Articulating uncertainty attribution as part of critical epistemic practice of scientific argumentation

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 1, Issue , 2017, Pages 135-142

  Lee, Hee Sun ^a   Pallant, Amy ^a   Pryputniewicz, Sarah ^a   Lord, Trudi ^a   Liu, Ou Lydia ^b  

^a The Concord Consortium   (United States)

^b EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING;

DATA-SOURCE; DEEP UNCERTAINTIES; HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS; MODEL-BASED OPC; PHENOMENOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY; TESTING THEORIES;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 85063013427     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ben-Haim, Y. (2014). Order and indeterminism: An info-gap perspective. In M. Boumans, G. Hon, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Error and uncertainty in scientific practice: History and philosophy of technoscience (pp. 157-176). London: Routledge.
2. Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93, 26-55.
3. Bogen, J., & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. Philosophical Review, 97, 303-352.
4. Boumans, M., & Hon, G. (2014). Introduction. In M. Boumans, G. Hon, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Error and uncertainty in scientific practice: History and philosophy of technoscience (pp. 1-12). London: Routledge.
5. Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92, 473-493.
6. Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
7. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933.
8. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11(2), 143-157.
9. Kandlikar, M., Risbey, J., & Dessai, S. (2005). Representing and communicating deep uncertainty in climatechange assessments. Comptes Rendus-Geoscience, 337(4), 443-455.
10. Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810-824.
11. Lee, H.-S., Liu, O. L., Pallant, A., Roohr, K. C., Pryputniewicz, S., & Buck, Z. E. (2014). Assessment of uncertainty-infused scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 581-605.
12. McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 153-191.
13. McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203-229.
14. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
15. Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Owens, M. C. (2012). The two faces of scientific argumentation: Applications to global climate change. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 17-38). New York: Springer.
16. Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93, 448-484.
17. Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5-51.
18. Spiegelhalter, D., Pearson, M., & Short, I. (2011). Visualizing uncertainty about the future. Science, 333(6048), 1393-1400.
19. Staley, K. W. (2014). Experimental knowledge in the face of theoretical error. In M. Boumans, G. Hon, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Error and uncertainty in scientific practice: History and philosophy of technoscience (pp. 39-56). London: Routledge.
20. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. New York: Cambridge University Press.