Data fusion with international large scale assessments: a case study using the OECD PISA and TALIS surveys

Large-Scale Assessments in Education

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Kaplan, David ^a   McCarty, Alyn Turner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Data Fusion; Data Fusion Method; Level Validity; Miss Data Problem; Regression Imputation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065133821     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21960739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2196-0739-1-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ashton P, Webb N: Making a Difference: Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement. Monogram, Longman, White Plains, New York; 1986.
2. D’Orazio M: Statmatch: Statistical matching [Computer software manual]. 2011.
3. D’Orazio M, Di Zio M, Scanu M: Statistical matching: theory and practice. New York: Wiley; 2006.
4. Efron B: Bootstrap methods: another look at the jacknife. The Annals of Statistics 1979, 7: 1–26. 10.1214/aos/1176344552
5. Enders CK: Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford; 2010.
6. Geman S, Geman D: Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1984, 6: 721–741.
7. Honaker J, King G: What to do about missing values in time‐series cross‐section data. American Journal of Political Science 2010, 54: 561–581. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00447.x
8. Honaker J, King G, Blackwell M: Amelia II: a program for missing data [Computer software manual]. 2010.
9. Kaplan D: The impact of BIB spiraling‐induced missing data patterns on goodness‐of‐fit tests in factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 1995, 20: 69–82.
10. Kaplan D, Depaoli S: Bayesian statistical methods. In Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods. Edited by: Little TD. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013:407–437.
11. Koller‐Meinfelder F: BaBooN: Bayesian bootstrap predictive mean matching – multiple and single imputation for discrete data [Computer software manual]. 2011.
12. Little RJA, Rubin DB: Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd. ed.). New York: Wiley; 2002.
13. OECD: Creating effective teaching and learning results: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD; 2009.
14. OECD: Pisa 2009 results: executive summary. Paris: OECD; 2010a.
15. OECD: Pisa 2009 results: Learning to learn – student engagement, strategies and practices (Vol. 3). Paris: OECD; 2010b.
16. R Development Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna Austria. 2010.
17. Rässler S: Statistical matching: a frequentist theory, practical applications, and alternative Bayesian approaches. New York: Springer; 2002.
18. Reiter JP: Bayesian finite population imputation for data fusion. Statistica Sinica 2012, 22: 795–811.
19. Ross JA: The Antecedents and Consequences of Teacher Efficacy. In Advances in Research on Teaching. Edited by: Brophy J, Brophy J. Greenwich, Connecticut; 1998.
20. Rubin DB: Inference and missing data. Biometrika 1976, 63: 581–592. 10.1093/biomet/63.3.581
21. Rubin, D B: The Bayesian bootstrap. The Annals of Statistics 1981, 9: 130–134. 10.1214/aos/1176345338
22. Rubin, D B: Statistical matching using file concatenation with adjusted weights and multiple imputation. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1986, 4: 87–95.
23. Rubin, D B: Multiple imputation in nonresponse surveys. Hoboken: Wiley; 1987.
24. Schafer JL: Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1997.
25. Tanner MH, Wong WA: The calculation of posterior distributions by PISA/TALIS Link 34 data augmentation (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association 1987, 82: 528–550. 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478458
26. van Buuren S, Groothuis‐Oudshoorn K: Multivariate imputation by chained equations, version. 2010, 2: 3.
27. van Buuren S: Flexible imputation of missing data. New York: Chapman & Hall; 2012.
28. Van de Werfhorst H, Mijs JM: Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: a comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 2010, 36: 407–428. 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102538