Cross-linguistic trends in the perception of place of articulation in stop consonants: A comparison between Hungarian and French

Approaches to Phonological Complexity

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 241-266

  Serniclaes, Willy ^a   Geng, Christian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b Centre for General Linguistics Typology and Universals Research (ZAS)   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064607340     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Abry, C. 2003 [b]-[d]-[g] as a universal triangle as acoustically optimal as [i]-[a]-[u]. In Solé, M.-J., Rescasens, D. & Romero, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, pp. 727-730
2. Aslin, R.N. 1989 Discrimination of frequency transitions by human infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86:582-590
3. Burnham, D., Tyler, M., & Horlyck, S. 2002 Periods of speech perception development and their vestiges in adulthood. In Burmeister, Piske & Rohde (Eds.). An integrated View of Language Development (Papers in Honor of Henning Wode). Trier: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag. pp. 281-300
4. Carré, R., & Mrayati, M. 1991 Vowel-vowel trajectories and region modeling. Journal of Phonetics, 19:433-443
5. Carré, R., Serniclaes, W., & Marsico, E. 2003 Formant transition duration versus prevoicing duration in voiced stop identification. In Solé, M.-J., Rescasens, D. & Romero, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, pp. 415-418
6. Dart, S.N. 1998 Comparing french and English coronal consonant articulation. Journal of Phonetics, 26:71-94
7. Dorman, M.F., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Raphaël, L.S. 1977 Stop consonant recognition: Release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, context-dependent cues. Perception and Psychophysics, 22:109-122
8. Eimas, P.D. 1974 Auditory and linguistic processing of cues for place of articulation by infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 16:513-521
9. Geng, C., Mády, K., Bogliotti, C., Messaoud-Galusi, S., Medina,V., & Serniclaes, W. 2005 Do palatal consonants correspond to the fourth category in the perceptual F2-F3 space? In: V.Hazan & P. Iverson (Eds.). Proceedings of the ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception, London, June 15-17 2005, pp. 219-222
10. Geng, C., & Mooshammer, C. 2004 The Hungarian palatal stop: phonological considerations and phonetic data. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 37: 221-243
11. Gerken, L. & Aslin, R.N. 2005 Thirty years of research on infant speech perception: The legacy of Peter W. Jusczyk. Language Learning and Development, 1:5-21
12. Guenther, F., & Bohland, J. 2002 Learning sound categories: A neural model and supporting experiments. Acoustical Science & Technology, 23:213-220
13. Harnad, S. 1987 Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition. New-York: Cambridge University Press
14. Hoonhorst, I., Colin, C., Deltenre, P., Radeau, M., & Serniclaes, W. 2006 Emergence of a language specific boundary in perilinguistic infants. Early Language Development and Disorders, Latsis Colloqium of the University of Geneva, Program and Abstracts, 45
15. Jakobson, R., Fant, G., & Halle, M. 1952 Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press
16. Jusczyk, P. W. 1997 The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Bradford Books
17. Keating, P. 1988 Palatals as complex segments: X-ray evidence. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 69:77-91
18. Kuhl, P.K. 2004 Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews, 5:831-843
19. Kuhl, P.K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T. Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. 2006 Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9:F13-F21
20. Ladefoged, P. and Maddieson, I. 1996 The sounds of the world's languages. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell
21. Lasky, R.E., Syrdal-Lasky, A., & Klein, R.E. 1975 VOT discrimination by four to six and a half month-old infants from Spanish environment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20:215-225
22. Liberman, A.M. 1998 Three questions for a theory of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103:3024
23. Liljencrants, J., & Lindblom, B. 1972 Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrast. Language, 48:839-862
24. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S. 1964 A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384-422
25. Maddieson, I. 2003 Phonological typology in geographical perspective. In Solé, M.-J., Rescasens, D. & Romero, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, pp. 719-722
26. Masin, S.C. 1993 Some philosophical observations on perceptual science. In S. Masin (ed.), Foundations of perceptual theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 43-73
27. Massaro, D. W. 1987 Categorical Partition: A fuzzy logical models of categorization behavior. In S. Harnad, (ed.), Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition. New-York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254-286
28. Ohala, J. J. 1983 The origin of sound patterns in vocal-tract constraints. In: P. F. MacNeilage (ed.), The Production of Speech. New York: Springer. pp. 189-216
29. Pegg, J.E., & Werker, J.F. 1997 Adult and infant perception of two English phones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102:3742-3753
30. Repp, B.H. 1979 Relative amplitude of aspiration noise as a voicing cue for syllableinitial stop consonants. Language and Speech, 22:173-189
31. Repp, B.H. 1982 Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92:81-110
32. Serniclaes, W. 2000 La perception de la parole. In P. Escudier & J.L. Schwartz (ed.), La parole: Des modèles cognitifs aux machines communicantes. Paris: Hermes, Science Publications. pp. 159-190
33. Serniclaes, W., & Carré, R. 2002 Contextual effects in the perception of place of articulation: a rotational hypothesis. In J.L.H. Hansen & B. Pellom (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pp. 1673-1676
34. Serniclaes, W., Bogliotti, C. & Carré, R. 2003 Perception of consonant place of articulation: phonological categories meet natural boundaries. In In Solé, M.-J., Rescasens, D. & Romero, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, pp. 391-394
35. Siptár, P., & Torkenczy, M. 2000 The phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Univ. Press
36. Snowdown, C. T. 1987 A naturalistic view of categorical perception. In S. Harnad, (ed.), Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition. New-York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 332-354
37. Sussman, H. M., Fruchter, D., Hilbert, J., & Sirosh, J. 1998 Linear correlates in the speech signal: The orderly output constraints. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21:241-259
38. Vihman, M.V. 1996 Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Cambridge (MA): Blackwell
39. Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. 1984a Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7:49-63
40. Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. 1984b Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75:1866-1878