Constitutional discourse and its discontents: An essay on the rhetoric of judicial review

The Rhetoric of Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 225-260

  Douglas, Lawrence ^a  

^a AMHERST COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85059259362     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Plato, Gorgias, trans. Walter Hamilton (New York: Penguin Books, 1960), 44.
2. Plato, Gorgias, 38.
3. Aristotle, Rhetoric, trans. W. Rhys Roberts (New York: Modern Library, 1984)
4. Kenneth Burke, A Rhetoric of Motives (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969).
5. When Words Lose Their Meaning: The Constitution and Reconstruction of Language, Character, and Community (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984)
6. Heracles' Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of Law (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985)
7. "Law as Rhetoric, Rhetoric as Law: The Arts of Cultural and Communal Life," University of Chicago Law Review 52 (1985): 684.
8. "Law as Rhetoric," 690.
9. "Law as Rhetoric," 692.
10. James Boyd White, Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).
11. Robert Ferguson, 'The Judicial Opinion as Literary Genre," Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2 (1990): 201.
12. Alexander Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962).
13. Henry Steele Commager, Majority Rule and Minority Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1943)
14. Harry Wellington, Interpreting the Constitution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).
15. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 492 U.S. 490 (1989) (Scalia concurring).
16. Max Weber, "The Types of Legitimate Domination," in Economy and Society, ed. G. Roth, trans. Edward Shils and Max Rheinstein (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978).
17. Jiirgen Habermas, Legitimation Crisis, trans. Thomas McCarthy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1975).
18. "The Supreme Court, 1982 Term—Foreword: Nomos and Narrative," Harvard Law Review 97 (1983): 4.
19. Bickel, Least Dangerous Branch, chap, 1.
20. Ely, "The Wages of Crying Wolf," Yale Law Journal 82 (1973): 920.
21. Steven Winter, "Indeterminacy and Incommensurability in Constitutional Law," California Law Review 78 (1990): 1441.
22. Fred Dallmayr, "Hermeneutics and the Rule of Law," in Legal Hermeneutics: History, Theory, and Practice, ed. Gregory Leyh (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1992), 17-18.
23. Peter Goodrich, Languages of Law (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1990).
24. Robert G. McCloskey, The American Supreme Court (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960), 26-53.
25. James M. O'Fallon, "Marbury," Stanford Law Review 44 (1992): 219.
26. Robert Lowry Clinton, Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1989).
27. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, ed. Max Farrand, 4 vols. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), 1:97-98, 2:298-300.
28. The Federalist Papers, ed. Clinton Rossiter (New York: Mentor, 1961), 464-72.
29. Sylvia Snowiss, Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).
30. James Thayer, "The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law," Harvard Law Review 7 (1893): 129.
31. Snowiss, Judicial Review, 51.
32. Snowiss, Judicial Review, 125.
33. H. Jefferson Powell, "The Original Understanding of Original Intent," Harvard Law Review 98 (1985): 885.
34. Marbury, 176.
35. Marbury, 176-78.
36. Catherine Drinker Bowen, Miracle at Philadelphia (Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1986).
37. Jefferson L, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. A. E. Lipscomb and A. E. Bergh (Washington, D.C.: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association of the United States, 1903), 15:41-42.
38. Marbury 179.
39. E. D. Hirsch, Validity in Interpretation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967)
40. The Aims of Interpretation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976).
41. Elias Canneti, Kafka's Other Trial (New York: Schocken, 1982).
42. Meese's "Address before the D.C. Chapter of the Federalist Society Lawyers Division," in Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader, ed. Sandford Levinson and Steven Mailloux (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1988).
43. "The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding” Boston University Law Review 60 (1980): 204.
44. "The Intentional Fallacy” in The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1954).
45. Walter Benn Michaels, "The Fate of the Constitution," Texas Law Review 61 (1982): 765.
46. Powell, "Original Understanding of Original Intent."
47. The Judiciary Act of 1789, 1 Annals of Congress 50, 964.
48. William W. Van Alstyne, "A Critical Guide to Marbury v. Madison," Duke Law Journal (1969): 1, 32-33.
49. John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980).
50. Bickel, Least Dangerous Branch.
51. Bruce Ackerman, "The Storrs Lectures," Yale Law Journal 93 (1984): 1013, 1025-1030.
52. Richard Posner, Law and Literature: A Misunderstood Relation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988), 245-50.
53. Van Alstyne, "Critical Guide," 30-33.
54. Marbury, 179.
55. Snowiss, Judicial Review, 42.
56. Marbury, 180.
57. Van Alstyne in "Critical Guide,”
58. Bickel, Least Dangerous Branch, 1-33.
59. Robert Bork, "Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems," Indiana Law journal 47 (1971): 1.
60. James F. Simon, The Antagonists (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989), 177.
61. Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986).
62. Adamson, 68.
63. Adamson, 66.
64. Steven Knapp and Walter Benn Michaels, "Intention, Identity, and the Constitution," in Leyh, Legal Hermeneutics.
65. Adamson, 68.
66. Adamson, 69.
67. Thomas Grey, Do We Have an Unwritten Constitution? Stanford Law Review 27 (1975): 703.
68. Robert Cover, "Violence and the Word," Yale Law Journal 95 (1986): 1601.
69. Austin Sarat and Thomas R. Kearns, "Making Peace with Violence: Robert Cover on Law and Legal Theory," in Law's Violence, ed. Sarat and Kearns (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992).
70. J. L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).
71. Cover, "Supreme Court," 33-40.
72. David M. O'Brien, Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 1990).
73. Joseph Goldstein, The Intelligible Constitution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
74. Percival E. Jackson, Dissent in the Supreme Court (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1969).
75. Owen Fiss, "Objectivity and Interpretation," Stanford Law Review 34 (1982): 739.
76. Stanley Fish, Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1992).