Meta-analysis for single-case research

Single-Case Research Design and Analysis: New Directions for Psychology and Education

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 187-212

  Busk, Patricia L ^a   Serlin, Ronald C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065947134     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315725994     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Allport, G. W. (1962). The general and unique in psychological science. Journal ofPersonality, 30, 405-422.
2. Andrews, G., Guitar, B., & Howie, P. (1980). Meta-analysis of the effects of stuttering treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorder, 45, 287-307.
3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1986). Review of developments in meta-analytic method. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 388-399.
4. Blimling, G. S. (1988). Meta-analysis: A statistical method for integrating the results of empirical studies. Journal ofCollege StudentDevelopment, 29, 543-549.
5. Busk, P. L., & Marascuilo, L. A. (1988). Autocorrelation in single-subject research: A counterargument to the myth of no autocorrelation. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 229-242.
6. Center, B. A., Skiba, R. J., & Casey, A. (1985-1986). A methodology for the quantitative synthesis of intra-subject design research. Journal ofSpecial Education, 19, 387-400.
7. Chou, Y. (1985). A remark on algorithm AS5: The integral of the noncentral t distribution. Applied Statistics, 34, 102.
8. Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1980). Reviewing the literature: A comparison of traditional methods with meta-analysis. Journal of Personality, 48, 449-472.
9. Cooper, B. H. (1968). Algorithm AS5: The integral of the noncentral t distribution. Applied Statistics, 17, 193-194.
10. Cooper, H. M. (1982). Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative reviews. Review ofEducational Research, 52, 291-302.
11. Corcoran, K. J. (1985). Aggregrating the idiographic data of single-subject research. Social Work Research andAbstracts, 9-12.
12. Edgington, E. S. (1980). Overcoming obstacles to single-subject experimentation. Journal ofEducational Statistics, 5, 261-267.
13. Eysenck, H. J. (1978). An exercise in mega-silliness. American Psychologist, 33, 517.
14. Gingerich, W. J. (1984). Meta-analysis of applied time-series data. Journal ofApplied Behavioral Science, 20, 71-79.
15. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. EducationalResearcher, 5, 3-8.
16. Glass, G. V. (1978). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review ofResearch in Education, 5, 351-379.
17. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. L. (1979). Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 2-16.
19. Hartmann, D. P., & Gardner, W. (1982, November). Some thoughts on the application of metaanalytic procedures to single subject studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting o f the Association of Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Los Angeles.
20. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
21. Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. H. (1976). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press.
22. Huitema, B. E. (1985). Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. BehavioralAssessment, 7, 107-118.
23. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods ofmeta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in researchfindings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1983). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Jackson, G. B. (1978). Methods for reviewing and integrating research in the social sciences. Final Report to the National Science Foundation for Grant No. D 1576-20309. Social Science Research Group, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
26. Jackson, G. B. (1980). Methods for integrative reviews. Review ofEducational Research, 50, 438-460.
27. Kazdin, A. (1984). Statistical analysis for single-case experimental designs. In D. H. Barlow & M. Hersen (Eds.), Single case experimental designs (2nd ed., pp. 285-324). New York: Pergamon Press.
28. Kirk, R. E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA:Brooks/Cole.
29. Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. L. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1979). A meta-analysis of outcome studies of Keller’s personalized system of instruction. American Psychologist, 37, 307-318.
30. Levin, J. R., Marascuilo, L. A., & Hubert, L. J. (1978). N = nonparametric randomization tests. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change (pp. 167-196). New York: Academic Press.
31. Light, R. J., & Pillmer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Light, R. J., & Smith, P. V. (1971). Accumulating evidence: Procedures for resolving contradictions among different research studies. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 429-471.
33. Marascuilo, L. A., & Busk, P. L. (1988). Combining statistics for multiple-baseline AB and replicated ABAB designs across subjects. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 1-28.
34. Marascuilo, L. A., Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1988). Large sample multivariate procedures for comparing and combining effect sizes within a single study. Journal ofExperimental Education, 57, 69-85.
35. Marascuilo, L. A., & McSweeney, M. A. (1977). Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
36. Marascuilo, L. A., & Serlin, R. C. (1988). Statistics methods for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Freeman.
37. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1985-1986). Early intervention for socially withdrawn children. Journal of Special Education, 19, 429-441.
38. McCuller, B., & Salzberg, C. I. (1982). The functional analysis of imitation. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), International review ofresearch in mental retardation (Vol. 11, pp. 285-320). New York:Academic Press.
39. McLaughlin, F. E., & Marascuilo, L. A. (1990). Advanced nursing and health care research:Quantification approaches. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
40. Miller, P. M. (1973). An experimental analysis of retention control training in the treatment of noctumal enuresis in two institutionalized adolescents. Behavior Therapy, 4, 288-294.
41. Mullen, B., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Basic meta-analysis: Procedures and programs. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Nietzel, M. T., & Trull, T. J. (1988). Metal-analytic approaches to social comparisons: A method for measuring clinical significance. BehavioralAssessment, 10, 159-169.
43. Puri, M. L., & Sen, P. K. (1985). Nonparametric methods in general linear models. New York:Wiley.
44. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Comparing effect sizes of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 500-504.
45. Salzberg, C. L., Strain, P. S., & Baer, D. M. (1987). Meta-analysis for single-subject research:When does it clarify, when does it obscure? Remedial and Special Education, 8, 43-48.
46. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987a). The quantitative synthesis of singlesubject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24-33.
47. Scruggs, T E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987b). Reply to Owen White. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 40-42.
48. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Cook, S. B., & Escobar, C. (1986). Early interventions for developmental functioning: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 260-271.
49. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Fomess, S. R. (1988). Early language interventions: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Journal ofSpecial Education, 22, 259-283.
50. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McEwen, T. (1988). Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: The quantitative synthesis. Journalfor the Division of Early Childhood, 12, 359-367.
51. Serlin, R. C., & Lapsley, D. K. (1985). Rationality in psychological research: The good-enough principle. American Psychologist, 40, 73-83.
52. Serlin, R. C., & Lapsley, D. K. (1986, April). Exact tests and confidence intervals for effect sizes and measures ofassociation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
53. Sharpley, C. F., & Alavosius, M. P. (1988). Autocorrelation in behavioral data: An alternative perspective. BehavioralAssessment, 10, 243-251.
54. Skiba, R. J., Casey, A., & Center, B. A. (1985-1986). Nonaversive procedures in the treatment of classroom behavior. Journal ofSpecial Education, 19, 459-481.
55. Slavin, R. E. (1984). Meta-analysis in education: How has it been used? Educational Researcher, 13, 6-15.
56. Smoot, S., & Curlette, W. (1990, April). Meta-analysis ofsingle-subject research in education: A common metric and a computerized method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
57. Strube, M. J., Gardner, W., & Hartmann, D. P. (1985). Limitations, liabilities, and obstacles in reviews of the literature: The current status of meta-analysis. Clinical PsychologyReview, 5, 63-78.
58. Strube, M. J., & Hartmann, D. P. (1982). A critical appraisal of meta-analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 129-139.
59. Strube, M. J., & Hartmann, D. P. (1983). Meta-analysis: Techniques, applications, and functions. Journal ofConsulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 14-27.
60. Suen, N. K. (1987). On the epistemology of autocorrelation in applied behavioral analysis. BehavioralAssessment, 9, 113-124.
61. Suen, H. S., & Ary, D. (1987). Application of statistical power in assessing autocorrelation. BehavioralAssessment, 9, 125-130.
62. Tiku, M. L. (1986). Robust inference. New York: Marcel Dekker.
63. Wampold, B. E., & Worsham, N. L. (1986). Randomization tests for multiple-baseline designs. BehavioralAssessment, 8, 135-143.
64. White, D. M., Rusch, F. R., Kazdin, A. E., & Hartmann, D. P. (1989). Applications of meta analysis in individual-subject research. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 281-296.
65. White, O. R. (1987). Some comments concerning “The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research.�? Remedial and Special Education, 8, 34-39.
66. Wilson, G. T., & Rachman, S. J. (1983). Meta-analysis and the evaluation of psychotherapy outcome:Limitations and liabilities. Journal ofConsulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 54-64.
67. Wilson, V. L., & Putman, R. R. (1982). A meta-analysis of pretest sensitization effects in experimental design. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 249-258.