How innovative knowledge assets and firm transparency affect sustainability-friendly practices

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 229, Issue , 2019, Pages 32-43

  Wu, Weiwei ^a   Liu, Yexin ^a   Zhang, Qi ^a   Yu, Bo ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Firm transparency; Innovative knowledge assets; Sustainability friendly practices

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; TRANSPARENCY;

CORPORATE-SUSTAINABILITY; FAST GROWTHS; GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; KNOWLEDGE ASSETS; RESOURCE CONSUMPTION;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85065507076     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Abreu, M.C.S., How to define an environmental policy to improve corporate sustainability in developing countries. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 18 (2009), 542–556 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.625.
2. Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Hurtado-Torres, N.E., Aragón-Correa, J.A., Does international experience help firms to be green? A knowledge-based view of how international experience and organisational learning influence proactive environmental strategies. Int. Bus. Rev. 21 (2012), 847–861 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.09.009.
3. Ahi, P., Searcy, C., A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 52 (2013), 329–341 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018.
4. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G., Reno, R.R., Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. 1991, Sage https://doi.org/10.2307/2583960.
5. Ameer, R., Othman, R., Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: a study based on the top global corporations. J. Bus. Ethics 108 (2012), 61–79 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y.
6. Amores-Salvadó, J., Martín-de Castro, G., Navas-López, J.E., Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance. J. Clean. Prod. 83 (2014), 356–365 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.059.
7. Annunziata, E., Pucci, T., Frey, M., et al. The role of organizational capabilities in attaining corporate sustainability practices and economic performance: evidence from Italian wine industry. J. Clean. Prod. 171 (2018), 1300–1311 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.035.
8. Bai, C., Sarkis, J., Dou, Y., Corporate sustainability development in China: review and analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 115 (2015), 5–40 https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2014-0258.
9. Ball, C., Burt, G., De Vries, F., et al. How environmental protection agencies can promote eco-innovation: the prospect of voluntary reciprocal legitimacy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 129 (2018), 242–253 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.05.003.
10. Baraibar-Diez, E., Odriozola, M.D., Fernández Sánchez, J.L., A survey of transparency: an intrinsic aspect of business strategy. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 26 (2017), 480–489 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1931.
11. Barney, J.B., Ketchen, D.J. Jr., Wright, M., The future of resource-based theory: revitalization or decline?. J. Manag. 37 (2011), 1299–1315 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310391805.
12. Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., et al. Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. J. Bus. Ethics 152 (2018), 613–626 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3285-5.
13. Bernstein, E.S., Making transparency transparent: the evolution of observation in management theory. Acad. Manag. Ann. 11 (2017), 217–266 https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0076.
14. Blum-Kusterer, M., Hussain, S.S., Innovation and corporate sustainability: an investigation into the process of change in the pharmaceuticals industry. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 10 (2001), 300–316 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.300.
15. Bond, A.J., Viegas, C.V., Coelho, C.C.S.R., et al. Informal knowledge processes: the underpinning for sustainability outcomes in EIA?. J. Clean. Prod. 18 (2010), 6–13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.002.
16. Brammer, S., Millington, A., Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strat. Manag. J. 29 (2008), 1325–1343 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.714.
17. Bushman, R.M., Piotroski, J.D., Smith, A.J., What determines corporate transparency?. J. Account. Res. 42 (2004), 207–252 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00136.x.
18. Chakrabarty, S., Wang, L., The long-term sustenance of sustainability practices in MNCs: a dynamic capabilities perspective of the role of R&D and internationalization. J. Bus. Ethics 110 (2012), 205–217 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1422-3.
19. Chen, S., Bu, M., Wu, S., et al. How does TMT attention to innovation of Chinese firms influence firm innovation activities? A study on the moderating role of corporate governance. J. Bus. Res. 68 (2015), 1127–1135 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.002.
20. Chen, X.H., Yi, N., Zhang, L., et al. Does institutional pressure foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from China's top 100 companies. J. Clean. Prod. 188 (2018), 304–311 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.257.
21. Choi, S.B., Lee, S.H., Williams, C., Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: evidence from China. Res. Pol. 40 (2011), 441–452 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.004.
22. Choi, S.B., Williams, C., The impact of innovation intensity, scope, and spillovers on sales growth in Chinese firms. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 31 (2014), 25–46 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9329-1.
23. Chuang, S.P., Huang, S.J., The effect of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental performance and business competitiveness: the mediation of green information technology capital. J. Bus. Ethics 150 (2018), 991–1009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3167-x.
24. Chung, H., Judge, W.Q., Li, Y.H., Voluntary disclosure, excess executive compensation, and firm value. J. Corp. Financ. 32 (2015), 64–90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.04.001.
25. Collins, E., Roper, J., Lawrence, S., Sustainability practices: trends in New Zealand businesses. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 19 (2010), 479–494 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.653.
26. Crane, B., Revisiting who, when, and why stakeholders matter: trust and stakeholder connectedness. Bus. Soc., 2018, 10.1177/0007650318756983 (in press).
27. Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Garcia-Sanchez, I.M., Martinez Ferrero, J., How are corporate disclosures related to the cost of capital? The fundamental role of information asymmetry. Manag. Decis. 54 (2016), 1669–1701 https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2015-0454.
28. Das Neves, J.C., Vaccaro, A., Corporate transparency: a perspective from Thomas Aquinas' summa theologiae. J. Bus. Ethics 113 (2013), 639–648 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1682-6.
29. Dawkins, C.E., Fraas, J.W., An exploratory analysis of corporate social responsibility and disclosure. Bus. Soc. 52 (2013), 245–281 https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650308324047.
30. De Silva, M., Howells, J., Meyer, M., Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: knowledge-based practices and internal value creation. Res. Pol. 47 (2018), 70–87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.011.
31. Doyle, E., McGovern, D., McCarthy, S., et al. Compliance-innovation: a quality-based route to sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 210 (2019), 266–275 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.307.
32. Elsbach, K.D., Stigliani, I., Design thinking and organizational culture: a review and framework for future research. J. Manag. 44 (2018), 2274–2306 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317744252.
33. Ernst, H., Lichtenthaler, U., Vogt, C., Retracted: the impact of accumulating and reactivating technological experience on R&D alliance performance. J. Manag. Stud. 48 (2011), 1194–1216 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00994.x.
34. Ferraresi, A.A., Quandt, C.O., Dos Santos, S.A., et al. Knowledge management and strategic orientation: leveraging innovativeness and performance. J. Knowl. Manag. 16 (2012), 688–701 https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262754.
35. Firth, M., Wang, K., Wong, S.M.L., Corporate transparency and the impact of investor sentiment on stock prices. Manag. Sci. 61 (2014), 1630–1647 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1911.
36. Flammer, C., Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: the environmental awareness of investors. Acad. Manag. J. 56 (2013), 758–781 https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0744.
37. Fonseca, A., How credible are mining corporations' sustainability reports? A critical analysis of external assurance under the requirements of the international council on mining and metals. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 17 (2010), 355–370 https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.230.
38. Gaa, J.C., Corporate governance and the responsibility of the board of directors for strategic financial reporting. J. Bus. Ethics 90 (2009), 179–197 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0381-9.
39. Ginesti, G., Caldarelli, A., Zampella, A., Exploring the impact of intellectual capital on company reputation and performance. J. Intellect. Cap. 19 (2018), 915–934 https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2018-0012.
40. Gold, S., Seuring, S., Beske, P., Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 17 (2010), 230–245 https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.207.
41. Håkanson, L., The firm as an epistemic community: the knowledge-based view revisited. Ind. Corp. Chang. 19 (2010), 1801–1828 https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq052.
42. Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Bus. Ethics Q. 23 (2013), 97–124 https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20132314.
43. Hashmi, M.A., Damanhouri, A., Rana, D., Evaluation of sustainability practices in the United States and large corporations. J. Bus. Ethics 127 (2015), 673–681 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2056-4.
44. Hassan, A., Ibrahim, E., Corporate environmental information disclosure: factors influencing companies' success in attaining environmental awards. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 19 (2012), 32–46 https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.278.
45. He, J., Wang, H.C., Innovative knowledge assets and economic performance: the asymmetric roles of incentives and monitoring. Acad. Manag. J. 52 (2009), 919–938 https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44633414.
46. Heimstädt, M., Openwashing: a decoupling perspective on organizational transparency. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 125 (2017), 77–86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.037.
47. Hofmann, K.H., Theyel, G., Wood, C.H., Identifying firm capabilities as drivers of environmental management and sustainability practices-evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 21 (2012), 530–545 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.739.
48. Hörisch, J., Freeman, R.E., Schaltegger, S., Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organ. Environ. 27 (2014), 328–346 https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614535786.
49. Hörisch, J., Johnson, M.P., Schaltegger, S., Implementation of sustainability management and company size: a knowledge-based view. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 24 (2015), 765–779 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1844.
50. Johannsdottir, L., Mcinerney, C., Developing and using a Five C framework for implementing environmental sustainability strategies: a case study of Nordic insurers. J. Clean. Prod. 183 (2018), 1252–1264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.007.
51. Johnson, M., Redlbacher, F., Schaltegger, S., Stakeholder engagement for corporate sustainability: a comparative analysis of B2C and B2B companies. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 25 (2018), 1–14 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2238.
52. Johnson, M.P., Knowledge acquisition and development in sustainability-oriented small and medium-sized enterprises: exploring the practices, capabilities and cooperation. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 3769–3781 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.087.
53. Kassinis, G., Vafeas, N., Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Acad. Manag. J. 49 (2006), 145–159 https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785799.
54. Kim, Y., Park, M.S., Wier, B., Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? Account. Rev. 87 (2012), 761–796 https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2013.845031.
55. Kuo, L., Yeh, C.C., Yu, H.C., Disclosure of corporate social responsibility and environmental management: evidence from China. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 19 (2012), 273–287 https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.274.
56. Law, K.M.Y., Gunasekaran, A., Sustainability development in high-tech manufacturing firms in Hong Kong: motivators and readiness. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 137 (2012), 116–125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.022.
57. Liao, L., Liu, B., Wang, H., Information discovery in share lockups: evidence from the split-share structure reform in China. Financ. Manag. 40 (2011), 1001–1027 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2011.01169.x.
58. Lioui, A., Sharma, Z., Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecol. Econ. 78 (2012), 100–111 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.004.
59. Lourenço, I.C., Branco, M.C., Determinants of corporate sustainability performance in emerging markets: the Brazilian case. J. Clean. Prod. 57 (2013), 134–141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.013.
60. Lozano, R., A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 22 (2015), 32–44 https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325.
61. Lozano, R., Carpenter, A., Huisingh, D., A review of ‘theories of the firm’ and their contributions to corporate sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 106 (2015), 430–442 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.007.
62. Luo, J., Wan, D., Cai, D., The private benefits of control in Chinese listed firms: do cash flow rights always reduce controlling shareholders' tunneling?. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 29 (2012), 499–518 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9211-y.
63. Luo, X., Du, S., Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation. Market. Lett. 26 (2015), 703–714 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9302-5.
64. Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Gomišček, B., The impact of sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation practices on the organisational performance: a cross-country comparison. J. Clean. Prod. 138 (2016), 158–169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.132.
65. Masocha, R., Fatoki, O., The impact of coercive pressures on sustainability practices of small businesses in South Africa. Sustainability 10 (2018), 3032–3046 https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093032.
66. Mills, A.M., Smith, T.A., Knowledge management and organizational performance: a decomposed view. J. Knowl. Manag. 15 (2011), 156–171 https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111108756.
67. Miska, C., Szőcs, I., Schiffinger, M., Culture's effects on corporate sustainability practices: a multi-domain and multi-level view. J. World Bus. 53 (2018), 263–279 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.12.001.
68. Moffat, A., Auer, A., Corporate Environmental Innovation (CEI): a government initiative to support corporate sustainability leadership. J. Clean. Prod. 14 (2006), 589–600 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.010.
69. Montiel, I., Delgado-Ceballos, J., Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: are we there yet?. Organ. Environ. 27 (2014), 113–139 https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614526413.
70. Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Bus. Soc. 50 (2011), 6–27 https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394323.
71. Pedersen, E.R.G., Gwozdz, W., Hvass, K.K., Exploring the relationship between business model innovation, corporate sustainability, and organisational values within the fashion industry. J. Bus. Ethics 149 (2018), 1267–18284 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3044-7.
72. Perego, P., Kolk, A., Multinationals' accountability on sustainability: the evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. J. Bus. Ethics 110 (2012), 173–190 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1420-5.
73. Przychodzen, J., Przychodzen, W., Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance–evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. J. Clean. Prod. 90 (2015), 253–263 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.034.
74. Qian, C., Wang, H.C., Geng, X., et al. Rent appropriation of knowledge-based assets and firm performance when institutions are weak: a study of Chinese publicly listed firms. Strat. Manag. J. 38 (2017), 892–911 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2522.
75. Rahman, N., Post, C., Measurement issues in environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR): toward a transparent, reliable, and construct valid instrument. J. Bus. Ethics 105 (2012), 307–319 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0967-x.
76. Reverte, C., Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. J. Bus. Ethics 88 (2009), 351–366 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9968-9.
77. Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., Adenso-Diaz, B., Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. J. Oper. Manag. 28 (2010), 163–176 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001.
78. Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M., Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 20 (2011), 222–237 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682.
79. Schnackenberg, A.K., Tomlinson, E.C., Organizational transparency: a new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. J. Manag. 42 (2016), 1784–1810 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202.
80. Searcy, C., Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems: a review and research agenda. J. Bus. Ethics 107 (2012), 239–253 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1038-z.
81. Simeth, M., Cincera, M., Corporate science, innovation, and firm value. Manag. Sci. 62 (2015), 1970–1981 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2220.
82. Vaccaro, A., Sison, A.J.G., Transparency in business: the perspective of Catholic social teaching and the “Caritas in Veritate”. J. Bus. Ethics 100 (2011), 17–27 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1184-3.
83. Wagner, M., How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. J. Environ. Manag. 76 (2005), 105–118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.021.
84. Wang, H.C., Zhao, S., He, J., Increase in takeover protection and firm knowledge accumulation strategy. Strat. Manag. J. 37 (2016), 2393–2412 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2443.
85. Weber, O., Environmental, social and governance reporting in China. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 23 (2014), 303–317 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1785.
86. Wei, Z., Shen, H., Zhou, K.Z., et al. How does environmental corporate social responsibility matter in a dysfunctional institutional environment? Evidence from China. J. Bus. Ethics 140 (2017), 209–223 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2704-3.
87. Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., Appuhami, R., Environmental innovation strategy and organizational performance: enabling and controlling uses of management control systems. J. Bus. Ethics 151 (2018), 1139–1160 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3259-7.
88. Windolph, S.E., Harms, D., Schaltegger, S., Motivations for corporate sustainability management: contrasting survey results and implementation. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 21 (2014), 272–285 https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1337.
89. Wolf, J., The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. J. Bus. Ethics 119 (2014), 317–328 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1603-0.
90. Wu, W.W., Liu, Y.X., Chin, T., et al. Will green CSR enhance innovation? A perspective of public visibility and firm transparency. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (2018), 268–282 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020268.
91. Yeh, Y.M.C., Chen, H.W., Wu, M.C., Can information transparency improve earnings quality attributes? Evidence from an enhanced disclosure regime in Taiwan. Emerg. Mark. Finance Trade 50 (2014), 237–253 https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X500414.
92. Yu, E.P., Guo, C.Q., Luu, B.V., Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 27 (2018), 987–1004 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2047.
93. Yu, Y., Umashankar, N., Rao, V.R., Choosing the right target: relative preferences for resource similarity and complementarity in acquisition choice. Strat. Manag. J. 37 (2016), 1808–1825 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2416.
94. Zaman, A., Rousseeuw, P.J., Orhan, M., Econometric applications of high-breakdown robust regression techniques. Econ. Lett. 71 (2001), 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00404-3.
95. Zhao, M., Tan, J., Park, S.H., From voids to sophistication: institutional environment and MNC CSR crisis in emerging markets. J. Bus. Ethics 122 (2014), 655–674 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1751-x.