Multi-objective optimization using response surface methodology and exergy analysis of a novel integrated biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and high-temperature sodium heat pipe system

Applied Thermal Engineering

Volumn 156, Issue , 2019, Pages 627-639

  Mojaver, Parisa ^a   Khalilarya, Shahram ^a   Chitsaz, Ata ^a  

^a URMIA UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Co generation system; Exergy efficiency; Multi objective optimization; Response surface methodology; Solid oxide fuel cell

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); BIOMASS; CURRENT DENSITY; EFFICIENCY; EXERGY; FUEL CELLS; HEAT PIPES; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SODIUM; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

BIOMASS GASIFICATION; COGENERATION SYSTEMS; EXERGY DESTRUCTIONS; EXERGY EFFICIENCIES; INLET TEMPERATURE; MODEL VERIFICATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SODIUM HEAT PIPES;

SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELLS (SOFC);

EID: 85064738125     PISSN: 13594311     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.04.104     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Nicoletti, G., Arcuri, N., Nicoletti, G., Bruno, R., A technical and environmental comparison between hydrogen and some fossil fuels. Energy Convers. Manage. 89 (2015), 205–213.
2. Demirbaş, A., Global renewable energy resources. Energy Sources 28:8 (2006), 779–792.
3. Bridgwater, T., Biomass for energy. J. Sci. Food Agric. 86:12 (2006), 1755–1768.
4. Field, C.B., Campbell, J.E., Lobell, D.B., Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:2 (2008), 65–72.
5. Dasappa, S., Paul, P.J., Mukunda, H.S., Rajan, N.K.S., Sridhar, G., Sridhar, H.V., Biomass gasification technology-a route to meet energy needs. Curr. Sci.-Bangalore 87 (2004), 908–916.
6. Gambarotta, A., Morini, M., Zubani, A., A non-stoichiometric equilibrium model for the simulation of the biomass gasification process. Appl. Energy, 2017, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.135.
7. O'hayre, R., Cha, S.W., Prinz, F.B., Colella, W., Fuel Cell Fundamentals. 2016, John Wiley & Sons, 207–246.
8. Sharaf, O.Z., Orhan, M.F., An overview of fuel cell technology: Fundamentals and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 32 (2014), 810–853.
9. Lee, T.S., Chung, J.N., Chen, Y.C., Design and optimization of a combined fuel reforming and solid oxide fuel cell system with anode off-gas recycling. Energy Convers. Manage. 52:10 (2011), 3214–3226.
10. Zohuri, B., Heat Pipe Design and Technology. 2011, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 117–157.
11. Sayyahi, M., Mamourian, M., Ghadiri, M., Experimental Investigation of the influence of nanofluid on the heat performance of pulsating heat pipe. Modares Mech. Eng. 16:13 (2016), 162–165.
12. Ranjbar, F., Chitsaz, A., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Khalilarya, S., Rosen, M.A., Energy and exergy assessments of a novel trigeneration system based on a solid oxide fuel cell. Energy Convers. Manage. 87 (2014), 318–327.
13. Zhang, H., Kong, W., Dong, F., Xu, H., Chen, B., Ni, M., Application of cascading thermoelectric generator and cooler for waste heat recovery from solid oxide fuel cells. Energy Convers. Manage. 148 (2017), 1382–1390.
14. Bakalis, D.P., Stamatis, A.G., Full and part load exergetic analysis of a hybrid micro gas turbine fuel cell system based on existing components. Energy Convers. Manage. 64 (2012), 213–221.
15. Chitsaz, A., Mehr, A.S., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Exergoeconomic analysis of a trigeneration system driven by a solid oxide fuel cell. Energy Convers. Manage. 106 (2015), 921–931.
16. Gholamian, E., Zare, V., Mousavi, S.M., Integration of biomass gasification with a solid oxide fuel cell in a combined cooling, heating and power system: a thermodynamic and environmental analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41:44 (2016), 20396–20406.
17. Gadsbøll, R.Ø., Thomsen, J., Bang-Møller, C., Ahrenfeldt, J., Henriksen, U.B., Solid oxide fuel cells powered by biomass gasification for high efficiency power generation. Energy 131 (2017), 198–206.
18. Borji, M., Atashkari, K., Ghorbani, S., Nariman-Zadeh, N., Model-based evaluation of an integrated autothermal biomass gasification and solid oxide fuel cell combined heat and power system. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engineers, Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 231:4 (2017), 672–694.
19. Bang-Møller, C., Rokni, M., Thermodynamic performance study of biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid systems. Energy Convers. Manage. 51:11 (2010), 2330–2339.
20. Fryda, L., Panopoulos, K.D., Karl, J., Kakaras, E., Exergetic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell and biomass gasification integration with heat pipes. Energy 33:2 (2008), 292–299.
21. Ozcan, H., Dincer, I., Performance evaluation of an SOFC based trigeneration system using various gaseous fuels from biomass gasification. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40:24 (2015), 7798–7807.
22. ReVelle, J.B., Design of experiments. Manufacturing Handbook of Best Practices, 2016, CRC Press, 74–93.
23. Gatti, C., Design of experiments. Design of Experiments for Reinforcement Learning, 2015, Springer, Cham, 53–66.
24. Esfe, M.H., Hajmohammad, H., Moradi, R., Arani, A.A.A., Multi-objective optimization of cost and thermal performance of double walled carbon nanotubes/water nanofluids by NSGA-II using response surface method. Appl. Therm. Eng. 112 (2017), 1648–1657.
25. Esfe, M.H., Mahian, O., Hajmohammad, M.H., Wongwises, S., Design of a heat exchanger working with organic nanofluids using multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm and response surface method. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 119 (2018), 922–930.
26. Sun, X., Kim, S., Yang, S.D., Kim, H.S., Yoon, J.Y., Multi-objective optimization of a Stairmand cyclone separator using response surface methodology and computational fluid dynamics. Powder Technol. 320 (2017), 51–65.
27. Sun, L., Zhang, C.L., Evaluation of elliptical finned-tube heat exchanger performance using CFD and response surface methodology. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 75 (2014), 45–53.
28. Caliandro, P., Tock, L., Ensinas, A.V., Marechal, F., Thermo-economic optimization of a solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine system fuelled with gasified lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Convers. Manage. 85 (2014), 764–773.
29. Fryda, L., Panopoulos, K.D., Kakaras, E., Integrated CHP with autothermal biomass gasification and SOFC–MGT. Energy Convers. Manage. 49:2 (2008), 281–290.
30. Kotas, T.J., The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis. 2013, Elsevier.
31. Dincer, I., Rosen, M.A., Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development. 2012, Newnes.
32. Steward, F.R., Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical and Metallurgical Processes. 1988, Hemisphere Publ. Corp, New York.
33. Loha, C., Chatterjee, P.K., Chattopadhyay, H., Performance of fluidized bed steam gasification of biomass–modeling and experiment. Energy Convers. Manage. 52:3 (2011), 1583–1588.
34. Loha, C., Chattopadhyay, H., Chatterjee, P.K., Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk. Energy 36:7 (2011), 4063–4071.
35. Salami, N., Skála, Z., Use of the steam as gasifying agent in fluidized bed gasifier. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q 29:1 (2015), 13–18.
36. Shahbaz, M., Inayat, A., Patrick, D.O., Ammar, M., The influence of catalysts in biomass steam gasification and catalytic potential of coal bottom ash in biomass steam gasification: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 73 (2017), 468–476.
37. Mojaver, P., Khalilarya, S., Chitsaz, A., Performance assessment of a combined heat and power system: A novel integrated biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and high-temperature sodium heat pipe system part I: Thermodynamic analysis. Energy Convers. Manage. 171 (2018), 287–297.
38. Styrylska, T., Szargut, J., Approximate determination of fuel exergy (Approximate determination of chemical exergy of fuels with known absolute entropy). Brennstoff-Wärme-Kraft 16 (1964), 589–596.
39. Datta, A., Ganguly, R., Sarkar, L., Energy and exergy analyses of an externally fired gas turbine (EFGT)cycle integrated with biomass gasifier for distributed power generation. Energy 35:1 (2010), 341–350.
40. Zhang, X., Li, H., Liu, L., Bai, C., Wang, S., Song, Q., Zeng, J., Liu, X., Zhang, G., Exergetic and exergoeconomic assessment of a novel CHP system integrating biomass partial gasification with ground source heat pump. Energy Convers. Manage. 156 (2018), 666–679.
41. Ptasinski, K.J., Prins, M.J., Pierik, A., Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification. Energy 32:4 (2007), 568–574.
42. Khani, L., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Chitsaz, A., Rosen, M.A., Energy and exergoeconomic evaluation of a new power/cooling cogeneration system based on a solid oxide fuel cell. Energy 94 (2016), 64–77.
43. Chitsaz, A., Hosseinpour, J., Assadi, M., Effect of recycling on the thermodynamic and thermoeconomic performances of SOFC based on trigeneration systems; A comparative study. Energy 124 (2017), 613–624.
44. Colpan, C.O., Hamdullahpur, F., Dincer, I., Yoo, Y., Effect of gasification agent on the performance of solid oxide fuel cell and biomass gasification systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35:10 (2010), 5001–5009.
45. Campanari, S., Iora, P., Definition and sensitivity analysis of a finite volume SOFC model for a tubular cell geometry. J. Power Sources 132:1 (2004), 113–126.
46. Akkaya, A.V., Electrochemical model for performance analysis of a tubular SOFC. Int. J. Energy Res. 31:1 (2007), 79–98.
47. Chan, S.H., Khor, K.A., Xia, Z.T., A complete polarization model of a solid oxide fuel cell and its sensitivity to the change of cell component thickness. J. Power Sources 93:1 (2001), 130–140.
48. Yari, M., Mehr, A.S., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Santarelli, M., A comparative study of two SOFC based cogeneration systems fed by municipal solid waste by means of either the gasifier or digester. Energy 114 (2016), 586–602.
49. Sadeghi, M., Chitsaz, A., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Rosen, M.A., Thermoeconomic optimization using an evolutionary algorithm of a trigeneration system driven by a solid oxide fuel cell. Energy 89 (2015), 191–204.
50. Betiku, E., Taiwo, A.E., Modeling and optimization of bioethanol production from breadfruit starch hydrolyzate vis-à-vis response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Renew. Energy 74 (2015), 87–94.
51. Mostafaei, M., Javadikia, H., Naderloo, L., Modeling the effects of ultrasound power and reactor dimension on the biodiesel production yield: comparison of prediction abilities between response surface methodology (RSM)and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Energy 115 (2016), 626–636.