A comparison of usability between voting methods

EVT 2006 - 2006 USENIX/ACCURATE Electronic Voting Technology Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Greene, Kristen K ^a   Byrne, Michael D ^a   Everett, Sarah P ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mechanical lever machine; Paper ballots; Usability; Voting

Indexed keywords

USABILITY ENGINEERING; VOTING MACHINES;

COMPLETION TIME; ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEMS; ERROR RATE; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY; PAPER-BASED BALLOT; USABILITY MEASURES; VOTING METHOD; VOTING SYSTEMS;

ELECTRONIC VOTING;

EID: 85060328250     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Brooke, J. (1996) SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester & A. L. McClelland (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. London:Taylor and Francis.
2. Everett, S. P., Byrne, M. D., & Greene, K. K. (2006). Measuring the usability of paper ballots: Efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction. To appear in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3. Industry Usability Reporting Project. (2001). Common industry format for usability test reports (ANSI/INCITS 354-2001).
4. International Committee for Information Technology Standards. ISO 9241-11. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDT)s part 11. Guidance on usability.
5. Laskowski, S. J., Autry, M., Cugini, J., Killam, W., & Yen, J. (2004). Improving the usability and accessibility of voting systems and products. NIST Special Publication 500-256.