Training and Education: Human Factors Considerations for Automated Driving Systems

Lecture Notes in Mobility

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 77-84

  Pradhan, Anuj K ^a   Sullivan, John ^a   Schwarz, Chris ^b   Feng, Fred ^a   Bao, Shan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated Driving Systems (ADS); Automated Vehicle Symposium; Current Deployment; Human Factors Researchers; National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA)

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065871690     PISSN: 21965544     EISSN: 21965552     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94896-6_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. SAE On-road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee (2014) Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE International
2. Lee JD, Moray N (1994) Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation. Int J Hum Comput Stud 40(1):153–184
3. Sheridan TB (1987) Supervisory control. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbook of human factors. Wiley, New York, pp 1243–1268
4. Dickie DA, Boyle LN (2009) Drivers’ understanding of adaptive cruise control limitations. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 53(23):1806–1810
5. McDonald AB, McGehee DV, Chrysler ST, Askelson NM, Angell LS, Seppelt BD (2016) National survey identifying gaps in consumer knowledge of advanced vehicle safety systems. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2559:1–6
6. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2013) Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. Washington, D.C.
7. Horswill MS, Taylor K, Newnam S, Wetton M, Hill A (2013) Even highly experienced drivers benefit from a brief hazard perception training intervention. Accid Anal Prev 52 (28):100–110
8. Pradhan AK, Pollatsek A, Knodler M, Fisher DL (2009) Can younger drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their risk in roadway traffic scenarios that are hard to identify as hazardous? Ergonomics 52(6):657–673
9. McDonald AB, Reyes ML, Row CA, Friberg JE, Faust KS, McGehee DV (2016) University of Iowa Technology Demonstration Study
10. Parasuraman R, Riley V (1997) Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse abuse. Hum Factors 39(2):230–253
11. Moray N, Inagaki T (2000) Attention and complacency. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 1:354–365
12. Parasuraman R, Molloy R, Singh IL (1993) Performance consequences of automation-induced ‘‘complacency’’. Int J Aviat Psychol 3:1–23
13. Wickens CD, Hollands JG (2000) Engineering psychology and human performance, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
14. Lee JD, See KA (2004) Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum Factors 46(1):50
15. Carroll JM, Olson JR (1988) Mental models in human-computer interaction. In: Helander M (ed) Hand book of human-computer interaction, vol 2. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, North-Holland, pp 45–65
16. Skitka LJ, Mosier KL, Burdick M (2000) Accountability and automation bias. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:701–717
17. Bahner JE, Hüper AD, Manzey D (2008) Misuse of automated decision aids: complacency, automation bias and the impact of training experience. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66(9):688–699
18. Sauer J, Chavaillaz A, Wastell D (2016) Experience of automation failures in training: effects on trust, automation bias, complacency and performance. Ergonomics 59(6):767–780