Post-theories for practice: Challenging the dogmas

Social Work in a Corporate Era: Practices of Power and Resistance

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 31-45

  Parton, Nigel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85058240084     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315242835-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Adam, B., Beck U. and van Loon, J. (eds.) (2000), The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, Sage, London.
2. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London.
3. Clarke, J. (ed.) (1993), A Crisis in Care? Challenges to Social Work, Sage, London.
4. Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S. and McLaughlin, E. (eds.) (2000), New Managerialism, New Welfare?, Sage, London.
5. Department of Health (1998), Modernizing Social Services: Promoting Independence, Improving Protection, Raising Standards, Cm. 4169, The Stationery Office, London.
6. Department of Health (2000), A Quality Strategy for Social Care, The Stationery Office, London.
7. Dingwall, R. and Eekelaar, J. (1988), ‘Families and the state: An historical perspective on the public regulation of private conduct’, Law and Society, Vol. 10(4), pp. 341-361.
8. Dingwall, R., Eekelaar, J. and Murray, T. (1983), The Protection of Children: State Intervention and Family Life. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
9. Donzelot, J. (1980), The Policing of Families: Welfare Versus the State, Hutchinson, London.
10. Finch, J. and Groves, D. (1983), A Labor of Love: Women, Work and Caring, RKP, London.
11. Froggett, L. (2002), Love, Hate and Welfare, Policy Press, Bristol.
12. Glendinning, C., Powell, M. and Rummery, K. (eds.) (2002), Partnerships, New Labor and the Governance of Welfare, Policy Press, Bristol.
13. Haris, J. (2003), The Social Work Business, Routledge, London.
14. Hirst, P. (1981), ‘The genesis of the social’, Politics and Power, Vol. 3, pp. 67-82.
15. Jordan, B. with Jordan, C. (2000), Social Work and the Third Way: Tough Love as Social Policy, Sage, London.
16. Kant, I. (1952), The Critique of Judgment, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. Langan, M. (2002), ‘The Legacy of Radical Social Work’, in R. Adams, L. Dominelli and M. Payne (eds.), Social Work: Themes, Issues and Critical Debates, (Second Edition), Palgrave, Basingstoke.
18. Lash, S. (2000), ‘Risk Culture’, in B. Adam, U. Beck, and J. van Loon (eds.), The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, Sage, London.
19. Lash, S. (2003), ‘Reflexivity as Non-Linearity’, Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 20(2), pp. 49-57.
20. Meagher, G. and Parton, N. (2003), ‘Modernizing social work and the ethics of care’, Social Work and Society, Vol. 1(2), pp. 35-40.
21. Newman, J. (2001), Modernizing Governance: New Labor, Policy and Society, Sage, London.
22. Packwood, A. (2002), ‘Evidence-based policy: Rhetoric and reality’, Social Policy and Society, Vol. 1(3), pp. 267-272.
23. Parton, M. (1994), ‘Problematics of government, (post)modernity and social work’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 24(1), pp. 9-32.
24. Parton, N. (1991), Governing the Family: Child Care, Child Protection and the State, Macmillan/Palgrave, Basingstoke.
25. Parton, N. (1998), ‘Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 28(1), pp. 5-27.
26. Parton, N. (2003), ‘Rethinking professional practice: The contributions of social constructionism and the feminist ‘ethics of care’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 33(1), pp. 1-16.
27. Parton, N. and O’Byme, P. (2000), Constructive Social Work: Towards a New Practice, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
28. Philp, M. (1979), ‘Notes on the form of knowledge in social work’, Sociological Review, Vol. 27(1), pp. 83-111.
29. Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30. Ritzer, G. (1998), The McDonaldization Thesis, Sage, London.
31. Ritzer, G. (2000), The McDonaldization of Society, (New Century Edition), Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
32. Smart, B. (1999), Facing Modernity: Ambivalence, Reflexivity and Morality, Sage, London.
33. Smith, C. (2001), ‘Trust and confidence: Possibilities for social work in high modernity’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 31(2), pp. 287-305.
34. Stenson, K. (1993), ‘Social work discourse and the social work interview’, Economy and Society, Vol. 22(1), pp. 42-76.
35. Stepney, P. (2000), ‘Implications for social workers’, in P. Stepney and D. Ford (eds.), Social Work Models, Methods and Theories, Russell House, Lyme Regis.
36. Taylor-Gooby, P. (1994), ‘Postrnodernism and social policy: A great leap backwards?' Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 23(3), pp. 385-404.
37. Trinder, L. (2000), ‘Evidence-based practice in social work and probation’, in L. Trinder and S. Reynolds (eds.), Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Appraisal, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
38. Wagner, P. (1994), A Sociology of Modernity: Liberty and Discipline, Routledge, London.
39. Webb, S. (2001), ‘Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 31(1), pp. 57-79.
40. Weiss, C.H. (1979), ‘The many meanings of research utilization’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 39, pp. 426-431.
41. Young, K., Ashby, D., Bozaz, A. and Grayson, L. (2002), ‘Social science and the evidencebased policy movement’, Social Policy and Society, Vol. 1(3), pp. 215-224.