Extreme pedagogies: When technical communication vaults institutional barriers

Online Education: Global Questions, Local Answers

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 301-318

  Wahlstrom, Billie J ^a   Clemens, Linda S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066222428     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781315223971-23     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. R. Johnson, User-Centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts, SUNY University Press, Albany, 1998.
2. B. Longo, Spurious Coin: A History of Science, Management, and Technical Writing, SUNY University Press, Albany, 2000.
3. L. Gurak, Cyber literacy: Navigating the Internet with Awareness, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 2001.
4. B. Faber and J. Johnson-Eilola, Migrations: Strategic Thinking about the Future(s) of Technical Communication, in Reshaping Technical Communication: New Directions and Challenges for the 21st Century, B. Mirel and R. Spilka (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 135-148, 2002.
5. D. Norton, The Strategic Technical Communicator: A Critical Action Inquiry of Information Architecture, unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota, 2001.
6. B. Mirel and R. Spilka (eds.), Reshaping Technical Communication: New Directions and Challenges for the 21st Century, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 2002.
7. D. E. Hanna and Associates, Higher Education in an Era of Digital Competition: Choices and Challenges, Atwood Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, 2000.
8. D. A. Dillman, J. A. Christenson, P. Salant, and P. W. Warner, What the Public Wants from Higher Education: Workforce Implications for a 1995 National Survey, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 1995.
9. S. Charp, Changes to Traditional Teaching, T.H.E. Journal, 29:10, pp. 10, 12, 2002.
10. F. Olsen, Phoenix Rises: The University’s Online Program Attracts Students, Profits, and Praise, Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A29, November 1, 2002.
11. E. Tebeaux, Technical Writing by Distance: Refocusing the Pedagogy of Technical Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 4, pp. 365-393, 1995.
12. L. A. Jorn, A. H. Duin, and B. J. Wahlstrom, Designing and Managing Virtual Learning Communities, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 39, pp. 183-191, 1996.
13. A. H. Duin and R. Archee, Distance Learning Via the World Wide Web: Information, Engagement, and Community, in Computers and Technical Communication: Pedagogical and Programmatic Perspectives, S. A. Selber (ed.), Ablex, Greenwich, Connecticut, pp. 149-169, 1997.
14. S. P. Schneider and C. G. Germann, Technical Communication on the Web: A Profile of Learners and Learning Environments, Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, pp. 37-48, 1999.
15. E. A. Thrush and N. E. Young, Hither, Thither, and Yon: Process in Putting Courses on the Web, Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, pp. 49-59, 1999.
16. D. Gilette, Pedagogy, Architecture, and the Virtual Classroom, Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, pp. 21-36, 1999.
17. M. F. O’Sullivan, Worlds Within Which We Teach: Issues for Designing World Wide Web Course Material, Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, pp. 61-72, 1999.
18. S. J. Racine and D. Dilworth, Using Interactive Television to Teach Professional Communicators, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14, pp. 348-371, 2000.
19. A. H. Duin, The Culture of Distance Education: Implementing an Online Graduate Level Course in Audience Analysis, Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, pp. 365-388, 1998.
20. C. A. Twigg, Innovations in Online Learning: Moving Beyond No Significant Difference, The Pew Learning and Technology Program, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2001.
21. M. G. Moore and G. Kearsley, Distance Education: A Systems View, Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 1996.
22. D. V. Eastmond, Adult Learners and Internet-Based Distance Education, in Adult Learning and the Internet, B. Cahoon (ed.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 33-41, 1998.
23. C. Dede, Emerging Technologies and Distributed Learning, 1996. http://www.virtual.gmu.edu/SS__research/cdpapers/ajdepdf.htm, May 28, 2002.
24. L. Harasim, S. R. Hiltz, L. Teles, and M. Turoff, Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995.
25. E. D. Wagner, Interactivity: From Agents to Outcomes, in Teaching and Learning at a Distance: What It Takes to Effectively Design, Deliver, and Evaluate Programs, T. E. Cyrs (ed.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 19-26, 1997.
26. L. R. Porter, Creating the Virtual Classroom: Distance Learning with the Internet, Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1997.
27. D. E. Hanna, M. Glowacki-Dudka, and S. Conceição-Runlee, 147 Practical Tips for Teaching Online Groups, Atwood, Madison, Wisconsin, 2000.
28. M. G. Moore and J. T. Savrock, Distance Education in the Health Sciences, Penn State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania, 2001.
29. M. J. Moylan, Face-to-Face Screen/Video Conferencing Had Been Climbing as Companies Cut Travel Costs. Last Week’s Attacks are Bound to Increase Use of the Tool, St. Paul Pioneer Press, p. C-1, September 19, 2001.
30. L. Clemens, Preparing Technical Communication PhD Students to Teach at a Distance: Guidelines and Principles, unpublished thesis, University of Minnesota, 1999.
31. Survey of Collaborative Efforts, unpublished manuscript, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities and University of Minnesota, 2001.
32. CEOs for Cities & Initiative for a Competitive Inner City, Leveraging Colleges and Universities for Urban Economic Revitalization: An Action Agenda, 2002. http://www.ceosforcities.org, May 28, 2002.
33. B. J. Wahlstrom, Presentation to the University of Minnesota Board of Regents, September 7, 2002.