Comparison of ammonia and do aeration control strategies to optimize energy and performance at low capital cost: A case study

WEFTEC 2012 - 85th Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference

Volumn 4, Issue , 2012, Pages 2430-2444

  Poole, Amanda L ^a   Neighbors, Jason ^b   Green, David J ^c   Baert, Sue E ^b   Sosnowski, Christopher T ^c   Wold, Derek J ^a  

^a Baxter and Woodman Inc   (United States)

^b Wheaton Sanitary District   (United States)

^c B and W Control Systems Integration   (United States)

Author keywords

Activated sludge; Aeration; Energy efficiency; Feed forward control; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; AMMONIA; BACTERIA; BLOWERS; COSTS; DISSOLVED OXYGEN; DYNAMIC LOADS; ELECTRIC POWER UTILIZATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; INVESTMENTS; PROBES; PURCHASING; REAL TIME CONTROL; RECLAMATION; RIVERS; SEWAGE TANKS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER AERATION; WATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEMS; AMMONIA OXIDIZING BACTERIA; FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES; INFLUENT WASTEWATERS; MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY; REDUCING ENERGY CONSUMPTION; TREATMENT EFFICIENCY;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 85064862329     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2175/193864712811726167     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (1)

1. U.S. EPA Water Environment Energy Conservation Task Force. September 2010. “Energy Conservation in Wastewater Treatment”. Accessed online July 2, 2012 at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/upload/Evaluation-of-Energy-ConservationMeasures-for-Wastewater-Treatment-Facilities.pdf.