Research support libraries group: Final report

New Review of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 3-86

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066199745     PISSN: 13614533     EISSN: 17407834     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13614530209516827     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. 2001. “ Co‐ordinating the distributed national collection of research resources ”. In Report for the Higher Education/British Library Task Force http://www.bl.uk/concord/pdf_files/blhe‐dnc.pdf
2. (2001) Report from the Higher Education/British Library Task Force to the Research Support Libraries Group. http://www.bl.uk/concord/pdf_files/blhe‐overview.pdf
3. ACT IV CONSULTING (2001) Report on JSTOR. Unpublished.
4. ADAMS, Jonathan. 1997. Benchmarking of the international standing of research in England. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/benchmark/BENCHMRK.PDF
5. ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES. 2000. Principles for emerging systems of scholarly publishing. http://www.arl.org/scomm/tempe.html
6. BENNET, Liz. 2001. Guest editorial: Electronic publishing in the new millennium. Learned Publishing, 14: 243–246.
7. BREAKS, Michael. 2001. The eLib Hybrid Library Projects. Ariadne, 28 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue28/hybrid/
8. BROWN, David. 2001. The document delivery disgrace?. Library Association Record, 103(10): 610–611.
9. BULL, Rob., 2001. Feasibility study for a National Union Catalogue. http://www.uknuc.shef.ac.uk/
10. CANADIAN NATIONAL SITE LICENSING PROJECTS. 2001. CNSLP License Procurement, 2000–2001. Unpublished
11. CARR, Reg. 2002. “ Towards the academic digital library in the UK: a national perspective ”. In Global Issues in 21st Century Research Librarianship, 221–233. Helsinki: Nordinfo. 2002
12. CARR, Reg. Towards the hybrid library: the national perspective in the UK. Presentation to the MALIBU Conference. March262001. http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/librarian/malibu2001/malibu2001.htm
13. CASE, Mary M., 2001. The impact of serial costs on library collections. ARL Bimonthly Report, 218 http://www.arl.Org/newsltr/218/costimpact.html
14. CROSSNET SYSTEMS Ltd. 1998. CURL Feasibility study to investigate potential applications and strategic implications of Z39.50 technology on the COPAC Service http://www.curl.ac.uk/projects/z3950.pdf
15. DEMPSEY, Lorcan, and PINFIELD, Stephen. 2001. The Distributed National Electronic Resource (DNER) and the hybrid library. Ariadne, 26 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue26/dner/
16. EDUCATION FOR CHANGE Ltd. 2002. SIRU UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON and THE RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP. Researchers’ use of libraries and other information sources: current patterns and future trends http://www.rslg.ac.uk/research/
17. EDUCATION FOR CHANGE Ltd. 2000. Mutual benefit: a map of the co‐operative landscape (A study undertaken for The British Library Cooperation and Partnership Programme). http://www.bl.uk/concord/mapping/mappage.html
18. EDUCATION FOR CHANGE Ltd. 2000. PURCEL: Planning decisions of electronic resources in higher education institutions (Draft report on a research study for JISC JCALT). http://www.library.sunderland.ac.uk/jisc/surveys_report/index_html
19. EVIDENCE LTD. 2002. Maintaining research excellence and volume. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/Pubs/RDreports/
20. FOSTER, Andrea L., 2002. Second thoughts on “bundled” e‐journals. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(4): A31 http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i04/04a03101.htm
21. HANNANT, Mike, and LEGGATE, Peter. 2000. The archiving of online journals. Learned Publishing, 13: 246–250.
22. HIGHER EDUCATION CONSULTANCY GROUP and CHEMS CONSULTING. 2002. A Report to the RSLP on: Barriers to resource sharing among higher education libraries. http://www.rslp.ac.uk/circs/
23. HM TREASURY. 2002. Cross‐cutting review of science and research: final report. http://www.hm‐treasury.gov.uk/Spending_Review/spend_ccr/spend_ccr_science.cfm
24. HM TREASURY. 2002. Investing in innovation: a strategy for science, engineering and technology. http://www.hm‐treasury.gov.uk/Spending_ Review/spend_sr02/spend_sr02_science.cfm
25. HOUGHTON, John. 2002. The crisis in scholarly communications: an economic analysis. http://www.vala.org.au/vala2002/2002pdf/l6Houton.pdf
26. HOUSE OF COMMONS Education and Skills Select Committee. 2002. Library resources for higher education. Fifth Report of Session 2001–02 http:.publications.parliment.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmeduski/804/8040 2.htm
27. INFORMATION POWER Ltd. 2002. “ Serials Union CATalogue (SUNCAT) scoping study ”. In Final Report to JISC, RSLP and the British Library http://www.rslp.ac.uk/circs/2002/suncat.doc
28. INFORMATION STRATEGY RESEARCH UNIT at the University of Brighton. 2002. Collaboration in research library provision: international comparisons. http://www.rslg.ac.uk/research/
29. JISC Scholarly Communications Group. 2002. Final Report from the JISC Scholarly Communications Group (SCG) to the Research Support Libraries Group (RSLG) http://www.jisc.ac.uk/jcie/scg/
30. JM CONSULTING Ltd. 2002. Review of costs of research libraries in HE. Unpublished
31. Joint Funding Councils’ Libraries Review. 1993. “ Joint Funding Councils’ Libraries Review Group: report ”. The Follett Report http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/papers/follett/report/
32. Joint Funding Councils’ Libraries Review. 1996. Report of the Group on a national/regional strategy for library provision for researchers, The Anderson Report http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/other/anderson/
33. KING, Donald W., and TENOPIR, Carol. 2001. Electronic journals: how user behaviour is changing (Online Information 2001 conference proceedings). http://www.online‐information.co.uk/proceedings/(restricted)
34. KIRCZ, Joost G., 2001. New practices for electronic publishing 1: Will the scientific paper keep its form?. Learned Publishing, 14: 265–272.
35. LIBRARY AND INFORMATION STATISTICS UNIT, Loughborough University. 2002. Trends in scholarly communication: output, access and use issues. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/jcie/scg/
36. LYON, Liz, and POWELL, Andy. 2002. The JISC information environment and web services. Ariadne, 31 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue31/information‐environments/
37. MILNE, Ronald, and SMITH, Geoff. 2001. Towards a national strategy for research support. Library Association Record, 103(7): 417–418.
38. NICHOLSON, Dennis. 1999. Clumping towards a UK National Catalogue?. Ariadne, 22 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue22/distributed/distukcat.html
39. O'CONNOR, Steve. 2001. “ A study of collaborative storage of library resources ”. In Report for the Higher Education/British Library Task Force http://www.bl.uk/concord/pdf_files/blhe‐colstor.pdf
40. OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING. 2002. The market for scientific, technical and medical journals. http://www.oft.gov.uk/News/Press+releases/2002/PN+55‐ 02+Can+the+scientific+journals+market+work+better.htm
41. PEARSON, David. 2001. Digitisation: do we have a strategy?. Ariadne, 30 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue30/digilib/
42. PINFIELD, Stephen. 2001. Managing electronic library services: current issues in UK higher education institutions. Ariadne, 29 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue29/pinfield/
43. PIRA INTERNATIONAL. 2002. Publishing in the knowledge economy. http://www.uk‐publishing.info/competitive.asp
44. POTHEN, Philip. 2001. The DNER: weaving rich information and learning resources in the fabric of the web. (Online Information 2001 conference proceedings). http://www.online‐information.co.uk/proceedings/online/2001/pothen_p.asp (restricted)
45. ROWLEY, Jennifer. 2000. JISC User Behaviour Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: First Annual Report http://www.jisc.ac.uk/pub00/m&e_repl.html Table 4.13
46. RUSBRIDGE, Chris. 2001. After eLib. Ariadne, 26 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue26/chris/
47. SCONUL. 2002. Annual library statistics 2000–01.
48. STUBLEY, Peter. What gave the clumps ever done for us?. Ariadne, 23 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue23/stubley/
49. TFPL Ltd. 2001. Journal publishing statistics survey (a report for the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers). http://www.alpsp.org/TFPLreport.pdf
50. TURNER, Rollo. 2001. Where next for consortium buying?. Library Association Record, 103(7): 424–425.
51. WYLY, Brendan J., 1998. Competition in scholarly publishing? What publishers’ profits reveal. ARL Newsletter, 200 http://www.arl.org/newsltr/200/wyly.html