Who are we talking about? Identifying scientific populations online

Springer Proceedings in Complexity

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 237-250

  Birkholz, Julie M ^a   Wang, Shenghui ^b   Groth, Paul ^a   Magliacane, Sara ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b OCLC Research   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85060366403     PISSN: 22138684     EISSN: 22138692     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6880-6_21     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Bar-Ilan, J.: Web of science with the conference proceedings citation indexes: the case of computer science. Scientometrics 83(3), 809–824 (2010)
2. Colazzo, L., Molinari, A., Villa, N.: From e-learning to “co-learning”: the role of virtual communities. In: Kendall, M., Samways, B. (eds.) IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 281, pp. 329–338 (2008)
3. de Solla Price, D.J.: Networks of scientific papers. Science 149, 510–515 (1965)
4. Dunbar, K.: How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In: Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., Vaid, S. (eds.), Conceptual Structures and Processes: Emergence, Discovery and Change, pp. 461–493. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1997)
5. Groth, P., Gurney, T.: Studying scientific discourse on the web using bibliometrics: A chemistry blogging case study. In: Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society OnLine. Raleigh, NC: US, April 26–27th, 2010
6. Gurney, T., Horlings, E., van den Besselaar, P.: Author disambiguation using multi-aspect similarity indicators. Scientometrics, 1–15 (2012)
7. Hampton, K., Sessions-Goulet, L., Rainie, L., Purcell, K.: Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Res. Center (2011)
8. Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (1979)
9. Ley, M.: Dblp-some lessons learned. PVLDB 2(2), 1493–1500 (2009)
10. Lucas, J.W.: Theory-testing, generalization, and the problem of external validity. Socio. Theor 21, 236–253 (2003)
11. Mika, P.: Social networks and the semantic web. In: Web Intelligence, pp. 285–291(2004)
12. Newman, M.E.J.: The structure of scientific collaboration networks. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98, pp. 404–409 (2001)
13. Neylon, C., Wu, S.: Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. PLoS Biol. 7(11: e1000242) (2009)
14. Priem, J., Costello, K.: How and why scholars cite on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, (2010)
15. Priem, J., Costello, K., Dzuba, T.: Prevalence and use of twitter among scholars. In: Metrics 2011: Symposium on Informetric and Scientometric Research. Poster, New Orleans, LA, October 2011
16. Priem, J., Hemminger, B.M.: Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday (7) (2010)
17. Priem, J., Parra, C., Piwowar, H., Groth, P., Waagmeester, A.: Uncovering impacts: a case study in using altmetrics tools. In: Workshop on the Semantic Publishing SePublica 2012 at the 9th Extended Semantic Web Conference, pp. 1–5(2012)
18. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., Neylon, C.: Alt-metrics: A manifesto, (v.1.0). http://altmetrics.org/manifesto, 26 October 2010
19. Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., Su, Z.: Arnetminer: extraction and mining of academic social networks. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’08, pp. 990–998. ACM, New York, NY, (2008)
20. Taraborelli, D.: Readermeter: Crowdsourcing research impact. Academic Productivity, 2010. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from: http://www.academicproductivity.com/2010/readermeter-crowdsourcing-research-impact/
21. Walsh, J.P., Bayma, T.: Computer networks and scientific work. Soc. Stud. Sci. 26, 661–703 (1996)
22. Wellman, B., Gulia, M.: Virtual communities as communities. In: Smith, M.A., Kollock, P. (eds.) Communities in Cyberspace.. Routledge, New York (1999)