ACOG Technology Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 14: Modern Genetics in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 132, Issue 3, 2018, Pages E143-E168

  Vora, Neeta L ^a   Ralston, Steven J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT INHERITANCE; AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE INHERITANCE; CODOMINANCE; CONSANGUINITY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DNA SEQUENCING; EPIGENETICS; EXTRACHROMOSOMAL INHERITANCE; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOME IMPRINTING; GYNECOLOGIST; GYNECOLOGY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MENDELIAN INHERITANCE; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS; MONOGENIC DISORDER; MOSAICISM; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; OBSTETRICIAN; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT COUNSELING; PENETRANCE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNOLOGY; TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT; UNIPARENTAL DISOMY; WHOLE EXOME SEQUENCING; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING; WOMEN'S HEALTH; X CHROMOSOME LINKAGE; HEREDITY;

GENETIC PHENOMENA; GENETIC TESTING; GYNECOLOGY; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; OBSTETRICS; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING;

EID: 85061879214     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002831     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17:405–24.
2. Carrier screening for genetic conditions. Committee Opinion No. 691. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:e41–55.
3. Gardner RJ, Sutherland GR, Shaffer LG. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. 4th ed. New York (NY): Oxford; 2012.
4. Chinnery PF. Mitochondrial disorders overview. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, editors. GeneReviewsÒ [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 2014. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/books/NBK1224. Retrieved June 1, 2018.
5. Bennett RL, Motulsky AG, Bittles A, Hudgins L, Uhrich S, Doyle DL, et al. Genetic counseling and screening of consanguineous couples and their offspring: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2002;11:97–119.
6. Yang Y, Xie B, Yan J. Application of next-generation sequencing technology in forensic science. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2014;12:190–7.
7. Cukier HN, Dueker ND, Slifer SH, Lee JM, Whitehead PL, Lalanne E, et al. Exome sequencing of extended families with autism reveals genes shared across neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol Autism 2014;5:1.
8. Drury S, Williams H, Trump N, Boustred C, Lench N, Scott RH, et al. Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic abnormalities. Centre for Translational Genomics. Prenat Diagn 2015;35:1010–7.
9. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Points to consider in the clinical application of genomic sequencing. Policy Statement. Bethesda (MD): ACMG; 2012. Available at: https://www.acmg.net/staticcontent/ppg/clinical_application_of_genomic_sequencing.pdf. Retrieved June 22, 2018.
10. Microarrays and next-generation sequencing technology: the use of advanced genetic diagnostic tools in obstetrics and gynecology. Committee Opinion No. 682. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128: e262–8.