Phonological determinants of grammatical variation in English: Chomsky's worst possible case

Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 69-118

  Schlüter, Julia ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065688446     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110900019.69     Document Type: Chapter

References (96)

1. Aitchison, Jean and Guy Bailey 1979 Unhappiness about not unhappy people. Journal of Linguistics 15: 245-266.
2. Allen, George D. 1975 Speech rhythm: Its relation to performance universals and articulatory timing. Journal of Phonetics 3: 75-86.
3. Allen, George D. and Sarah Hawkins 1978 The development of phonological rhythm. In: Alan Bell and Joan Bybee Hooper (eds.), Syllables and Segments, 173-185. Amsterdam: North Holland.
4. Anttila, Arto 1997 Deriving variation from grammar. In: Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout and Leo Wetzels (eds.), Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, 35-68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
5. Anttila, Arto and Young-mee Yu Cho 1998 Variation and change in Optimality Theory. Lingua 104: 31-56.
6. Archangeli, Diana 1997 Optimality Theory: An introduction to linguistics in the 1990s. In: Diana Archangeli and D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Optimality Theory: An Overview, 1-32. Maiden, MA./Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7. Barber, Charles and Nicholas Barber 1990 The versification of The Canterbury Tales: A computer-based statistical study, Part I. Leeds Studies in English 21: 81-103.
8. Bauer, Laurie 1997 A class of English irregular verbs. English Studies 78: 545-555.
9. Bell, Alan and Joan Bybee Hooper 1978 Issues and evidence in syllabic phonology. In: Alan Bell and Joan Bybee Hooper (eds.), Syllables and Segments, 3-22. Amsterdam: North Holland.
10. Berg, Thomas 1988 Die Abbildung des Sprachproduktionsprozesses in einem Aktivationsflußmodell:Untersuchungen an deutschen und englischen Versprechern. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
11. Berg, Thomas 1996 The modality-specificity of linguistic representations: Evidence from slips of the tongue and the pen. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 671-697.
12. Berg, Thomas 1998 Linguistic Structure and Change. An Explanation from Language Processing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. Berg, Thomas 1999 A Structural Account of Phonological Paraphasias. (Cognitive Linguistics:Explorations, Applications, Research 1.) Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Universität Hamburg/Department of Linguistics, Rice University, Houston, TX.: Arbeiten aus dem Forschungskolloquium Kognitive Linguistik.
14. Berg, Thomas and Ulrich Schade 1992 The role of inhibition in a spreading-activation model of language production, Volume 1, The psycholinguistic perspective. Journal of Psycholinguists Research 21: 405-34.
15. Bertinetto, Pier Marco 1989 Reflections on the dichotomy «stress» vs. «syllable-timing». Revue de phonetique appliquee 91-92-93: 99-130.
16. Blumstein, Sheila E. 1978 Segment structure and the syllable in aphasia. In: Alan Bell and Joan Bybee Hooper (eds.), Syllables and Segments, 189-200. Amsterdam: North Holland.
17. Blumstein, Sheila E. 1995 The neurobiology of the sound structure of language. In: Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, 915-929. Cambridge, MA.:MIT Press.
18. Boersma, Paul 1998 Functional Phonology: Formalizing the Interactions between Articulatory and Perceptual Drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
19. Bolinger, Dwight L. 1965 Pitch accent and sentence rhythm. In: Dwight L. Bolinger (ed.), Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order, 139-180. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
20. Bolinger, Dwight L. 1980 A not impartial review of a not unimpeachable theory: Some new adventures of ungrammaticality. In: Roger W. Shuy and Anna Shnukal (eds.), Language Use and the Uses of Language, 53-67. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
21. Burnley, David 1983 A Guide to Chaucer's Language. London: Macmillan.
22. Busse, Ulrich 2000 The function of linguistic variation in the Shakespeare corpus: A study of the morphosyntactic variability of the address pronouns and their sociohistorical and pragmatic implications. Habilitation thesis, University of Osnabrück.
23. Bybee, Joan 1985 Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24. Cassidy, Frederic G. and Joan Houston Hall 1991 Dictionary of American Regional English, Volume II, D-E. Cambridge, MA./London, UK: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
25. Chomsky, Noam 1964 Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
26. Chomsky, Noam 1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA./London, UK: MIT Press.
27. Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle 1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
28. Cooper, William E. and Jeanne Paccia-Cooper 1980 Syntax and Speech. Cambridge, MA./London: Harvard University Press.
29. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth 1986 An Introduction to English Prosody. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
30. Dell, Gary S. and Padraig G. O'Seaghdha 1994 Inhibition in Interactive Activation Models of Linguistic Selection and Sequencing. In: Dale Dagenbach and Thomas H. Carr (eds.), Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory, and Language, 409-453. San Diego:Academic Press.
31. Dell, Gary S. and Peter A. Reich 1981 Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 611-629.
32. Dobson, Eric J. 1968 English Pronunciation 1500-1700, Volume 2, Phonology. Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Dobson, Eric J. 1972 The English Text of the Ancrene Riwle, Edited from Β.M. Cotton Ms. Cleopatra C.vl. London: Oxford University Press.
34. Fijn van Draat, Pieter 1967 Rhythm in English Prose. (Anglistische Forschungen 29.) Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Carl Winter. [1910]
35. Fijn van Draat, Pieter 1912a Rhythm in English prose: The adjective. Anglia 36: 1-56.
36. Fijn van Draat, Pieter 1912b Rhythm in English prose: The pronoun./The preposition. Anglia 36: 493-538.
37. Francis, W. Nelson and Henry KuCera 1982 Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
38. Franz, Wilhelm 1986 Die Sprache Shakespeares in Vers und Prosa, unter Berücksichtigung des Amerikanischen entwicklungsgeschichtlich dargestellt. Fourth, revised and augmented edition. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. [1939].
39. Gimson, Alfred Charles 1994 Gimson's Pronunciation of English. Fifth edition, revised by Alan Cruttenden. London: Edward Arnold.
40. Guy, Gregory R. 1997 Violable is variable: Optimality Theory and linguistic variation. Language Variation and Change 9: 333-347.
41. Haspelmath, Martin 1999 Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18: 180-205.
42. Hayes, Bruce 1984 The phonology of rhythm in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 33-74.
43. Hayes, Bruce 1985 A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules. New York/London: Garland.
44. Hayes, Bruce 1995 Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
45. Hudson, Richard 1997 Inherent variability and linguistic theory. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 73-108.
46. Ingram, David 1978 The role of the syllable in phonological development. In: Alan Bell and Joan Bybee Hooper (eds.), Syllables and Segments, 147-155. Amsterdam: North Holland.
47. Ito, Junko and R. Armin Mester 1999 Realignment. In: Rend Kager, Harry van der Hulst and Wim Zonneveld (eds.), The Prosody-Morphology Interface, 188-217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Jespersen, Otto 1965 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part I, Sounds and Spellings. London: George Allen and Unwin. [1909].
49. Jordan, Richard 1974 Handbook of Middle English Grammar: Phonology. Translated and revised by Eugene Joseph Crook. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
50. Kager, René 1989 A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch. Ph.D. dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht.
51. Kager, René 1993 Alternatives to the iambic-trochaic law. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 381-32.
52. Kager, René 1994 Ternary rhythm in alignment theory. Rutgers Optimality Archive ROA-35-1094. Ms., Utrecht University.
53. Kager, René 1995 The metrical theory of word stress. John A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 367-402. Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Kager, René 1996 On affix allomorphy and syllable counting. In: Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology, 155-171. (Studia Grammatica 41.) Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
55. Kager, René and Wim Zonneveld 1999 Introduction. In: Ren6 Kager, Harry van der Hulst and Wim Zonneveld (eds.), The Prosody-Morphology Interface, 1-38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Kaisse, Ellen M. 1985 Connected Speech: The Interaction of Syntax and Phonology. Orlando, FL./London, UK: Academic Press.
57. Koester, John and Steven A. Siegelbaum 2000 Propagated signaling: The action potential. In: Eric R. Kandel, James H. Schwartz and Thomas M. Jessell (eds.), Principles of Neural Science, Chapter 9, 150-170. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58. Ladefoged, Peter 1982 A Course in Phonetics. Second Edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
59. Lamb, Sidney M. 1999 Pathways of the Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis of Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
60. Langendoen, D. Terence 1982 On a class of not ungrammatical constructions. Journal of Linguistics 18: 107-112.
61. Langendoen, D. Terence and Thomas G. Bever 1973 Can a not unhappy person be called a not sad one? In: Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 392-409. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
62. Lass, Roger 1996 Glottal stop and linking [h] in South African English: With a note on two antique connections. In: Juhani Klemola, Merja Kytö and Matti Rissanen (eds.), Speech Past and Present: Studies in English Dialectology in Memory of Ossi Ihalainen, 130-151. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
63. Liberman, Mark and Alan Prince 1977 On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 249-336.
64. Lutz, Angelika 1991 Phonotaktisch gesteuerte Konsonantenveränderungen in der Geschichte des Englischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
65. MacKay, Donald G. 1970 Phoneme repetition in the structure of languages. Language and Speech 13: 199-213.
66. MacKay, Donald G. 1986 Self-inhibition and the disruptive effects of internal and external feedback in skilled behavior. In: Herbert Heuer and Christoph Fromm (eds.), Generation and Modulation of Action Patterns, 174-186. Berlin: Springer.
67. MacKay, Donald G. 1987 The Organization of Perception and Action: A Theory for Language and Other Cognitive Skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.
68. Markus, Manfred 1994 From stress-timing to syllable-timing: Changes in the prosodic system of Late Middle English and Early Modern English. In: Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 187-203. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
69. Martin, James G. 1972 Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. Psychological Review 79: 487-509.
70. McCarthy, John J. and Alan S. Prince 1993 Prosodic morphology I. Constraint interaction and satisfaction. (RuCCS TR-3.) Technical Reports of the Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Unpublished manuscript. New Brunswick, NJ.
71. McClelland, James L. 1987 The case for interactionism in language processing. In: Max Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading, 3-36. London/Hillsdale, MI.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
72. McClelland, James L. and David E. Rumelhart 1981 An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, Part 1, An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88: 375-407.
73. Menn, Lise 1978 Phonological units in beginning speech. In: Alan Bell and Joan Bybee Hooper (eds.), Syllables and Segments, 157-171. Amsterdam: North Holland.
74. Minkova, Donka 2000 Syllable ONSET in the history of English. In: Ricardo Bermudez-Otero, David Denison, Richard M. Hogg and Chris B. Cully (eds.), Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 495-540. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
75. Minkova, Donka and Robert P. Stockwell 1997 Chaucerian phonemics: Evidence and interpretation. In: Raymond Hickey and Stanislaw Puppel (eds.), Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, Volume I, Language History, 29-57. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
76. Nagy, Naomi and Bill Reynolds 1995 Accounting for variable word-final deletion within Optimality Theory. In: Jennifer Arnold, Renóe Blake, Brad Davidson, Scott Schwenter and Julie Solomon (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis, 151-160. (Selected Papers from NWAV 23 at Stanford.) Stanford, CA.: CSLI Publications.
77. Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel 1989 On clashes and lapses. Phonology 6: 69-116.
78. OED 2 on CD-ROM 1994 Version 1.13. Oxford: Oxford University Press/Rotterdam: AND Software B.V.
79. Pike, Kenneth Lee 1945 The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [Reprint 1972].
80. Plag, Ingo 1999 Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. (Topics in English Linguistics 28.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
81. Previte, Joseph 1983 Human Physiology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
82. Prince, Alan S. and Paul Smolensky 1993 Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. (RuCCS TR-2.) Technical Reports of the Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Unpublished manuscript. New Brunswick, NJ. Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Arnold M. Zwicky 1988 The syntax-phonology interface. In: Frederick J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics:The Cambridge Survey, Volume I, Linguistic Theory: Foundations, 255-280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik 1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London, New York: Longman.
84. Raffelsiefen, Renate 1996 Gaps in word formation. In: Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology, 194-209. (Studia Grammatica 41.) Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
85. Rohdenburg, Günter and Julia Schlüter 2000 Determinanten grammatischer Variation im Früh- und Spätneuenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 25: 444-496.
86. Schendl, Herbert 1997 Morphological variation and change in Early Modern English: my/mine, thy/thine. In: Raymond Hickey and Stanislaw Puppel (eds.), Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, Volume I, Language History, 179-191. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
87. Schlüter, Julia 2001 Why worser is better: The double comparative in 16th to 17th century English. Language Variation and Change 13: 193-208.
88. Schlüter, Julia 2002 Das Prinzip der Rhythmischen Alternation in der englischen Syntax: Empirische Fakten und theoretische Implikationen. In: Reinhard Rapp (ed.), Sprachwissenschaft auf dem Weg in das dritte Jahrtausend: Akten des 34. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Germersheim 1999, Part I, Text, Bedeutung, Kommunikation, 197-205. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.
89. Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984 Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA./London, UK: MIT Press.
90. Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 2001 Phonological weight in sentence grammar: Reexamining Heavy Noun Phrase Shift. Paper held at the workshop Prosody in Processing, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, 5-6 July 2001.
91. Steriade, Donca 1995 Underspecification and markedness. In: John Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 114-174. Cambridge, MA./Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
92. Vachek, Josef 1964 On peripheral phonemes of Modern English. Brno Studies in English 4: 7 -109.
93. Vennemann, Theo 1972 Rule inversion. Lingua 29: 209-242.
94. Vennemann, Theo 1988 Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change: With Special Reference to German, Germanic, Italian and Latin. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
95. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1969 Phonological constraints in syntactic descriptions. Papers in Linguistics 1: 411-463.
96. Zwicky, Arnold M. and Geoffrey K. Pullum 1986 The principle of phonology-free syntax: Introductory remarks. Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 32: 63-91.