Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey

Research Evaluation

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 310-322

  Sile, Linda ^a   Pölönen, Janne ^b   Sivertsen, Gunnar ^c   Guns, Raf ^a   Engels, Tim C E ^a   Arefiev, Pavel ^d   Dušková, Marta ^e   Faurbæk, Lotte ^f   Holl, András ^g   Kulczycki, Emanuel ^h   Macan, Bojan ⁱ   Nelhans, Gustaf ^j   Petr, Michal ^k   Pisk, Marjeta ^l   Soós, Sándor ^g   Stojanovski, Jadranka ^i,m   Stone, Ari ⁿ   Šušol, Jaroslav ^o   Teitelbaum, Ruth ^p  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b Federation of Finnish Learned Societies   (Finland)

^c Research and Education   (Norway)

^d Scientific Electron Library eLIBRARYRU   (Russian Federation)

^e Slovak Centre of Scientific and Technical Information   (Slovakia)

^f Agency for Science and Higher Education   (Denmark)

^g INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^h ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

ⁱ RUDER BO KOVI INSTITUTE   (Croatia)

^j UNIVERSITY OF BORÅS   (Sweden)

^k MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^l ANTON MELIK GEOGRAPHICAL INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^m UNIVERSITY OF ZADAR   (Croatia)

ⁿ Planning and Budgeting Committee   (Israel)

^o Faculty of Natural Sciences   (Slovakia)

^p Henrietta Szold Institute for Research in Behavioral Sciences Israel   (Israel)

more..

Author keywords

database; Europe; research information; social sciences and humanities; SSH

Indexed keywords

EID: 85058699502     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: 14715449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvy016     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arefiev, P. G., Eremenko, G. O., and Gluhov, V. A. (2012) 'Rossijskij Indeks Nauchnogo Citirovanija-Instrument Dlja Analiza Nauki', Bibliosfera, 5: 66-71.
2. Arnold, E. (2011) International Audit of Research, Development & Innovation in the Czech Republic. Final Report. Synthesis Report. p. 57.
3. Brighton: Technopolis Group. accessed 31 Oct 2016.
4. Biesenbender, S., and Hornbostel, S. (2016) 'The Research Core Dataset for the German Science System: Developing Standards for an Integrated Management of Research Information', Scientometrics, 108/1: 401-12.
5. COST Association (2015) Memorandum of Understanding for the implementation of the COST Action 'European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities' (ENRESSH) CA15137. p. 19. Brussels. accessed 15 May 2016.
6. DORA (2012) San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. accessed 16 Jan 2018.
7. Geerts, N. et al. (2016) STI in Flanders: Science, Technology & Innovation Policy & Key Figures-2015. No. D/2016/3241/060. p. 98. Brussels: Department of Economy, Science and Innovation. Flemish Government. accessed 4 Aug 2016.
8. Hicks, D. (2004) 'The Four Literatures of Social Science' in Moed H. F., Glänzel W., and Schmoch U. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, pp. 473-96. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Hicks, D. et al. (2015) 'The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics', Nature, 520: 429-31.
10. Holl, A. et al. (2014) 'MTMT: The Hungarian Scientific Bibliography', Uses of OpenData Within Government for Innovation and Efficiency. Samos, Greece.
11. Kulczycki, E. (2017) 'Assessing Publications through a Bibliometric Indicator: The Case of Comprehensive Evaluation of Scientific Units in Poland', Research Evaluation, 26/1: 41-52.
12. Kulczycki, E. et al. (2018) 'Publication Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Evidence from Eight European Countries', Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2711-0
13. Kungliga biblioteket (2015) SwePub-en nationell tjänst för analys och bibliometri. No. 1.4.1-2015-444. accessed 24 March 2017.
14. Mahieu, B. et al. (2014) Measuring Scientific Performance for Improved Policy Making. Summary of a Study. p. 16. Brussels: European Parliament; Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services. accessed 4 Jun 2017.
15. Martin, B. et al. (2010) Towards a Bibliometric Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities-A European Scoping Project. p. 55. accessed 3 July 2016.
16. Michels, C., and Schmoch, U. (2012) 'The Growth of Science and Database Coverage', Scientometrics, 93/3: 831-46.
17. Ministerstvo školstva Slovenskej republiky (2008) Smernica č. 13/2008-R zo 16. októbra 2008 o bibliografickej registrácii a kategorizácii publikačnej činnosti, umeleckej činnosti a ohlasov. CD-2008-19745/42317-1: 11. accessed 23 Nov 2017.
18. Ministerstvo školstva, vedy, vy´skumu a športu (2012) Vyhláška Ministerstva školstva, vedy, vy´skumu a športu Slovenskej republiky z 18. decembra 2012 o centrálnom registri evidencie publikačnej činnosti a centrálnom registri evidencie umeleckej činnosti, 456/2012. accessed 17 Jan 2018.
19. Ministry of Education and Culture (2015) Publication Data Collection Instructions for Researchers. accessed 2 Feb 2017.
20. Ministry of Higher Education and Science (2017) Guidelines for Registering Research for the Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator. accessed 11 Nov 2017.
21. Moed, H. F. et al. (2009) Options for a Comprehensive Database of Research Outputs in Social Sciences and Humanities. p. 66.
22. Moskaleva, O. et al. (2017) 'Russian Index of Science Citation: Overview and Review' in 16th International Conference on Scientometrics&Informetrics. Conference proceedings. pp. 1076-86. Wuhan: Wuhan University.
23. OECD (2015) Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, the Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing.
24. Puuska, H.-M. et al. (2018) Proof of Concept of a European Database for Social Sciences and Humanities Publications: Description of the VIRTA-ENRESSH Pilot. Helsinki: CSC & ENRESSH. accessed 2 May 2018.
25. RINC (2008) Reglament vkljuchenija nauchnyh zhurnalov v Rossijskij indeks nauchnogo citirovanija (RINC). Unpublished internal document.
26. Seljak, M., and Seljak, T. (2002) 'The Development of the COBISS System and Services in Slovenia', Program, 36/2: 89-98.
27. Sile, L. et al. (2017) European Databases and Repositories for Social Sciences and Humanities Research Output. p. 25. Antwerp: ECOOM & ENRESSH. accessed 9 July 2017.
28. Sivertsen, G. (2016) 'Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model', in Ochsner M., Hug S. E., and Daniel H.-D. (eds) Research Assessment in the Humanities, pp. 79-90. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
29. Solberg, E. (2016) RIO country report 2015: Norway. No. EUR 27858 EN. p. 58. Norway. accessed 26 Sept 2017.
30. Stojanovski, J. (1999) 'Bibliography in the Network Environment: Croatian Scientific Bibliography (CROSBI)' in V. Hljuz-Dobric and D. Kalpic (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, pp. 359-64. Zagreb. The Act on the Support of Research and Development (2002) 130/2002. accessed 22 Nov 2017.
31. Verleysen, F. T., Ghesquière, P., and Engels, T. C. E. (2014) 'The Objectives, Design and Selection Process of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW)'. In: Blockmans, W., Engwall, L., & Weaire, D. (Eds). Bibliometrics: Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance, pp. 115-25. Portland Press: London.
32. Vlaamse Overheid (2012) Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering betreffende de financiering van de Bijzondere Onderzoeksfondsen aan de universiteiten in de Vlaamse Gemeenschap. accessed 12 Nov 2017. Vysshaja attestacionnaja komissija pri Ministerstve obrazovanija i nauki
33. Rossijskoj Federacii (2007) Porjadok registracii jelektronnyh nauchnyh izdanij, publikacii v kotoryh priravnivajutsja k opublikovannym rabotam, otrazhajushhim osnovnye nauchnye rezul'taty dissertacii. accessed 17 Oct 2017.