Network Analysis of Multimodal, Multiscale Coordination in Dyadic Problem Solving

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 2735-2740

  Paxton, Alexandra ^a   Abney, Drew H ^a   Kello, Christopher T ^a   Dale, Rick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

communication; complexity matching; convergence; dyadic interaction; interpersonal synchrony; networks

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

COMPLEXITY MATCHING; CONVERGENCE; DYADIC INTERACTION; INTERPERSONAL SYNCHRONY; MATCHINGS; MULTI-MODAL; NETWORK; NETWORK STRENGTH; PROBLEM-SOLVING; RECENT TRENDS;

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS);

EID: 85065678627     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Abney, D.H., Paxton, A., Kello, C.T., & Dale, R. (under revision). Complexity matching in dyadic interaction.
2. Allan, D.W. (1966). Statistics of atomic frequency standards. Proceedings of the IEEE, 54(2), 221-230.
3. Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1482-1493.
4. Clark, H. H (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.
5. Fusaroli, R., Abney, D.H., Bahrami, B., Kello, C.T., & Tylén, K. (2013). Conversation, coupling, and complexity: Matching scaling laws predicts performance in a joint decision task. Poster presented at the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Berlin, Germany.
6. Fusaroli, R., Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., Frith, C., & Tylén, K. (2012). Coming to terms quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychological Science, 23(8), 931-939.
7. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (2005). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96-99.
8. Helm, J. L., Sbarra, D., & Ferrer, E. (2012). Assessing cross-partner associations in physiological responses via coupled oscillator models. Emotion, 12(4), 748.
9. Keith, T. Z. (2005). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston: Pearson Education.
10. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36, 1404-1426.
11. Marmelat, V. & Delignières, D. (2012). Strong anticipation: complexity matching in interpersonal coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 222, 137-148.
12. Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2382.
13. Paxton, A., & Dale, R. (2013a). Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 329-343.
14. Paxton, A., & Dale, R. (2013b). Multimodal networks for interpersonal interaction and conversational contexts. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
15. Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8-11.
16. Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2010). Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(32), 14425-14430.
17. Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 693-695.
18. Wujec, T. (2010, February). Tom Wujec: Build a tower, build a team [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/tom_wujec_build_a_tower.html