Effectiveness of decision AIDS for smoking cessation in adults: A quantitative systematic review

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2018, Pages 1791-1822

  Moyo, Fernea ^a,b   Archibald, Ella ^a,b   Slyer, Jason T ^a,b  

^a PACE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b A Joanna Briggs Institute Center for Excellence   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision aid; Shared decision making; Smoking; Smoking cessation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CINAHL; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COCHRANE LIBRARY; EMBASE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MEDLINE; PSYCINFO; REVIEW; SHARED DECISION MAKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOBACCO; ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; SMOKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO SMOKING;

EID: 85064111907     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22024433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003698     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. World Health Organization. WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco smoking. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press [Internet]; 2015; [cited 2017 April 30]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/156262/1/ 9789241564922-eng.pdf?ua=1.
2. U.S. National Cancer Institute and World Health Organization. The Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control. National Cancer Institute Tobacco Control Monograph 21. NIH Publication No. 16-CA-8029A. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; and Geneva, CH: World Health Organization [Internet]; 2016 [cited 2017 April 30]. Available from: https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/ tcrb/monographs/21/docs/m21-complete.pdf.
3. Siu AL. Behavioral and pharmacotherapy interventions for tobacco smoking cessation in adults, including pregnant women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2015;163(8):622-34.
4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Smoking: Harm reduction [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 April 15]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph45?unlid= 102175397201742211157.
5. World Health Organization. WHO European strategy for smoking cessation policy. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe [Internet]; 2004; [cited 2017 April 30]. Available from: www.euro.who.int/-data/ assets/pdf-file/0017/68111/E80056.pdf.
6. World Health Organization. The role of health professionals in tobacco control. Geneva: WHO Press [Internet]; 2005; [cited 2017 April 30]. Available from: www.who.int/tobacco/ resources/publications/wntd/2005/bookletfinal-20april.pdf.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tobacco Industry Marketing [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 April 15]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data-statistics/fact- sheets/tobacco-industry/marketing/.
8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update Rockville,MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [Internet]; 2008; [cited 2017 April 15]. Available from: https://www. ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/guidelinesrecommendations/ tobacco/index.html.
9. Thurgood SL, McNeill A, Clark-Carter D, Brose LS. A systematic review of smoking cessation interventions for adults in substance abuse treatment or recovery. Nicotine Tob Res 2016;18(5):993-1001.
10. Mills EJ, Wu P, Lockhart I, Thorlund K, Puhan M, Ebbert JO. Comparisons of high-dose and combination nicotine replacement therapy, varenicline, and bupropion for smoking cessation: A systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis. Ann Med 2012;44(6):588-97.
11. Truglio-Londrigan M, Slyer JT, Singleton JK, Worral PS. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care setting. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2014;12(5): 121-94.
12. Kaltoft M, Cunich M, Salkeld G, Dowie J. Assessing decision quality in patient-centered care requires a preferencesensitive measure. J Health Serv Res Policy 2014;19(2): 110-7.
13. Stacey D, LégaréF, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001431.
14. Mistler LA, Brunette MF, Ferron JC, Ziedonis DM. Shared decision making and behavioral support interventions for people with severe mental illness and tobacco dependence. J Dual Diagn 2012;8(2):99-103.
15. Warner DO, LeBlanc A, Kadimpati S, Vickers KS, Shi Y, Montori VM. Decision aid for cigarette smokers scheduled for elective surgery. Anesthesiology 2015;123(1):18-28.
16. Elwyn G, O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Newcombe RG, Politi M, Durand MA, et al. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the international patient decision aid standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS ONE 2009;4(3):e4705.
17. Weymiller A, Montori V, Jones L, Gafni A, Guyatt G, Bryant S, et al. Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions; statin choice randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2007;167(10):1076-82.
18. Cupertino PA, Richter K, Cox LS, Garrett S, Ramirez R, Mujica F, Ellerbeck EF. Feasibility of a Spanish/English computerized decision aid to facilitate smoking cessation efforts in underserved communities. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2010;21(2):504-17.
19. Perestelo-Perez L, Rivero-Santana A, Sanchez-Afonso JA, Perez-Ramos J, Castellano-Fuentes CL, Sepucha K, et al. Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with depression: A randomized controlled trial. Health Expect 2017;20(5): 1096-105.
20. Miller DP, Spangler JG, Case LD, Goff DC, Singh S, Pignone MP. Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: A randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population. Am J Prev Med 2011;40(6): 608-15.
21. Ilic D, Jammal W, Chiarelli P, Gardiner RA, Hughes S, Stefanovic D, Chambers SK. Assessing the effectiveness of decision aids for decision making in prostate cancer testing: A systematic review. Psychooncology 2015;24(10):1303-15.
22. Zdenkowski N, Butow P, Tesson S, Boyle F. A systematic review of decision aids for patients making a decision about treatment for early breast cancer. Breast 2016;26:31-45.
23. Knops A, Legemate D, Goossens A, Bossuyt P, Ubbink D. Decision aids for patients facing a surgical treatment decision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2013;257(5):860-6.
24. Willemsen MC, Wiebing M, Van Emst MA, Zeeman G. Helping smokers to decide on the use of efficacious smoking cessation methods: A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid. Addiction 2006;101(3):441-9.
25. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999;49(5): 651-61.
26. Friedrichs A, Spies M, Härter M, Buchholz A. Patient preferences and shared decision making in the treatment of substance use disorders: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 2016;11(1):e0145817.
27. Moyo F, Archibald E, Slyer JT. The effectiveness of decision aids on smoking cessation in adult patients: A systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2017;15(12):2881-99.
28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National biomonitoring program [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 June 28]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/biomonitoring/Cotinine- BiomonitoringSummary.html.
29. Connor A. Validation of decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 1995;15(1):25-30.
30. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung W, Grol R. The OPTION scale: Measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect 2005;8(1):34-42.
31. The Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual: 2017 edition. Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017; Available from https://reviewersmanual. joannabriggs.org/.
32. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: The PRISMA Statement. PLos Med 2009;6(7):e1000097.
33. McDonnell, KK. A Decision Aid to Improve Smoking Abstinence and HRQL for Families Facing Cancer. [PhD dissertation]. University of Virginia; 2013.
34. McDonnell KK, Bullock LF, Kozower BD, Hollen PJ, Heath J, Rovnyak V. A decision aid to improve smoking abstinence for families facing cancer.Oncol Nurs Forum 2014; 41(6):649-58.
35. Lee JE, Shin DW, Suh B, Chun S, Nam YS, Cho B. Development and application of culturally appropriate decision aids for smoking cessation in Korea: a pragmatic clustered randomization crossover trial. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016;10:1929-36.
36. Brunette MF, Ferron JC, McHugo GJ, Davis KE, Devitt TS, Wilkness SM, et al. An electronic decision support system to motivate people with severe mental illnesses to quit smoking. Psychiatr Serv 2011;62(4):360-6.
37. Brunette MF, Gunn W, Alvarez H, Finn PC, Geiger P, Ferron JC, et al. A pre-post pilot study of a brief, webbased intervention to engage disadvantaged smokers into cessation treatment. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2015; 10(1):3.
38. Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Stephenson M, Aromataris E. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13(3):196-207.
39. Collins SE, Witkiewitz K, Kirouac M, Marlatt GA. Preventing relapse following smoking cessation. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 2010;4(6):421-8.
40. GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [Software]. McMaster University, 2015 (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc.). Available from gradepro.org.