Measuring the extent to which Londoners are willing to pay for public art in their city

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 142, Issue , 2019, Pages 301-311

  Tanguy, Marine ^a   Kumar, Vishal ^b  

^a UCL ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Logistic regression; Public art; Smart city; Visual narrative; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; SMART CITY;

BINARY LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS; CONTINGENT VALUATIONS; EXPLANATORY VARIABLES; FINANCIAL SUPPORT; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH; PUBLIC ART; VISUAL NARRATIVE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

LOGISTIC REGRESSION;

ART; CONTINGENT VALUATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMART CITY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ENGLAND; LONDON [ENGLAND]; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 85058233822     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.016     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arts Council, Percent for Art—Report of a Steering Group, London. 1990.
2. Bakhshi, H., Fujiwara, D., Lawton, R., Mourato, S., Dolan, P., Measuring Economic Value in Cultural Institutions. 2015.
3. Buckland, S.T., MacMillan, D.C., Duff, E.I., Hanley, N., Estimating mean willingness to pay from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 48:1 (1999), 109–124.
4. Evans, G., Cultural Planning: An Urban Renaissance?. 2002, Routledge.
5. Evans, G., Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture's contribution to regeneration. Urban Stud. 42:5–6 (2005), 959–983.
6. Evans, G., Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Stud. 46:5–6 (2009), 1003–1040.
7. Ferrell, J., Remapping the city: public identity, cultural space, and social justice. Cultural Criminology: Theories of Crime, 2017, 315.
8. GIA, Public Funding for the Arts: 2013 Update. found at http://www.giarts.org/article/public-funding-arts-2013-update, 2013.
9. Guo, X., Liu, H., Mao, X., Jin, J., Chen, D., Cheng, S., Willingness to pay for renewable electricity: A contingent valuation study in Beijing, China. Energy Policy 68 (2014), 340–347.
10. Hanemann, W.M., Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data: reply. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 71:4 (1989), 1057–1061.
11. Herriges, J.A., Shogren, J.F., Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 30:1 (1996), 112–131.
12. Hervani, A.A., Sarkis, J., Helms, M.M., Environmental goods valuations for social sustainability: a conceptual framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 125 (2017), 137–153.
13. Jura Consultants, Bolton's museum, library and archive services; an economic valuation. Lond. Mus. Libr. Arch. Counc., 2005, 3–19.
14. Maddison, D., Foster, T., Valuing congestion costs in the British Museum. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 55 (2003), 173–190, 10.1093/oep/55.1.173.
15. Miles, M., Art, Space and the City: Public Art and Urban Futures. 1997, Psychology Press.
16. Motoyama, Y., Hanyu, K., Does public art enrich landscapes? The effect of public art on visual properties and affective appraisals of landscapes. J. Environ. Psychol. 40 (2014), 14–25.
17. Musterd, S., Ostendorf, W., (eds.) Urban Segregation and the Welfare State: Inequality and Exclusion in Western Cities, 2013 (Routledge).
18. NewPolitics, Art for the People? Christo and Jeanne-Claude's “The Gates”. found at http://newpol.org/content/art-people-christo-and-jeanne-claudes-gates, 2005.
19. Parr, H., Mental health, the arts and belongings. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 31:2 (2006), 150–166.
20. Perrons, D., Globalization and Social Change: People and Places in a Divided World. 2004, Psychology Press.
21. Pung, C., Clarke, A., Patten, L., Measuring the economic impact of the British library. New Rev. Acad. Librariansh. 10 (2004), 79–102, 10.1080/13614530412331296826.
22. Ramaswami, A., Russell, A.G., Culligan, P.J., Rahul Sharma, K., Kumar, E., Meta-principles for developing smart, sustainable, and healthy cities. Science 352:6288 (2016), 940–943.
23. Samuelson, P.A., Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econ. Stat., 1955, 350–356.
24. Sarkhel, P., Banerjee, S., Banerjee, S., Willingness to pay before and after program implementation: the case of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Bally Municipality, India. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 18:2 (2016), 481–498.
25. Sharp, J., Pollock, V., Paddison, R., Just art for a just city: public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Stud. 42:5–6 (2005), 1001–1023.
26. Throsby, D., Economics and Culture. 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
27. Whitehead, J.C., Incentive incompatibility and starting-point bias in iterative valuation questions. Land Econ. 78:2 (2002), 285–297.
28. Yoo, S.H., Moon, H.S., An estimation of the future demand for portable Internet service in Korea. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 73:5 (2006), 575–587.