Victoria's Kennett government: Its impact on urban and regional planning: Counting the cost of deregulation: Where to, in planning, after Kennett?

Urban Policy and Research

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 367-372

  Buxton, Michael ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Development control; Professional practice; Statutory schemes; Town planning; Victoria

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064798548     PISSN: 08111146     EISSN: 14767244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08111140108727884     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. ALP. 1999. Planning for the Future: Labor's Policy for Planning, Melbourne: Australian Labor Party.
2. Bannister, N., and Glossop, J., 1997. ‘Editorial’. Planning News, 23 (8)
3. DPD. 1993. Minister for Planning's Projects Steering Committee: Committee Recommendations and Project Team Report (Perrott Committee report), Melbourne: Department of Planning and Development.
4. Gibson, H., 1999. Final Report: New Format Planning Schemes, Melbourne: Planning Panels Victoria.
5. Maclellan, R., 13 Aug. 1993a. Planning a better future for Victorians: New directions for development and economic growth 13 Aug., Melbourne unpublished speech.
6. 1993b. Planning a Better Future for Victorians: New Directions for Development and Economic Growth, Victoria: Department of Planning and Development.
7. Stoker, G., and Young, S., 1993. Cities in the 1990s, London: Longman.
8. Thornley, A., 1993. Urban Planning Under Thatcherism: The Challenge of the Market, London: Routledge.
9. Thwaites, J., 1999. State Planning Agenda: A Sensible Balance, Melbourne: Victorian Government.
10. Tract Consultants and Swinburne Centre for Housing and Planning. 1993. Review of Residential Zones, vol. 1, Melbourne: Department of Health, Housing and Community Services (Commonwealth) and Department of Planning and Development (Victoria).
11. Walters, I., 1997. ‘The planning reforms’. Planning News, 23 (2)