Teaching resource: Using monopoly tm and teams-gamestournaments in accounting education: A cooperative learning teaching resource

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 139-162

  Tanner, Margaret M ^a   Lindquist, Tim M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accounting education; Cooperative learning; Monopoly; Practice set; Teaching resource; Teams games tournaments

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066215244     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/096392898331225     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC). 1990. Objectives of education for accountants: position statement number one. Issues in Accounting Education, 5 (2) Fall: 307–312.
2. Biggs, W. D., 1987. Functional business games. Simulation and Games, 18 (2): 242–267.
3. Bligh, D., 1972. What's the Use of Lectures?, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
4. Bronfenbrenner, U., 1970. Two Worlds of Childhood, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5. Cottell, P., and Millis, B., 1992. Cooperative learning in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 10 (1): 95–111.
6. Cottell, P., and Millis, B., 1993. Cooperative learning structures in the instruction of accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 8 (1): 40–59.
7. Dansereau, D., 1983. Cooperative learning: impact on acquisition of knowledge and skills, Technical report #586 ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 243 088
8. Deutsch, M., 1949. An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and competition upon group process. Human Relations, 2 (2): 199–231.
9. DeVries, D., and Edwards, K., 1973. Learning games and student teams: their effects on classroom process. American Educational Research Journal, 10 (4): 307–318.
10. DeVries, D., and Edwards, K., 1974. Student teams and learning games: their effects on cross-race and cross-sex interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66 (5): 741–749.
11. DeVries, D., Edwards, K., and Wells, E., 1974. Teams-Games-Tournaments in the Social Studies Classroom: Effects on Academic Achievement, Student Attitudes, Cognitive Beliefs, and Classroom Climate, (Report No. 173) Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
12. DeVries, D., and Slavin, R., 1976. Teams-Games-Tournaments: A Final Report on the Research, Report No. 217 Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
13. DeVries, D., and Slavin, R., 1978. Teams-Games-Toumaments (TGT): review of ten classroom experiments. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12 (1): 28–38.
14. Edwards, K., and DeVries, D., 1972. Learning Games and Students Teams: Their Effects on Student Attitudes and Achievement, (Report No. 147) Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
15. Edwards, K., and DeVries, D., 1974. The Effects of Teams-Games-Tournaments and Two Structural Variations on Classroom Process, Student Attitudes, and Student Achievement, (Report No. 172) Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
16. Edwards, K., DeVries, D., and Snyder, J., 1972. Games and teams: a winning combination. Simulation and Games, 3 (3): 247–269.
17. Frierson, H., 1986. Two intervention methods: effects on groups of predominantly black nursing students' board scores. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19 (3): 18–23.
18. Hulten, B., and De Vries, D., 1976. Team Competition and Group Practice: Effects on Student Achievement and Attitudes, (Report No. 212) Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
19. 1994. “ Institute of Management Accountants and Financial Executives Institute ”. In What Corporate America Wants in Entry-Level Accountants, Montvale, NJ: The Institute for Management Accountants.
20. Johnson, D., and Johnson, R., 1987. Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Roy, P., and Zaidman, B., 1985. Oral interaction in cooperative learning groups: speaking, listening, and the nature of statements made by high-, medium-, and low achieving students. Journal of Psychology, 119 (4): 303–321.
22. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., and Smith, K., 1991. Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4 Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
23. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., and Taylor, B., 1993. Impact of cooperative and individualistic learning on high-ability students' achievement, self-esteem, and social acceptance. Journal of Social Psychology, 133 (6): 839–844.
24. Keys, B., and Wolfe, J., 1990. The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16 (2): 307–336.
25. Kinney, J., 1989. A study of the effects of a cooperative learning program on the achievement of ninth grade multi-cultural general biology classes, Virginia School Board. Paper submitted to the Alexandria City
26. Knechel, W., 1989. Using a business simulation game as a substitute for a practice set. Issues in Accounting Education, 4 (2): 411–424.
27. Knechel, W., and Rand, R., 1994. Will the AECC's course delivery recommendations work in the introductory accounting course? Some preliminary evidence. Journal of Accounting Education, 12 (3): 175–191.
28. Lindquist, T., 1995. Traditional versus contemporary goals and methods in accounting education: bridging the gap with cooperative learning. Journal of Education for Business, 70 (5): 278–884.
29. Lindquist, T., and Abraham, R., 1996. Whitepeak Corporation: a case analysis of a Jigsaw II application of cooperative learning, Accounting Education. A Journal of Theory, Practice and Research, 1 (2): 113–125.
30. Management Accounting (CIMA). 1994. Special Interest Group on Accounting Education, 72 (10): 10–11.
31. Okebukola, P., 1985. The relative effectiveness of cooperativeness and competitive interaction techniques in strengthening students' performance in science class. Science Education, 69 (4): 501–509.
32. Okebukola, P., and Jegede, O., 1990. Eco-cultural influences upon students' concept attainment in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (7): 661–669.
33. Owens, L., The learning mode preferences of secondary students: a three-country comparison-Australia, England. USA. Paper presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April20–241992, San Francisco, CA.
34. Owens, L., and Barnes, J., 1982. The relationships between cooperative, competitive, and individualized learning preferences and students' perceptions of classroom learning atmosphere. American Educational Research Journal, 19 (2): 182–200.
35. Peek, L., Winking, C., and Peek, G., 1995. Cooperative learning activities: managerial accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 10 (1): 111–125.
36. Ravenscroft, S., Buckless, F., McCombs, G., and Zuckennan, G., 1995. Incentives in student team learning: an experiment in cooperative group learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 10 (1): 97–109.
37. Roethlisberger, F., 1941. Management and Morale, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Sandler, B., Silverberg, L., and Hale, R., 1996. The Chilly Classroom Climate: A Guide to Improve the Education of Women, Washington, DC: The National Association for Women in Education.
39. Schuman, H., and Presser, S., 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context, Orlando: Academic Press.
40. Schwan, E., 1994. Fine tuning the MONOPOLY Practice Set. Accounting Instructors' Report, 13 (1): 4–5.
41. Sherif, M., and Sherif, C., 1953. Groups in Harmony and Tension, New York: Harper.
42. Slavin, R., 1977. A student team approach to teaching adolescents with special emotional and behavioral needs. Psychology in the Schools, 14 (1): 77–84.
43. Slavin, R., 1995. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice, 2nd edn, Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster Company.
44. Triesman, P., 1985. A Study of Mathematics Performance of Black Students at the University of California, Berkeley: Dissertation Abstracts International. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley), 47-05A, 1641
45. Wheeler, R., and Ryan, R., 1973. Effects of cooperative and competitive classroom environments on the attitudes and achievements of elementary school students engage in social studies inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65 (3): 402–407.