Strategies on implementation of waste-to-energy (WTE) supply chain for circular economy system: a review

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 108, Issue , 2015, Pages 409-421

  Pan, Shu Yuan ^a   Du, Michael Alex ^b   Huang, I Te ^c   Liu, I Hung ^c   Chang, E E ^d   Chiang, Pen Chi ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Taiwan)

^d TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Business model; Combined heat and power; District energy system; Industrial park; Municipal solid waste

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; GREENHOUSE GASES; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; SUPPLY CHAINS; WASTE INCINERATION;

BIO-ENERGY; BUSINESS MODELING; COMBINED HEAT AND POWER; DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL PARKS;

MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE;

EID: 85065732447     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.124     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Abadie, L.M., Ortiz, R.A., Galarraga, I., Determinants of energy efficiency investments in the US. Energy Policy 45 (2012), 551–566.
2. Abdelaziz, E.A., Saidur, R., Mekhilef, S., A review on energy saving strategies in industrial sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15 (2011), 150–168.
3. Achillas, C., Vlachokostas, C., Moussiopoulos, N., Banias, G., Kafetzopoulos, G., Karagiannidis, A., Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55 (2011), 857–863.
4. Adams, P.W.R., McManus, M.C., Small-scale biomass gasification CHP utilisation in industry: energy and environmental evaluation. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 6 (2014), 129–140.
5. Afroz, R., Masud, M.M., Akhtar, R., Duasa, J.B., Survey and analysis of public knowledge, awareness and willingness to pay in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia – a case study on household WEEE management. J. Clean. Prod. 52 (2013), 185–193.
6. Amiri, S., Henning, D., Karlsson, B.G., Simulation and introduction of a CHP plant in a Swedish biogas system. Renew. Energy 49 (2013), 242–249.
7. Assamoi, B., Lawryshyn, Y., The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion. Waste Manag. 32 (2012), 1019–1030.
8. Avami, A., Assessment of optimal biofuel supply chain planning in Iran: technical, economic, and agricultural perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 26 (2013), 761–768.
9. Behera, S.K., Kim, J.-H., Lee, S.-Y., Suh, S., Park, H.-S., Evolution of ‘designed’ industrial symbiosis networks in the Ulsan Eco-industrial Park: ‘research and development into business’ as the enabling framework. J. Clean. Prod. 29–30 (2012), 103–112.
10. Borowski, S., Domanski, J., Weatherley, L., Anaerobic co-digestion of swine and poultry manure with municipal sewage sludge. Waste Manag. 34 (2014), 513–521.
11. Burmeister & Wain Energy, Burmeister & wain energy A/S: utilisation of multi fuel boilers for enhancement of energy efficiency. Conference on Elevating Power Plant Efficiency and Regional Heat/Air Conditioning Supply, Taipei, Taiwan (ROC), 2011.
12. Cambero, C., Sowlati, T., Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives – a review of literature. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 36 (2014), 62–73.
13. Carlsson, M., Lagerkvist, A., Morgan-Sagastume, F., The effects of substrate pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion systems: a review. Waste Manag. 32 (2012), 1634–1650.
14. Carraro, C., Favero, A., Massetti, E., “Investments and public finance in a green, low carbon, economy”. Energy Econ. 34 (2012), S15–S28.
15. Chen, Y.T., Chen, C.C., The privatization effect of MSW incineration services by using data envelopment analysis. Waste Manag. 32 (2012), 595–602.
16. Commonwealth of Australia, Economic Statement. 2013, Commonwealth of Australia.
17. Damgaard, A., Riber, C., Fruergaard, T., Hulgaard, T., Christensen, T.H., Life-cycle-assessment of the historical development of air pollution control and energy recovery in waste incineration. Waste Manag. 30 (2010), 1244–1250.
18. De Lange, W.J., Stafford, W.H., Forsyth, G.G., Le Maitre, D.C., Incorporating stakeholder preferences in the selection of technologies for using invasive alien plants as a bio-energy feedstock: applying the analytical hierarchy process. J. Environ. Manag. 99 (2012), 76–83.
19. De Meyer, A., Cattrysse, D., Rasinmäki, J., Van Orshoven, J., Methods to optimise the design and management of biomass-for-bioenergy supply chains: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 31 (2014), 657–670.
20. Dong, H., Geng, Y., Xi, F., Fujita, T., Carbon footprint evaluation at industrial park level: a hybrid life cycle assessment approach. Energy Policy 57 (2013), 298–307.
21. Ellen Macarthur Foundation, Toward the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. 2012, Ellen Macarthur Foundation.
22. Evangelisti, S., Lettieri, P., Borello, D., Clift, R., Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study. Waste Manag. 34 (2014), 226–237.
23. 2 emissions using a system approach. SETAC Europe 14th LCA Case Studies Symposium, Göteborg, Sweden, 2007.
24. Fruergaard, T., Hyks, J., Astrup, T., Life-cycle assessment of selected management options for air pollution control residues from waste incineration. Sci. Total Environ. 408 (2010), 4672–4680.
25. Geng, Y., Fu, J., Sarkis, J., Xue, B., Towards a national circular economy indicator system in China: an evaluation and critical analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 23 (2012), 216–224.
26. Glaeser, E.L., Kahn, M.E., The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. J. Urban Econ. 67 (2010), 404–418.
27. Hagos, D.A., Gebremedhin, A., Zethraeus, B., Towards a flexible energy system – a case study for Inland Norway. Appl. Energy 130 (2014), 41–50.
28. Hawkey, D., Webb, J., Winskel, M., Organisation and governance of urban energy systems: district heating and cooling in the UK. J. Clean. Prod. 50 (2013), 22–31.
29. Hedrick, J., The Pellet Fuels Institute Announces Agreement with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Industry Groups. 2013, Pellet Fuels Institute, Arlington, VA.
30. Huttunen, S., Manninen, K., Leskinen, P., Combining biogas LCA reviews with stakeholder interviews to analyse life cycle impacts at a practical level. J. Clean. Prod. 80 (2014), 5–16.
31. Iakovou, E., Karagiannidis, A., Vlachos, D., Toka, A., Malamakis, A., Waste biomass-to-energy supply chain management: a critical synthesis. Waste Manag. 30 (2010), 1860–1870.
32. International Energy Agency (IEA), Cogeneration and District Energy: Sustainable Energy Technologies for Today and Tomorrow. 2009, OECD/IEA, France.
33. Jamasb, T., Nepal, R., Issues and options in waste management: a social cost-benefit analysis of waste-to-energy in the UK. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54 (2010), 1341–1352.
34. Kirkeby, J.T., Birgisdottir, H., Hansen, T.L., Christensen, T.H., Bhander, G.S., Hauschild, M., Environmental assessment of solid waste systems and technologies: EASEWASTE. Waste Manag. Res. 24 (2006), 3–15.
35. Klein, R., Baumann, T., Kahapka, E., Niessner, R., Temperature development in a modern municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ash landfill with regard to sustainable waste management. J. Hazard. Mater. B83 (2001), 265–280.
36. Liu, Q., Li, H.-m., Zuo, X.-l., Zhang, F.-f., Wang, L., A survey and analysis on public awareness and performance for promoting circular economy in China: a case study from Tianjin. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (2009), 265–270.
37. Longden, D., Brammer, J., Bastin, L., Cooper, N., Distributed or centralised energy-from-waste policy? Implications of technology and scale at municipal level. Energy Policy 35 (2007), 2622–2634.
38. Lux Research Inc, The Cleantech Report: Waste to Energy., 2007, 187–193.
39. Madsen, M., Holm-Nielsen, J.B., Esbensen, K.H., Monitoring of anaerobic digestion processes: a review perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15 (2011), 3141–3155.
40. Maier, S., Oliveira, L.B., Economic feasibility of energy recovery from solid waste in the light of Brazil's waste policy: the case of Rio de Janeiro. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 35 (2014), 484–498.
41. Maraver, D., Sin, A., Sebastián, F., Royo, J., Environmental assessment of CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems based on biomass combustion in comparison to conventional generation. Energy 57 (2013), 17–23.
42. Matos, S., Silvestre, B.S., Managing stakeholder relations when developing sustainable business models: the case of the Brazilian energy sector. J. Clean. Prod. 45 (2013), 61–73.
43. Ma, S.-h., Wen, Z.-g., Chen, J.-n., Wen, Z.-c., Mode of circular economy in China's iron and steel industry: a case study in Wu'an city. J. Clean. Prod. 64 (2014), 505–512.
44. Monni, S., From landfilling to waste incineration: implications on GHG emissions of different actors. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 8 (2012), 82–89.
45. Munir, S.M., Abdul Manan, Z., Wan Alwi, S.R., Holistic carbon planning for industrial parks: a waste-to-resources process integration approach. J. Clean. Prod. 33 (2012), 74–85.
46. Nordberg, Å., Treatment of Animal Waste in Co-digestion Biogas Plants in Sweden. 2013, JTI – Swedish Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering.
47. Puppim de Oliveira, J.A., Doll, C.N.H., Balaban, O., Jiang, P., Dreyfus, M., Suwa, A., Moreno-Peñaranda, R., Dirgahayani, P., Green economy and governance in cities: assessing good governance in key urban economic processes. J. Clean. Prod. 58 (2013), 138–152.
48. Pagés-Díaz, J., Pereda-Reyes, I., Taherzadeh, M.J., Sárvári-Horváth, I., Lundin, M., Anaerobic co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse wastes with agro-residues: synergistic and antagonistic interactions determined in batch digestion assays. Chem. Eng. J. 245 (2014), 89–98.
49. Park, J., Sarkis, J., Wu, Z., Creating integrated business and environmental value within the context of China's circular economy and ecological modernization. J. Clean. Prod. 18 (2010), 1494–1501.
50. Parrish, D.D., Singh, H.B., Molina, L., Madronich, S., Air quality progress in North American megacities: a review. Atmos. Environ. 45 (2011), 7015–7025.
51. Pavlas, M., Touš, M., Klimek, P., Bébar, L., Waste incineration with production of clean and reliable energy. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 13 (2011), 595–605.
52. Polanec, B., Aberšek, B., Glodež, S., Informal education and awareness of the public in the field of waste management. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 83 (2013), 107–111.
53. Raven, R.P.J.M., Gregersen, K.H., Biogas plants in Denmark: successes and setbacks. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11 (2007), 116–132.
54. Reis, M.F., Solid Waste Incinerators: Health Impacts. 2011, Institute of Preventive Medicine, University of Lisbon.
55. Rezaie, B., Rosen, M.A., District heating and cooling: review of technology and potential enhancements. Appl. Energy 93 (2012), 2–10.
56. Riber, C., Bhander, G.S., Christensen, T.H., Environmental assessment of waste incineration in a life-cycle-perspective (EASEWASTE). Waste Manag. Res. 26 (2008), 96–103.
57. Saha, S., Roy, T.B., Assessment of the status of solid waste management in mega cities in India: an overview. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 4 (2011), 305–315.
58. Sarkar, A., Singh, J., Financing energy efficiency in developing countries – lessons learned and remaining challenges. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 5560–5571.
59. Sharma, B., Ingalls, R.G., Jones, C.L., Khanchi, A., Biomass supply chain design and analysis: basis, overview, modeling, challenges, and future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 24 (2013), 608–627.
60. Shewhart, W.A., Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product/50th Anniversary Commemorative Issue, American Society for Quality. 1930 December 1980.
61. Shih, S.M., Wang, S., Zhang, C.C., Wang, T.F., Chiang, P.C., Ji, C.J., Taiwan 21 Agenda. 2004, National Development Council, Taiwan (ROC).
62. Sovacool, B.K., The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy-efficiency policy. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 1529–1541.
63. Steiner, A., Focusing on the good or the bad: what can international environmental law do to accelerate the transition towards a green economy. Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 843 (2010), 843–875.
64. Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., Yu, X., A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation. J. Clean. Prod. 42 (2013), 215–227.
65. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, A Strategy for Sustainable Waste Management: Sweden's Wastes Plan. 2005, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Bromma.
66. Tabasová, A., Kropáč, J., Kermes, V., Nemet, A., Stehlík, P., Waste-to-energy technologies: impact on environment. Energy 44 (2012), 146–155.
67. The World Bank, Waste Composition, What a Waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. 2012, World Bank, USA, 16–21.
68. Tukker, A., Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review. J. Clean. Prod., 2013.
69. UNEP, Measuring Progress towards an Inclusive Green Economy. 2012, UNEP.
70. USEPA, Aqueous Sludge Gasification Technologies. Greenhouse Gas Technology Center. 2012, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, USA.
71. Wen, Z., Meng, X., Quantitative assessment of industrial symbiosis for the promotion of circular economy: a case study of the printed circuit boards industry in China's Suzhou New District. J. Clean. Prod. 90 (2015), 211–219.
72. West, J., Bailey, I., Winter, M., Renewable energy policy and public perceptions of renewable energy: a cultural theory approach. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 5739–5748.
73. White, W., Lunnan, A., Nybakk, E., Kulisic, B., The role of governments in renewable energy: the importance of policy consistency. Biomass Bioenergy 57 (2013), 97–105.
74. Wilkinson, K.G., A comparison of the drivers influencing adoption of on-farm anaerobic digestion in Germany and Australia. Biomass Bioenergy 35 (2011), 1613–1622.
75. Wright, R.A., Back river wastewater treatment plant: energy saving performance contract biogas-fueled CHP. 2008 U.S. Combined Heat and Power Partnership Partners Meeting, Washington DC, U.S.A, 2008.
76. Wu, D.W., Wang, R.Z., Combined cooling, heating and power: a review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 32 (2006), 459–495.