sci. 2008, 363, 557-572. [CrossRef]
5. Ghaffary, S.M.T.; Chawade, A.; Singh, P.K. Practical breeding strategies to improve resistance to Septoria tritici blotch of wheat. Euphytica 2018, 214, 122. [CrossRef]
6. Bazakos, C.; Hanemian, M.; Trontin, C.; Jiménez-Gómez, J.M.; Loudet, O. New Strategies and Tools in Quantitative Genetics: How to Go from the Phenotype to the Genotype. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017, 68, 435-455. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Desta, Z.A.; Ortiz, R. Genomic selection: Genome-wide prediction in plant improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 592-601. [CrossRef]
8. Martin, L.B.B.; Fei, Z.; Giovannoni, J.J.; Rose, J.K.C. Catalyzing plant science research with RNA-seq. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 66. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Meijón, M.; Satbhai, S.B.; Tsuchimatsu, T.; Busch, W. Genome-wide association study using cellular traits identifies a new regulator of root development in Arabidopsis. Nat. Genet. 2013, 46, 77-81. [CrossRef]
10. Chawade, A.; Alexandersson, E.; Bengtsson, T.; Andreasson, E.; Levander, F. Targeted proteomics approach for precision plant breeding. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 638-646. [CrossRef]
11. Acharjee, A.; Chibon, P.-Y.; Kloosterman, B.; America, T.; Renaut, J.; Maliepaard, C.; Visser, R.G.F. Genetical genomics of quality related traits in potato tubers using proteomics. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 20. [CrossRef]
12. Alexandersson, E.; Jacobson, D.; Vivier, M.;Weckwerth, W.; Andreasson, E. Field-omics - Understanding large-scale molecular data from field crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 286. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Mahlein, A.K. Plant Disease Detection by Imaging Sensors - Parallels and Specific Demands for Precision Agriculture and Plant Phenotyping. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 241-251. [CrossRef]
14. Minervini, M.; Scharr, H.; Tsaftaris, S.A. Image Analysis: The New Bottleneck in Plant Phenotyping [Applications Corner]. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2015, 32, 126-131. [CrossRef]
15. Reynolds, D.; Baret, F.; Welcker, C.; Bostrom, A.; Ball, J.; Cellini, F.; Lorence, A.; Chawade, A.; Khafif, M.; Noshita, K.; et al. What is cost-efficient phenotyping? Optimizing costs for different scenarios. Plant Sci. 2019, 282, 14-22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Pretty, J.N. The sustainable intensification of agriculture. Nat. Resour. Forum 1997, 21, 247-256. [CrossRef]
17. Elmgren, R.; Larsson, U. Nitrogen and the Baltic Sea: Managing nitrogen in relation to phosphorus. Sci.World J. 2001, 1, 371-377. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Heick, T.M.; Justesen, A.F.; Jørgensen, L.N. Resistance of wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici to DMI and QoI fungicides in the Nordic-Baltic region - A status. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 149, 669-682. [CrossRef]
19. Kempenaar, C.; Been, T.; Booij, J.; van Evert, F.; Michielsen, J.-M.; Kocks, C. Advances in Variable Rate Technology Application in Potato in The Netherlands. Potato Res. 2018, 60, 295-305. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. Mahlein, A.K.; Steiner, U.; Dehne, H.W.; Oerke, E.C. Spectral signatures of sugar beet leaves for the detection and differentiation of diseases. Precis. Agric. 2010, 11, 413-431. [CrossRef]
21. Araus, J.L.; Kefauver, S.C.; Zaman-Allah, M.; Olsen, M.S.; Cairns, J.E. Translating High-Throughput Phenotyping into Genetic Gain. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 451-466. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Rutkoski, J.; Poland, J.; Mondal, S.; Autrique, E.; Pérez, L.G.; Crossa, J.; Reynolds, M.; Singh, R. Canopy Temperature and Vegetation Indices from High-Throughput Phenotyping Improve Accuracy of Pedigree and Genomic Selection for Grain Yield in Wheat. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2016, 6, 2799-2808. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Tattaris, M.; Reynolds, M.P.; Chapman, S.C. A Direct Comparison of Remote Sensing Approaches for High-Throughput Phenotyping in Plant Breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1131. [CrossRef]
24. Yang, C. High resolution satellite imaging sensors for precision agriculture. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2018, 5, 393-405. [CrossRef]
25. Seelan, S.K.; Laguette, S.; Casady, G.M.; Seielstad, G.A. Remote sensing applications for precision agriculture: A learning community approach. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 88, 157-169. [CrossRef]
26. Piikki, K.; Söderström, M. Digital soil mapping of arable land in Sweden - Validation of performance at multiple scales. Geoderma 2017. [CrossRef]
27. Sankaran, S.; Khot, L.R.; Espinoza, C.Z.; Jarolmasjed, S.; Sathuvalli, V.R.; Vandemark, G.J.; Miklas, P.N.; Carter, A.H.; Pumphrey, M.O.; Knowles, N.R.; et al. Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: A review. Eur. J. Agron. 2015, 70, 112-123. [CrossRef]
28. Zaman-Allah, M.; Vergara, O.; Araus, J.L.; Tarekegne, A.; Magorokosho, C.; Zarco-Tejada, P.J.; Hornero, A.; Albà, A.H.; Das, B.; Craufurd, P.; et al. Unmanned aerial platform-based multi-spectral imaging for field phenotyping of maize. Plant Methods 2015, 11, 35. [CrossRef]
29. De Souza, C.H.W.; Lamparelli, R.A.C.; Rocha, J.V.; Magalhães, P.S.G. Height estimation of sugarcane using an unmanned aerial system (UAS) based on structure from motion (SfM) point clouds. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 38, 2218-2230. [CrossRef]
30. Lelong, C.; Burger, P.; Jubelin, G.; Roux, B.; Labbé, S.; Baret, F. Assessment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Imagery for Quantitative Monitoring of Wheat Crop in Small Plots. Sensors 2008, 8, 3557-3585. [CrossRef]
31. Xu, R.; Li, C.; Paterson, A.H.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, S.; Robertson, J.S. Aerial Images and Convolutional Neural Network for Cotton Bloom Detection. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 8, 2235. [CrossRef]
32. Ludovisi, R.; Tauro, F.; Salvati, R.; Khoury, S.; Mugnozza Scarascia, G.; Harfouche, A. UAV-Based Thermal Imaging for High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Black Poplar Response to Drought. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1681. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Khan, Z.; Rahimi-Eichi, V.; Haefele, S.; Garnett, T.; Miklavcic, S.J. Estimation of vegetation indices for high-throughput phenotyping of wheat using aerial imaging. Plant Methods 2018, 14, 20. [CrossRef]
34. Gnädinger, F.; Schmidhalter, U. Digital Counts of Maize Plants by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 544. [CrossRef]
35. Madec, S.; Baret, F.; de Solan, B.; Thomas, S.; Dutartre, D.; Jezequel, S.; Hemmerlé, M.; Colombeau, G.; Comar, A. High-Throughput Phenotyping of Plant Height: Comparing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Ground LiDAR Estimates. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2002. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Geipel, J.; Link, J.; Claupein, W. Combined Spectral and Spatial Modeling of Corn Yield Based on Aerial Images and Crop Surface Models Acquired with an Unmanned Aircraft System. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 10335-10355. [CrossRef]
37. Bendig, J.; Yu, K.; Aasen, H.; Bolten, A.; Bennertz, S.; Broscheit, J.; Gnyp, M.L.; Bareth, G. Combining UAV-based plant height from crop surface models, visible, and near infrared vegetation indices for biomass monitoring in barley. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinform. 2015, 39, 79-87. [CrossRef]
38. Chapman, S.; Merz, T.; Chan, A.; Jackway, P.; Hrabar, S.; Dreccer, M.; Holland, E.; Zheng, B.; Ling, T.; Jimenez-Berni, J. Pheno-Copter: A Low-Altitude, Autonomous Remote-Sensing Robotic Helicopter for High-Throughput Field-Based Phenotyping. Agronomy 2014, 4, 279-301. [CrossRef]
39. Deery, D.; Jimenez-Berni, J.; Jones, H.; Sirault, X.; Furbank, R. Proximal Remote Sensing Buggies and Potential Applications for Field-Based Phenotyping. Agronomy 2014, 4, 349-379. [CrossRef]
40. Keener, M.E.; Kircher, P.L. The use of canopy temperature as an indicator of drought stress in humid regions. Agric. Meteorol. 1983, 28, 339-349. [CrossRef]
41. Koc, A.; Henriksson, T.; Chawade, A. Specalyzer - An interactive online tool to analyze spectral reflectance measurements. PeerJ 2018, 6, e5031. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Garriga, M.; Romero-Bravo, S.; Estrada, F.; Escobar, A.; Matus, I.A.; del Pozo, A.; Astudillo, C.A.; Lobos, G.A. Assessing Wheat Traits by Spectral Reflectance: DoWe Really Need to Focus on Predicted Trait-Values or Directly Identify the Elite Genotypes Group? Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 280. [CrossRef]
43. Huang, W.; Lamb, D.W.; Niu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, J. Identification of yellow rust in wheat using in-situ spectral reflectance measurements and airborne hyperspectral imaging. Precis. Agric. 2007, 8, 187-197. [CrossRef]
44. Odilbekov, F.; Armoniene, R.; Henriksson, T.; Chawade, A. Proximal Phenotyping and Machine Learning Methods to Identify Septoria Tritici Blotch Disease Symptoms in Wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 685. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Debaeke, P.; Rouet, P.; Justes, E. Relationship Between the Normalized SPAD Index and the Nitrogen Nutrition Index: Application to Durum Wheat. J. Plant Nutr. 2006, 29, 75-92. [CrossRef]
46. Yang, H.; Yang, J.; Lv, Y.; He, J. SPAD Values and Nitrogen Nutrition Index for the Evaluation of Rice Nitrogen Status. Plant Prod. Sci. 2015, 17, 81-92. [CrossRef]
47. Andrianto, H.; Suhardi; Faizal, A. Measurement of chlorophyll content to determine nutrition deficiency in plants: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI), Bandung, Indonesia, 23-24 October 2017; pp. 392-397.
48. Chawade, A.; Linden, P.; Brautigam, M.; Jonsson, R.; Jonsson, A.; Moritz, T.; Olsson, O. Development of a model system to identify differences in spring and winter oat. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29792. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Crain, J.L.; Wei, Y.; Barker, J.; Thompson, S.M.; Alderman, P.D.; Reynolds, M.; Zhang, N.; Poland, J. Development and Deployment of a Portable Field Phenotyping Platform. Crop Sci. 2016, 56, 965-975. [CrossRef]
50. White, J.W.; Conley, M.M. A Flexible, Low-Cost Cart for Proximal Sensing. Crop Sci. 2013, 53, 1646-1649. [CrossRef]
51. Thompson, A.L.; Thorp, K.R.; Conley, M.; Andrade-Sanchez, P.; Heun, J.T.; Dyer, J.M.; White, J.W. Deploying a Proximal Sensing Cart to Identify Drought-Adaptive Traits in Upland Cotton for High-Throughput Phenotyping. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 507. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Bai, G.; Ge, Y.; Hussain, W.; Baenziger, P.S.; Graef, G. A multi-sensor system for high throughput field phenotyping in soybean and wheat breeding. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016, 128, 181-192. [CrossRef]
53. Barmeier, G.; Schmidhalter, U. High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Leaves, Leaf Sheaths, Culms and Ears of Spring Barley Cultivars at Anthesis and Dough Ripeness. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1920. [CrossRef]
54. Rischbeck, P.; Elsayed, S.; Mistele, B.; Barmeier, G.; Heil, K.; Schmidhalter, U. Data fusion of spectral, thermal and canopy height parameters for improved yield prediction of drought stressed spring barley. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 78, 44-59. [CrossRef]
55. Barmeier, G.; Schmidhalter, U. High-Throughput Phenotyping of Wheat and Barley Plants Grown in Single or Few Rows in Small Plots Using Active and Passive Spectral Proximal Sensing. Sensors 2016, 16, 1860. [CrossRef]
56. Andrade-Sanchez, P.; Gore, M.A.; Heun, J.T.; Thorp, K.R.; Carmo-Silva, A.E.; French, A.N.; Salvucci, M.E.; White, J.W. Development and evaluation of a field-based high-throughput phenotyping platform. Funct. Plant Biol. 2014, 41, 68-79. [CrossRef]
57. Sun, S.; Li, C.; Paterson, A.H.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, R.; Robertson, J.S.; Snider, J.L.; Chee, P.W. In-field High Throughput Phenotyping and Cotton Plant Growth Analysis Using LiDAR. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58. Jiang, Y.; Li, C.; Robertson, J.S.; Sun, S.; Xu, R.; Paterson, A.H. Gphenovision: A Ground Mobile System with Multi-modal Imaging for Field-Based High Throughput Phenotyping of Cotton. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1213. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
59. Kirchgessner, N.; Liebisch, F.; Yu, K.; Pfeifer, J.; Friedli, M.; Hund, A.; Walter, A. The ETH field phenotyping platform FIP: A cable-suspended multi-sensor system. Funct. Plant Boil. 2017, 44, 154-168. [CrossRef]
60. Xu, Y.; Li, P.; Zou, C.; Lu, Y.; Xie, C.; Zhang, X.; Prasanna, B.M.; Olsen, M.S. Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2641-2666. [CrossRef]
61. Hatfield, J.L.;Walthall, C.L. Meeting Global Food Needs: Realizing the Potential via Genetics × Environment × Management Interactions. Agron. J. 2015, 107, 1215-1226. [CrossRef]
62. Hunt, E.R.; Daughtry, C.S.T. What good are unmanned aircraft systems for agricultural remote sensing and precision agriculture? Int. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 39, 5345-5376. [CrossRef]
63. Crain, J.; Mondal, S.; Rutkoski, J.; Singh, R.P.; Poland, J. Combining High-Throughput Phenotyping and Genomic Information to Increase Prediction and Selection Accuracy in Wheat Breeding. Plant Genome 2018, 11. [CrossRef]
64. Juliana, P.; Montesinos-López, O.A.; Crossa, J.; Mondal, S.; González Pérez, L.; Poland, J.; Huerta-Espino, J.; Crespo-Herrera, L.; Govindan, V.; Dreisigacker, S.; et al. Integrating genomic-enabled prediction and high-throughput phenotyping in breeding for climate-resilient bread wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 132, 177-194. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Brown, T.B.; Cheng, R.; Sirault, X.R.R.; Rungrat, T.; Murray, K.D.; Trtilek, M.; Furbank, R.T.; Badger, M.; Pogson, B.J.; Borevitz, J.O. TraitCapture: Genomic and environment modelling of plant phenomic data. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 18, 73-79. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
66. Singh, A.; Ganapathysubramanian, B.; Singh, A.K.; Sarkar, S. Machine Learning for High-Throughput Stress Phenotyping in Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 110-124. [CrossRef]
67. Shakoor, N.; Lee, S.; Mockler, T.C. High throughput phenotyping to accelerate crop breeding and monitoring of diseases in the field. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 38, 184-192. [CrossRef]
68. Joalland, S.; Screpanti, C.; Liebisch, F.; Varella, H.V.; Gaume, A.;Walter, A. Comparison of visible imaging, thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the Effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets. Plant Methods 2017, 13, 73. [CrossRef]
69. Joalland, S.; Screpanti, C.; Varella, H.; Reuther, M.; Schwind, M.; Lang, C.; Walter, A.; Liebisch, F. Aerial and Ground Based Sensing of Tolerance to Beet Cyst Nematode in Sugar Beet. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 787. [CrossRef]
70. Kuska, M.T.; Mahlein, A.K. Aiming at decision making in plant disease protection and phenotyping by the use of optical sensors. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 152, 987-992. [CrossRef]
71. Wu, D.; Ma, C. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) Based Near-Infrared Spectrum Recognition of Leaves Infected by the Leafminers. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control, Volume I (ICICIC'06), Beijing, China, 30 August-1 September 2006; pp. 448-451.
72. Mohanty, S.P.; Hughes, D.P.; Salathé, M. Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1419. [CrossRef]
73. Sa, I.; Popović, M.; Khanna, R.; Chen, Z.; Lottes, P.; Liebisch, F.; Nieto, J.; Stachniss, C.;Walter, A.; Siegwart, R. WeedMap: A Large-Scale Semantic Weed Mapping Framework Using Aerial Multispectral Imaging and Deep Neural Network for Precision Farming. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1423. [CrossRef]
74. Sawyer, J.E. Concepts of Variable Rate Technology with Considerations for Fertilizer Application. J. Prod. Agric. 1994, 7, 195-201. [CrossRef]
75. Reyes, J.F.; Esquivel, W.; Cifuentes, D.; Ortega, R. Field testing of an automatic control system for variable rate fertilizer application. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2015, 113, 260-265. [CrossRef]
76. Naik, H.S.; Zhang, J.; Lofquist, A.; Assefa, T.; Sarkar, S.; Ackerman, D.; Singh, A.; Singh, A.K.; Ganapathysubramanian, B. A real-time phenotyping framework using machine learning for plant stress severity rating in soybean. Plant Methods 2017, 13, 23. [CrossRef]
77. Bravo, C.; Moshou, D.;West, J.; McCartney, A.; Ramon, H. Early Disease Detection in Wheat Fields using Spectral Reflectance. Biosyst. Eng. 2003, 84, 137-145. [CrossRef]
78. Griffel, L.M.; Delparte, D.; Edwards, J. Using Support Vector Machines classification to differentiate spectral signatures of potato plants infected with Potato Virus Y. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 153, 318-324. [CrossRef]
79. Sugiura, R.; Tsuda, S.; Tamiya, S.; Itoh, A.; Nishiwaki, K.; Murakami, N.; Shibuya, Y.; Hirafuji, M.; Nuske, S. Field phenotyping system for the assessment of potato late blight resistance using RGB imagery from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Biosystems Engineering 2016, 148, 1-10. [CrossRef]
80. Franceschini, M.H.D.; Bartholomeus, H.; van Apeldoorn, D.F.; Suomalainen, J.; Kooistra, L. Feasibility of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Optical Imagery for Early Detection and Severity Assessment of Late Blight in Potato. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 224. [CrossRef]
81. Oerke, E.C.; Dehne, H.W. Safeguarding production - Losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Prot. 2004, 23, 275-285. [CrossRef]
82. Harker, K.N.; O'Donovan, J.T. Recent Weed Control, Weed Management, and Integrated Weed Management. Weed Technol. 2017, 27, 1-11. [CrossRef]
83. Gonzalez-Andujar, J.L.; Huang, H.; Deng, J.; Lan, Y.; Yang, A.; Deng, X.; Zhang, L. A fully convolutional network for weed mapping of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196302. [CrossRef]
84. Peña, J.; Torres-Sánchez, J.; Serrano-Pérez, A.; de Castro, A.; López-Granados, F. Quantifying Efficacy and Limits of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Technology forWeed Seedling Detection as affected by Sensor Resolution. Sensors 2015, 15, 5609-5626. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
85. Rose, D.C.; Sutherland, W.J.; Parker, C.; Lobley, M.;Winter, M.; Morris, C.; Twining, S.; Ffoulkes, C.; Amano, T.; Dicks, L.V. Decision support tools for agriculture: Towards Effective design and delivery. Agric. Syst. 2016, 149, 165-174. [CrossRef]
86. Johannes, A.; Picon, A.; Alvarez-Gila, A.; Echazarra, J.; Rodriguez-Vaamonde, S.; Navajas, A.D.; Ortiz-Barredo, A. Automatic plant disease diagnosis using mobile capture devices, applied on a wheat use case. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 138, 200-209. [CrossRef]
87. Ramcharan, A.; Baranowski, K.; McCloskey, P.; Ahmed, B.; Legg, J.; Hughes, D.P. Deep Learning for Image-Based Cassava Disease Detection. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1852. [CrossRef]
88. Hallau, L.; Neumann, M.; Klatt, B.; Kleinhenz, B.; Klein, T.; Kuhn, C.; Röhrig, M.; Bauckhage, C.; Kersting, K.; Mahlein, A.K.; et al. Automated identification of sugar beet diseases using smartphones. Plant Pathol. 2018, 67, 399-410. [CrossRef]
89. Devaux, A.; Kromann, P.; Ortiz, O. Potatoes for sustainable global food security. Potato Res. 2014, 57, 185-199. [CrossRef]
90. Eriksson, D.; Carlson-Nilsson, U.; Ortíz, R.; Andreasson, E. Overview and Breeding Strategies of Table Potato Production in Sweden and the Fennoscandian Region. Potato Res. 2016, 59, 279-294. [CrossRef]
91. Gijzen, M.; Lehsten, V.;Wiik, L.; Hannukkala, A.; Andreasson, E.; Chen, D.; Ou, T.; Liljeroth, E.; Lankinen, Å.; Grenville-Briggs, L. Earlier occurrence and increased explanatory power of climate for the first incidence of potato late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans in Fennoscandia. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177580. [CrossRef]
92. Fry, W.E. Evaluation of Potato Late Blight Forecasts Modified to Incorporate Host Resistance and Fungicide Weathering. Phytopathology 1983, 73, 1054-1059. [CrossRef]
93. Alexandersson, E.; Antkowiak, P.; Holmberg, M.; Piikki, K.; Söderström, M.; Liljeroth, E. The possibilities and challenges of UAV-borne remote sensing for detection of potato late blight in the field. In Abstract Book for the Plant Biology Europe Conference in Copenhagen; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2018; p. 10, ISBN 978-87-996274-1-7.
94. Brown, B. The Total Economic Impact. of IBM's Design Thinking Practice; Forrester Consulting: Massachusetts, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 1-45.
95. Ćwiek-Kupczyńska, H.; Altmann, T.; Arend, D.; Arnaud, E.; Chen, D.; Cornut, G.; Fiorani, F.; Frohmberg, W.; Junker, A.; Klukas, C.; et al. Measures for interoperability of phenotypic data: Minimum information requirements and formatting. Plant Methods 2016, 12, 44. [CrossRef] [PubMed]