Future fuel cell and internal combustion engine automobile technologies: A 25-year life cycle and fleet impact assessment

Energy

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2064-2087

  Schäfer, Andreas ^a   Heywood, John B ^b   Weiss, Malcolm A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fuel cell vehicle; Greenhouse gas emusions; Life cycle assessment; Transportation; Vehicle technology

Indexed keywords

ENERGY UTILIZATION; FUEL CELLS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; STORAGE BATTERY VEHICLES; TRANSPORTATION;

FUEL CELL VEHICLES; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY;

SYNTHETIC FUELS;

ENERGY UTILIZATION; FUEL CELLS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; STORAGE BATTERY VEHICLES; SYNTHETIC FUELS; TRANSPORTATION;

ENERGY USE; GREENHOUSE GAS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC EMISSION; TRANSPORT VEHICLE;

EID: 85058203370     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Reuters. Daimler-Benz fuels alternative energy hopes. C-reuters@clari.net, September 22, 1997.
2. Greene D.L., and DeCicco J. Engineering-economic analyses of automotive fuel economy potential in the United States. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25 (2000) 477-535
3. Weiss MA, Heywood JB, Drake EM, Schäfer A, AuYeung F. On the road in 2020: a well-to-wheels assessment on new passenger car technologies. Report no. EL 00-003, MIT Energy Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
4. Weiss MA, Heywood JB, Schäfer A, Natarajan VK. Comparative assessment of fuel cell cars. Report no. 2003-001 RP, MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
5. Thomas CE, James BD, Lomax FD, Kuhn IF. Societal impacts of fuel options for fuel cell vehicles. SAE technical paper series 982496, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, 1998.
6. Höhlein B, Nitsch J, Wagner U, Biedermann P, Menzer R, Grube Th, et al. Holistic systems study on the fuel transformation by fuel cells (Ganzheitliche Systemuntersuchung zur Energiewandlung durch Brennstoffzellen). Report no. 686, Forschungvereinigung Verbrennungskraftmaschinen e.V., Frankfurt am Main, 1998 [in German].
7. General Motors Corporation, Argonne National Laboratories, BP, ExxonMobil, Shell. Well-to-wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems-North American analysis, 2001. See also: http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/TA/163.pdf
8. General Motors Corporation, L-B Systemtechnik GmbH, BP, ExxonMobil, TotalFinaElf, GM. Well-to-wheel analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems-a European study. Ottobrunn, Germany: L-B-Systemtechnik GmbH, 2002. See also: http://www.lbst.de/gm-wtw
9. Ogden J.M., Williams R.H., and Larson E.D. Societal lifecycle costs of cars with alternative fuels/engines. Energy Policy 32 1 (2004) 7-27
10. Wang M, Huang HS. A full fuel-cycle analysis of energy and emissions impacts of transportation fuels produced from natural gas. Report no. ANL/ESD-40, Argonne National Laboratory Center for Transportation Research, Argonne, IL, 1999. See also: http://www.cleanairnet.org/infopool/1411/articles-35661_fullfuel_cycle.pdf
11. Energy Information Administration. Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States 1996 (1997), US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
12. Ogden JM, Kreutz DG, Steinbugler M. Fuels for fuel cell vehicles: vehicle design and infrastructure issues. Report no. 982500, Presented at society of automotive engineers fuels and lubricants meeting and exposition, San Francisco, CA, 1998.
13. Thomas CE, James BD, Lomax FD, Kuhn IF. Fuel options for the fuel cell vehicles: hydrogen, methanol, or gasoline? Presented at the fuel cell reformer conference, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA, 1998.
14. Carsten S, Teagan P, Stobart R. Fuels for fuel cell powered vehicles. SAE-paper 2000-01-0003, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, 2000.
15. US Energy Information Administration. Annual energy outlook. Report no. DOE/EIA-0383, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2005. See also: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/pdf/0383(2005).pdf
16. 2 emissions in the EU refining sector. Final report (revised) to Ford Motor Company, MathPro Inc., West Bethesda, ML, 2000.
17. Guzzella L., and Amstutz A. Quasi-stationary simulations, Matlab program and user manual (Quasi-Stationäre Simulationen, Matlab Programm und Benutzeranleitung) (1998), Laboratorium für Motorsysteme, Institut für Energietechnik, ETH Zürich [in German]
18. Chon D, Heywood JB. Performance scaling of spark-ignition engines: correlation and historical analysis of production engine data. SAE-paper 2000-01-0565, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, 2000.
19. Ballard Power Systems. Ballard fuel cell power module, Mark 900 Series, Mk 900 polarization. Burnaby, BC: Ballard Power Systems; 2001.
20. US Department of Energy. Cost analysis of fuel cell system for transportation, 2001 system cost estimate. Task 3 Report to the US Department of Energy, Arthur D. Little, Inc., SFAA no. DE-SCO2-98EE50526, Cambridge, MA, 2001.
21. DeCicco JM. Fuel cell vehicles: technology, market, and policy issues. SAE research report RR-010, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 2001.
22. Anderman M, Kalhammer FR, MacArthur D. Advanced batteries for electric vehicles: an assessment of performance, cost, and availability. Draft manuscript prepared for State of California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, 2000.
23. Duvall M., Taylor D., Wehrey M., Pinsky N., Warf W., Kahlhammer F., et al. Advanced batteries for electric vehicles, a technology and cost-effectiveness assessment for battery electric, power assist hybrid electric, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (2003), Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA
24. Automotive Engineering. Life cycle analysis: getting the total picture on vehicle engineering alternatives, March 1996. p. 49-52.
25. Röder A. Life-cycle inventory of different car powertrains. Final Report, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen Switzerland, 2000.
26. DaimlerChrysler. Environmental report-facts and figures, no date.
27. US Department of Commerce and US Department of Transportation. 1997 commodity flow survey (1999), Bureau of Transportation Statistics and US Census Bureau, Wahsington, DC. http://www.bts.gov/ntda/cfs/prod.html See also:
28. Davis S.W., and Diegel S.W. Transportation energy data book. 23rd ed (2003), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge, TN
29. US Department of Transportation. Vehicle inventory and use survey (VIUS) (2002), Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington, DC
30. Automotive Engineering. Progress in recycling specific materials from automobiles, August 1997. p. 51-3.
31. Greene D.L., Patterson P.D., Singh M., and Li J. Feebates, rebates and gas-guzzler taxes: a study of incentives for increased fuel economy. Energy Policy 33 6 (2005) 757-775
32. Nakicenovic N. The automobile road to technological change: diffusion of the automobile as a process of technological substitution. Technol Forecasting Social Change 29 4 (1986) 309-340
33. US Census Bureau. Statistical abstract of the United States, 122nd ed. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2002.
34. Wards Communications Inc., Various years, Wards automotive yearbook. Southfield, MI: Wards Communications Inc.
35. Hellman KH, Heavenrich, RM. Light-duty automotive technology and fuel economy trends: 1975 through 2003. Report no. EPA420-R-03-006, US Environmental Protection Agency, Advanced Technology Division, Washington, DC, 2003.
36. US Department of Transportation. Highway statistics. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information, Washington, DC, various years.
37. International Energy Agency. Automotive fuels for the future: the search for alternatives (1999), IEA/OECD, Paris
38. Joshi S., Lave L., MacLean H., and Lankey R. A lifecycle comparison of alternative transportation fuels. Proceedings of the SAE total life cycle conference (2000), Society of Automotive Engineers, Detroit, MI
39. Ford Motor Company. Integrated fuel cell analysis model (IFCAM). User instructions for version 3.1 (filename IFCAMV31.xls). Report to Ford Motor Company, Arthur D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, MA, 1996.
40. Ogden J.M., Steinbugler M., and Kreutz D.G. A comparison of hydrogen, methanol and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development. J Power Sources 79 (1999) 143-168
41. Heywood JB, Weiss MA, Schäfer A, Bassene SA, Natarajan VK. The performance of future ice and fuel cell powered vehicles and their potential fleet impact. SAE paper 2004-01-1011, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 2004.