Shared Decision-Making Framework for Pelvic Examinations in Asymptomatic, Nonpregnant Patients

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2019, Pages 810-814

  Chor, Julie ^a   Stulberg, Debra B ^b   Tillman, Stephanie ^b  

^a THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PELVIC EXAMINATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SHARED DECISION MAKING; ADULT; AGED; ASYMPTOMATIC DISEASE; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; GYNECOLOGY; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SEXUAL HEALTH; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; ASYMPTOMATIC DISEASES; DECISION MAKING, SHARED; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SEXUAL HEALTH; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85063971511     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003166     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. National Center for Health Statistics. National ambulatory medical care survey: 2015 state and national summary tables. Hyattsville (MD): NCHS; 2017.
2. Bloomfield HE, Olson A, Greer N, Cantor A, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, average-risk adult women: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:46–53.
3. American Academy of Family Physicians. Screening pelvic exam. Clinical preventive service recommendation. Available at: https://www.aafp.org/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all/screening-pelvic-exam.html. Retrieved November 1, 2018.
4. Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Pelvic examinations. SGO position statement. Available at: https://www.sgo.org/newsroom/position-statements-2/pelvic-examinations/. Retrieved November 1, 2018.
5. US Preventive Services Task Force; Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Barry MJ, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for gynecologic conditions with pelvic examination: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2017;317:947–53.
6. The utility of and indications for routine pelvic examination. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 754. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132: e174–80.
7. Henderson JT, Harper CC, Gutin S, Saraiya M, Chapman J, Sawaya GF. Routine bimanual pelvic examinations: practices and beliefs of US obstetrician-gynecologists. AJOG 2013;208: 109E1–7.
8. Sawaya GF, Smith-McCune KK, Gregorich SE, Moghadassi M, Kupperman M. Effect of professional society recommendations on women’s desire for a routine pelvic examination. AJOG 2017;217:3388.E1–7.
9. Siegler M. Searching for moral certainty in medicine: a proposal for a new model of the doctor-patient encounter. Bull NY Acad Med 1981;57:56–69.
10. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science Med 1999;49:651–61.
11. Dehlendorf C, Grumbach K, Schmittdiel JA, Steinauer J. Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception 2017;95:452–5.
12. Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JCJM. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns 2015;98:1172–9.