Politics and practice of research in the public domain: A case study in Australia

Cultures, Politics, and Research Programs: An International Assessment of Practical Problems in Field Research

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 213-235

  Penman, Robyn ^a   Sless, David ^a  

^a Communication Research Institute of Australia ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065954007     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203052198     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Beed, T. (1986). Whose calling the shots: A review of research sources for Australian advertisers. Sydney: Australian Advertising Research Foundation
2. Bernstein, R. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Oxford: Blackwell
3. Castles, A. (1986). Australian mathematical competence. CARE Newsletter, 3, 3
4. Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press
5. Hovland, C, Janis, I., & Kelley, H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press
6. McGuire, W. (1986). The myth of massive media impact: Savagings and salvagings. In G. Comstock (Ed.), Public communication and behavior (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press
7. Ministerial Committee on Government Information and Advertising. (1987). Guidelines for Australian government information activities-Principles and procedures
8. Morehead, A. (1988). Informing the public-The bureaucratic view. Paper presented at the Sociological Association of Australia and New Zealand Annual Conference, Canberra, Australia
9. Pearce, W.B., & Cronen, V. (1980). Communication, action and meaning. New York: Praeger
10. Penman, R. (1982). Problems in human communication studies: Another argument. Australian Journal of Communication, 1 2, 52-56
11. Penman, R. (1988). Communication reconstructed. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 18, 301-310
12. Penman, R. (1989). Good theory and good practice: An argument in progress. Paper presented at the 10th annual Discourse Analysis Conference, Philadelphia, PA
13. Penman, R. (in preparation). Goals, games and moral orders: A paradoxical case in courts. In K. Tracy (Ed.), Goals and discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
14. Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. London: Cambridge Press
15. Rogers, D. (1988) Belabouring communication: Thought and action on communication in the Australian Labor Party. Paper presented at the Sociological Association of Australia and New Zealand Annual Conference, Canberra, Australia
16. Sensat, J. (1979). Habermas and Marxism. London: Sage
17. Sless, D. (1981). Learning and visual communication. London: Croom Helm
18. Sless, D. (1983). What we make messages do. In T. Smith (Ed.), Communication in Australia. Warrnambool: Warrnambool Institute Press
19. Sless, D. (1985). Whose image? In G. Osborne, T. Smith, & R. Penman (Eds.), Communication and government. Canberra: Canberra CAE Press
20. Sless, D. (1986). In search of semiotics. London: Croom Helm
21. Sless, D. (1988a). Forms of control. Australian Journal of Communication, 14, 57-69
22. Sless, D. (1988b). Media magic. Media Information Australia, 48, 21-24
23. Toulmin, S. (1982). The construal of reality: Criticism in modern and postmodern science. Critical Inquiry, 9, 93-111
24. Wheeler, J., Misner, C, & Thome, K. (1973). Gravitation. San Francisco: Freeman
25. Williams, F. (1984). The new communications. Belmont: Wadsworth