The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-47

  Bernard, Robert M ^a   Brauer, Aaron ^a   Abrami, Philip C ^a   Surkes, Mike ^a  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065352872     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0158791042000212440     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abrami, PC, and Bures, EM. (1996). Computer-supported collaborative learning and distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2): 37-42.
2. Abrami PC, Cholmsky P, Gordon R, (2001) Statistical analysis for the social sciences: An interactive approach Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon (includes CD-ROM)
3. Bernard, RM, and Amundsen, CL. (1989). Antecedents to dropout in distance education: Does one model fit all?. Journal of Distance Education, 4(2): 25-46.
4. Bernard RM, Lou Y, Abrami PC, Wozney L, Borokhovski E, Wallet PA, et al. (2003, October) How does distance education compare to classroom instruction? A meta—analysis of the empirical literature Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Anaheim, CA (final results)
5. Bernard, RM, and Naidu, S. (1992). Concept mapping, post-questioning and feedback: A distance education field experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1): 48-60.
6. Bernt, FL, and Bugbee, AC. (1993). Study practices and attitudes related to academic success in a distance learning programme. Distance Education, 14(1): 97-112.
7. Bures, E, Abrami, PC, and Amundsen, C. (2000). Student motivation to learn via computer-conferencing. Research in Higher Education, 41(5): 593-621.
8. Bures, E, Amundsen, C, and Abrami, PC. (2002). Motivation to learn via computer conferencing: Exploring how task-specific motivation and CC expectations are related to student acceptance of learning via CC. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(3): 249-264.
9. Campbell D, Stanley J, (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research New York: Houghton Mifflin
10. Coggins, CC. (1988). Preferred learning styles and their impact on completion of external degree programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 2(1): 25-37.
11. Fulford, CP, and Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3): 8-21.
12. Garrison, DR, Anderson, T, and Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1): 7-23.
13. Hawkes, M. (2001). Variables of interest in exploring the reflective outcomes of network-based communication. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3): 299-315.
14. Kember D, (1995) Open learning courses for adults: A model of student progress Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications
15. Lou Y, Dedic H, Rosenfield S, (2003) Feedback model and successful e-learning In S. Naidu (Ed.) Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practice (pp. 249-260) London and Sterling, VA: Kogan Page
16. McKnight, CB. (2001). Supporting critical thinking in interactive learning environments. Computers in the Schools, 17(3-4): 17-32.
17. McVay M, (2001) How to be a successful distance education student: Learning on the Internet New York, NY: Prentice Hall
18. Moore MG, Thompson MM, (1990) The effects of distance learning: A summary of the literature [Research Monograph]. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University
19. Morgan, C, and Tam, M. (1999). Unraveling the complexities of distance education student attrition. Distance Education, 20t(1): 96-108.
20. Phipps R, Merisotis J, (1999) What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy
21. Russell TL, (1999) The no significant difference phenomenon Chapel Hill, NC: Office of Instructional Telecommunications, North Carolina State University
22. Smith E, (1999) Learning to learn online Retrieved July 24, 2003, from http://www.csu.edu.au
23. Smith, PJ, Murphy, L, and Mahoney, E. (2003). Towards identifying factors underlying readiness for online learning: An exploratory study. Distance Education, 24(1): 57-67.
24. Sweet, R. (1986). Student dropout in distance education: An application of Tinto's model. Distance Education, 7(2): 201-213.
25. Tabachnik BS, Fidell LS, (1996) Using multivariate statistics New York: HarperCollins
26. Taylor JC, (2001, April) Fifth generation distance education Keynote address delivered at the ICDE 20th World Conference, Dusseldorf, Germany, April 1-5. Retrieved September 8, 2002, from http://www.usq.edu.au/users/taylorj/conferences.html
27. Winkelmann, CL. (1995). Electronic literacy, critical pedagogy, and collaboration: A case for cyborg writing. Computers and the Humanities, 29(6): 431-448.
28. Woodley, A, de Lange, P, and Tanewski, G. (2001). Student progress in distance education: Kember's model re-visited. Open Learning, 16(2): 113-131.