Erratum: Meaningful use of electronic health records: Experiences from the field and future opportunities (JMIR Medical Informatics (2015) 3:3 (e30) DOI: 10.2196/medinform.4457);Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records: Experiences from the Field and Future Opportunities

JMIR Medical Informatics

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Slight, Sarah Patricia ^a,b   Berner, Eta S ^c   Galanter, William ^d   Huff, Stanley ^e,f   Lambert, Bruce L ^g   Lannon, Carole ^h,i   Lehmann, Christoph U ^j   McCourt, Brian J ^k   McNamara, Michael ^l   Menachemi, Nir ^m   Payne, Thomas H ⁿ   Spooner, S Andrew ^o   Schiff, Gordon D ^b,p   Wang, Tracy Y ^k   Akincigil, Ayse ^q   Crystal, Stephen ^q   Fortmann, Stephen P ^r   Vandermeer, Meredith L ^r   Bates, David W ^b,p  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c University of Alabama   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^g NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h James M Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^j VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^l Northwest Permanente   (United States)

^m INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^p HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^q RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^r CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Electronic health records; Health policy; Meaningful use; Medical informatics

Indexed keywords

EID: 85063297717     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22919694     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/medinform.5160     Document Type: Erratum

References (41)

1. HealthIT.gov. 2015. Health IT regulations: Meaningful use regulationsURL:http://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/meaningful-use-regulations [accessed 2015-05-24] [WebCite Cache ID 6Ylk9mfv2].
2. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010 Aug 5;363(6):501-504. [doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006114] [Medline: 20647183].
3. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Request for Comment Regarding the Stage 3 Definition of Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). 2013 Jan 14. URL:http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/hitpc-stage3-rfc-final.pdf [accessed 2015-09-13] [WebCite Cache ID 6bWMjeeEY].
4. regulations.gov. Your voice in federal decision-makingURL:http://www.regulations.gov/[accessed 2015-04-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6XdQbcd1z].
5. EHR Incentive Program. Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Menu Set Measures Measure 6 of 9. 2014 May. Medication reconciliationURL:http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/7-Medication-Reconciliation.pdf [accessed 2015-04-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6XdRfFrnu].
6. Schnipper JL, Hamann C, Ndumele CD, Liang CL, Carty MG, Karson AS, et al. Effect of an electronic medication reconciliation application and process redesign on potential adverse drug events: A cluster-randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2009 Apr 27;169(8):771-780. [doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.51] [Medline: 19398689].
7. Schnipper JL, Liang CL, Hamann C, Karson AS, Palchuk MB, McCarthy PC, et al. Development of a tool within the electronic medical record to facilitate medication reconciliation after hospital discharge. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 May 1;18(3):309-313 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000040] [Medline: 21486889].
8. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Stage 2: Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 1 of 16. 2012 Oct. URL:http://www.cms.gov/site-search/search-results. html?q=Eligible%20Hospital%20and%20Critical%20Access%20Hospital%20Meaningful%20Use%20Core%20Measures%20Measure%201%20of%2016. %20Stage%202 [accessed 2015-04-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6XdSm5XDp].
9. Goss FR, Zhou L, Plasek JM, Broverman C, Robinson G, Middleton B, et al. Evaluating standard terminologies for encoding allergy information. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20(5):969-979 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000816] [Medline: 23396542].
10. Royal College of Physicians. 2010. Allergy services: Still not meeting the unmet needURL:https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/allergy-services-still-not-meeting-the-unmet-need.pdf [accessed 2015-05-24] [WebCite Cache ID 6Yllb4yT1].
11. Gerstle RS, Lehmann CU, American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Clinical Information Technology. Electronic prescribing systems in pediatrics: The rationale and functionality requirements. Pediatrics 2007 Jun;119(6):e1413-e1422. [doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0889] [Medline: 17545368].
12. Hughes RG, Edgerton EA. Reducing pediatric medication errors: Children are especially at risk for medication errors. Am J Nurs 2005 May;105(5):79-80, 82, 85 passim. [Medline: 15867545].
13. Stavroudis TA, Miller MR, Lehmann CU. Medication errors in neonates. Clin Perinatol 2008 Mar;35(1):141-61, ix. [doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2007.11.010] [Medline: 18280880].
14. Kim GR, Lehmann CU, Council on Clinical Information Technology. Pediatric aspects of inpatient health information technology systems. Pediatrics 2008 Dec;122(6):e1287-e1296. [doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2963] [Medline: 19047228].
15. Lowry S, Quinn M, Ramaiah M, Brick D, Patterson E, Zhang J, et al. A Human Factors Guide to Enhance EHR Usability of Critical User Interactions When Supporting Pediatric Patient Care. 2012 Jun. URL:http://www.nist.gov/healthcare/usability/upload/NIST-IR-7865.pdf [accessed 2015-09-13] [WebCite Cache ID 6bWNQboed].
16. KIDS COUNT data center. 2014. Total population by child and adult populationsURL:http://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/99-total-population-by-child-and-adult [accessed 2015-04-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6XdSuHso0].
17. Spooner SA, Council on Clinical Information Technology American Academy of Pediatrics. Special requirements of electronic health record systems in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2007 Mar;119(3):631-637. [doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3527] [Medline: 17332220].
18. Maat B, Au YS, Bollen CW, van Vught AJ, Egberts TC, Rademaker CM. Clinical pharmacy interventions in paediatric electronic prescriptions. Arch Dis Child 2013 Mar;98(3):222-227. [doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302817] [Medline: 23184352].
19. Ginzburg R, Barr WB, Harris M, Munshi S. Effect of a weight-based prescribing method within an electronic health record on prescribing errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009 Nov 15;66(22):2037-2041. [doi: 10.2146/ajhp080331] [Medline: 19890088].
20. Selbst SM, Fein JA, Osterhoudt K, Ho W. Medication errors in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 1999 Feb;15(1):1-4. [Medline: 10069301].
21. Condren M, Studebaker IJ, John BM. Prescribing errors in a pediatric clinic. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2010 Jan;49(1):49-53. [doi: 10.1177/0009922809342459] [Medline: 19643978].
22. Croskerry P, Shapiro M, Campbell S, LeBlanc C, Sinclair D, Wren P, et al. Profiles in patient safety: Medication errors in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2004 Mar;11(3):289-299 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 15001413].
23. Patterson ES, Zhang J, Abbott P, Gibbons MC, Lowry SZ, Quinn MT, et al. Enhancing electronic health record usability in pediatric patient care: A scenario-based approach. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2013 Mar;39(3):129-135. [Medline: 23516763].
24. Johnson KB, Lee CK, Spooner SA, Davison CL, Helmke JS, Weinberg ST. Automated dose-rounding recommendations for pediatric medications. Pediatrics 2011 Aug;128(2):e422-e428 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0760] [Medline: 21788218].
25. Johnson KB, Ho Y, Cala CM, Davison C. Showing your work: Impact of annotating electronic prescriptions with decision support results. J Biomed Inform 2010 Apr;43(2):321-325 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.11.008] [Medline: 19995617].
26. Kirkendall ES, Spooner SA, Logan JR. Evaluating the accuracy of electronic pediatric drug dosing rules. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014 Feb;21(e1):e43-e49 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001793] [Medline: 23813541].
27. Scharnweber C, Lau BD, Mollenkopf N, Thiemann DR, Veltri MA, Lehmann CU. Evaluation of medication dose alerts in pediatric inpatients. Int J Med Inform 2013 Aug;82(8):676-683. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.04.002] [Medline: 23643148].
28. D'Agostino J, Gerdes M, Hoffman C, Manning M, Phalen A, Bernbaum J. Provider use of corrected age during health supervision visits for premature infants. J Pediatr Health Care 2013;27(3):172-179.
29. Zimmer KP, Miller MR, Lee BH, Miller RE, Lehmann CU. Electronic narcotic prescription writer: Use in medical error reduction. J Patient Saf 2008;4(2):98-105.
30. Anoshiravani A, Gaskin GL, Groshek MR, Kuelbs C, Longhurst CA. Special requirements for electronic medical records in adolescent medicine. J Adolesc Health 2012 Nov;51(5):409-414. [doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.08.003] [Medline: 23084160].
31. Britto MT, Tivorsak TL, Slap GB. Adolescents' needs for health care privacy. Pediatrics 2010 Dec;126(6):e1469-e1476 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0389] [Medline: 21098148].
32. National Council for Prescription Drug Programs. 2014. Standards informationURL:http://www.ncpdp.org/Standards [accessed 2015-05-24] [WebCite Cache ID 6YlnxjggO].
33. National Rural Health Association. The future of rural healthURL:http://www.ruralhealthweb.org/index. cfm?objectid=EAB2AE78-3048-651A-FE4CBFB6C083F34F., [WebCite Cache ID 6XdS5vIBh].
34. HealthcareITNews. 2011 Feb 08. ONC awards additonal $12M to 48 RECs for EHR adoptionURL:http://www. ruralhealthweb.org/index.cfm?objectid=EAB2AE78-3048-651A-FE4CBFB6C083F34F., [accessed 2015-05-24] [WebCite Cache ID 6YlmrBrbT].
35. PR Newswire. 2013 Sep 12. HHS awards $5.3 million to boost health IT for rural areasURL:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hhs-awards-53-million-to-boost-health-it-for-rural-areas-223471081.html [accessed 2015-04-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6XdUzXxKY].
36. Agency for Healthcare Research Quality. Appendix B: Getting Ready: A Planning Checklist for Rural and Community Hospitals Considering Implementing Health IT. 2012 Oct. URL:https://healthit.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/page/AppendixB.pdf [accessed 2015-09-13] [WebCite Cache ID 6bWOHGN6q].
37. Enthoven AC. Integrated delivery systems: The cure for fragmentation. Am J Manag Care 2009 Dec;15(10 Suppl):S284-S290 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 20088632].
38. Maeda J, Lee K, Horberg M. Comparative health systems research among Kaiser Permanente and other integrated delivery systems: A systematic literature review. Perm J 2014;2014(3):18.
39. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Federal Health Information Technology Strategic Plan 2011-2015. 2015. URL:http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/utility/final-federal-health-it-strategic-plan-0911. pdf [accessed 2015-05-24] [WebCite Cache ID 6Ylnl5DgR].
40. Slight S, Bates D. A risk-based regulatory framework for health IT: Recommendations of the FDASIA working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014:1-4.
41. California Medical Association. 2015 Jan 23. AMA asks feds to decouple EHR certification from meaningful useURL:http://www.cmanet.org/news/detail/?article=ama-asks-feds-to-decouple-ehr-certification [accessed 2015-05-24] [WebCite Cache ID 6YlnZzcTX].