Assessing the association between blood loss and postoperative hemoglobin after cesarean delivery: A prospective study of 4 blood loss measurement modalities

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 128, Issue 5, 2019, Pages 926-932

  Fedoruk, Kelly ^a   Seligman, Katherine M ^b   Carvalho, Brendan ^a   Butwick, Alexander J ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGIST; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GRAVIMETRY; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL BLOOD; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OBSTETRICIAN; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTOMETRY; PLACENTA PREVIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRIPLET PREGNANCY; UTERINE ATONY; ADVERSE EVENT; ANESTHESIOLOGY; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; INTRAOPERATIVE MONITORING; OBSTETRICS; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGY; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBINOMETRY; HEMOGLOBINS; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; OBSTETRICS; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 85064991920     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: 15267598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003449     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, et al. Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2005;119:1-8.
2. Corwin EJ, Murray-Kolb LE, Beard JL. Low hemoglobin level is a risk factor for postpartum depression. J Nutr. 2003;133:4139-4142.
3. Lee KA, Zaffke ME. Longitudinal changes in fatigue and energy during pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1999;28:183-191.
4. Beard JL, Hendricks MK, Perez EM, et al. Maternal iron deficiency anemia affects postpartum emotions and cognition. J Nutr. 2005;135:267-272.
5. Butwick AJ, Walsh EM, Kuzniewicz M, Li SX, Escobar GJ. Patterns and predictors of severe postpartum anemia after cesarean section. Transfusion. 2017;57:36-44.
6. Hancock A, Weeks AD, Lavender DT. Is accurate and reliable blood loss estimation the crucial step' in early detection of postpartum haemorrhage: an integrative review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:230.
7. Toledo P, McCarthy RJ, Hewlett BJ, Fitzgerald PC, Wong CA. The accuracy of blood loss estimation after simulated vaginal delivery. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1736-1740.
8. Patel A, Goudar SS, Geller SE, et al. Drape estimation vs visual assessment for estimating postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;93:220-224.
9. Yoong W, Karavolos S, Damodaram M, et al. Observer accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimation of blood loss in obstetrics: how accurate and consistent are health-care professionals? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281:207-213.
10. Lilley G, Burkett-St-Laurent D, Precious E, et al. Measurement of blood loss during postpartum haemorrhage. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;24:8-14.
11. Konig G, Holmes AA, Garcia R, et al. In vitro evaluation of a novel system for monitoring surgical hemoglobin loss. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:595-600.
12. Holmes AA, Konig G, Ting V, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel system for monitoring surgical hemoglobin loss. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:588-594.
13. Konig G, Waters JH, Hsieh E, et al. In vitro evaluation of a novel image processing device to estimate surgical blood loss in suction canisters. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:621-628.
14. Butwick A, Hilton G, Carvalho B. Non-invasive haemoglobin measurement in patients undergoing elective caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:271-277.
15. Sharareh B, Woolwine S, Satish S, Abraham P, Schwarzkopf R. Real time intraoperative monitoring of blood loss with a novel tablet application. Open Orthop J. 2015;9:422-426.
16. Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belfort MA. Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:519.e1-519.e7.
17. Williams EJ. The comparison of regression variables. J R Stat Soc Series B Methodol. 1959;21:396-399.
18. Zou GY. Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychol Methods. 2007;12:399-413.
19. Diedenhofen B, Musch J. Cocor: a comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121945.
20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
21. Prabhu M, Bateman BT. Postpartum anemia: missed opportunities for prevention and recognition. Transfusion. 2017;57:3-5.
22. Main EK, Goffman D, Scavone BM, et al; National Partnership for Maternal Safety; Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. National Partnership for Maternal Safety: consensus bundle on obstetric hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:155-162.
23. California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. Obstetric Hemorrhage Toolkit: Improving Health Care Response to Obstetric Hemorrhage. Available at: https://www.cmqcc.org/ob_hemorrhage/ob_hemorrhage_compendium_of_best_practices. Accessed March 16, 2018.
24. Doctorvaladan SV, Jelks AT, Hsieh EW, Thurer RL, Zakowski MI, Lagrew DC. Accuracy of blood loss measurement during cesarean delivery. AJP Rep. 2017;7:e93-e100.
25. Rubenstein AF, Zamudio S, Al-Khan A, et al. Clinical experience with the implementation of accurate measurement of blood loss during cesarean delivery: influences on hemorrhage recognition and allogeneic transfusion. Am J Perinatol. 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
26. Gharoro EP, Enabudoso EJ. Relationship between visually estimated blood loss at delivery and postpartum change in haematocrit. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:517-520.
27. Ueland K. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. VII. Intrapartum blood volume changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;126:671-677.
28. Richter C, Huch A, Huch R. Erythropoiesis in the postpartum period. J Perinat Med. 1995;23:51-59.