30. Future challenges in event attribution methodologies

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2018, Pages S155-S157

  Stott, Peter A ^c   Christidis, Nikos ^d   Herring, Stephanie C ^a   Hoell, Andrew ^a   Kossin, James P ^a   Schreck, Carl J ^b  

^a NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85062813902     PISSN: 00030007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0285.1     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Brainard, R., and Coauthors, 2018: Ecological impacts of the 2015/16 El Niño in the central equatorial Pacific. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99 (1), S21–S26, doi:10.1175/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0128.1.
2. Hegerl, G. C., O. Hoegh-Guldberg, G. Casassa, M. P. Hoerling, R. S. Kovats, C. Parmesan, D. W. Pierce, and P. A. Stott, 2010: Good practice guidance paper on detection and attribution related to anthropogenic climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Expert Meeting on Detection and Attribution of Anthropogenic Climate Change, T. F. Stocker et al., Eds. IPCC Working Group I Technical Support Unit, Bern, Switzerland, 8 pp. [Available online at https://wg1.ipcc.ch/guidancepaper/IPCC_D&A_GoodPractice GuidancePaper.pdf.]
3. Mann, M. E., E. A. Lloyd, and N. Oreskes, 2017: Assessing climate change impacts on extreme weather events: the case for an alternative (Bayesian) approach. Climatic Change, 144, 131–142, doi:10.1007 /s10584-017-2048-3.
4. Marjanan, S., L. Patten, and J. Thornton, 2017: Acts of God, human influence and litigation. Nat. Geosci., 10, 616–619, doi:10.1038/ngeo3019.
5. Newman, M., A. Wittenberg, L. Cheng, G. P. Compo, and C. A. Smith, 2018: The extreme 2015/16 El Niño, in the context of historical climate variability and change, [in "Explaining Extreme Events of 2016 from a Cliamte Perspective”]. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99 (1), S16–S20,10.1175/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0116.1.
6. Stott, P. A., D. J., Karoly, and F. W. Zwiers, 2017: Is the choice of statistical paradigm critical in extreme event attribution studies? Climatic Change, 144, 143–150, doi:10.1007/s10584-017-2049-2.
7. Vautard, R., A. Colette, E. van Meijgaard, F. Meleux, G. J. van Oldenborgh, F. Otto, I. Tobin, and P. Yiou, 2018: Attribution of wintertime anticyclonic stagnation contributing to air pollution in western Europe [in “Explaining Extreme Events of 2016 from a Climate Perspective”]. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99 (1), S70–S75, doi:10.1175/D-17-0113.1.
8. Webb, R. S., and F. E. Werner, 2018: Explaining extreme ocean conditions impacting living marine resources [in “Explaining Extreme Events of 2016 from a Climate Perspective”]. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99 (1), S7–S10, doi:10.1175/D-17-0265.1.