Response of 2-MHz LWD resistivity and wireline induction tools in dipping beds and laminated formations

SPWLA 31st Annual Logging Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 1990, Pages

  Anderson, Barbara ^a   Bonner, Stephen ^a   Lüling, Martin G ^a   Rosthal, Richard ^a  

^a SCHLUMBERGER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC LOGGING; LAMINATING;

COMPUTER MODELING; ELECTRIC POLARIZATION; LOGGING WHILE DRILLING; RESISTIVITY ANISOTROPY; RESISTIVITY CURVES; RESISTIVITY TOOLS; VERTICAL RESOLUTION; WIRELINE INDUCTION;

SEPARATION;

EID: 85058191785     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. B. Anderson, K. A. Safinya, T. Habashy, “Effects of Dipping Beds on the Response of Induction Tools”, SPE 61st Annual Technical Conference, New Orleans (October, 1986), paper SPE 15488.
2. R. H. Hardman & L. C. Shen, “Theory of Induction Sonde in Dipping Beds”, Geophysics, Vol. 51, No. 3 (March, 1986), pp. 800-809.
3. S. C. Gianzero & S. M. Su, “The Response of an Induction Dipmeter and Standard Induction Tools to Dipping Beds”, to appear in Geophysics.
4. B. Clark et al., “A New Resistivity Measurement for FEWD”, Transactions of the SPWLA 29th Annual Logging Symposium, San Antonio, June 5-8, 1988, Paper A.
5. B. Anderson, T. D. Barber, J. Singer, T. Broussard, “ELMOD–Putting Electromagnetic Modeling to Work to Improve Resistivity Log Interpretation”, Transactions of the SPWLA 30th Annual Logging Symposium, Denver, June 11-14, 1989, Paper M.
6. D. F. Allen & M. G. Lüling, “Integration of Wireline Resistivity Data with Dual Depth of Investigation 2-MHz MWD Resistivity Data” Transactions of the SPWLA 30th Annual Logging Symposium, Denver, June 11-14, 1989, Paper C.
7. S. Chang & B. Anderson, “A Finite Element Method for Electromagnetic Well Logging in Cylindrical Boreholes”, Transactions of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium & URSI Radio Science Meeting, San Jose, Calif., June 26-30, 1989.
8. T. D. Barber, “Introduction to the Digital Induction Tool”, JPT (September 1985), 1699 - 1706.
9. T. D. Barber & A. Q. Howard, “Correcting the Induction Log for Dip Effect”, SPE 64th Annual Technical Conference, San Antonio (October 1989), paper SPE 19607.
10. A. Q. Howard, private communication.
11. A. Q. Howard & W. C. Chew, “A Variational Model of Induction Logging in a Dipping Bed Environment”, IGARSS Symposium, Vancouver (July 10-14, 1989), Session F8, paper 5.
12. H. G. Doll, “Introduction to Induction Logging and Applications to Logging of Wells Drilled with Oil-based Mud”, Petroleum Transactions, AIME (June 1949), 148 - 162.
13. J. Tittman, “Formation Anisotropy: Reckoning With its Effects”, The Oilfield Review, Vol. 2, No. 1 (January 1990), pp. 16-23.
14. B. Anderson, “The Analysis of Some Unsolved Induction Interpretation Problems Using Computer Modeling”, The Log Analyst, Vol. 27, No. 5 (Sept.-Oct., 1986), pp. 60-73.
15. J. H. Moran & S. C. Gianzero, “Effects of Formation Anisotropy on Reactivity Logging Measurements”, Geophysics, Vol. 44, No. 7 (July 1979), pp. 1266-86.
16. R. Chemali, S. C. Gianzero, S. M. Su, “The Effect of Shale Anisotropy on Focused Resistivity Devices”, Transactions of the SPWLA 28th Annual Logging Symposium, London, June 29-July 2, 1987, Paper H.
17. B. Anderson & T. D. Barber, “Using Computer Modeling to Provide Missing Information for Interpreting Resistivity Logs”, Transactions of the SPWLA 29th Annual Logging Symposium, San Antonio, June 5-8, 1988, Paper H.